OK guys, I gotta say something, I don't want to start more drama, but this azzbrkr guy has now left TWO fake reviews on a local Kgirl whose name starts with D. He didn't even bother to describe her body correctly (claims she's got no ass when everyone else says that's her best feature)....can we flag reviews?

Reviewed the same girl twice when his first review clearly says she is not the type of girl or the type of service he wants???

In October for describing a completely different person but nothing was done about it by TER. I think it interesting that in his second review, he says he doesn't like her appearance and yet raises the appearance score from a 5 to a 6. What a low-effort post.  

Is that he described her ass incorrectly?

Plagiarizing my reviews over the years, but that doesn't mean they didn't see the girl.  They will lift a sentence here and there word for word, and then add a little content of their own.  They just liked my phraseology better.   Lol

not because you call something out but due to HOW you call stuff out and HOW you respond to anyone that might have a different take or question your assertions about something.

When I reported his first review, my basis for it being fraudulent was his saying she was a milf. Some of the reviews mention her being young and if you've seen her, it's pretty apparent for more than just physical reasons (in addition to her confirming it in person). It's difficult to prove that in a Feedback or Problem Report though.

Where did I attack anyone?

Actually, I nabbed someone who cribbed an entire review I did on another site and posted it here as his own. It was flattering.

An early 30s can still considered a milf by some though, right?  

That "negative" reviews (although a 6/6 review isn't really that negative) are way more impactful than positive ones?

Yes, the negative reviews get more attention. Like somebody driving a clunker belching out smoke down the street, the negative stuff gets noticed more.

That's fair. We're making some progress, as you would say.

You're not wrong, but in this case, I think you need to have seen the girl to truly know the reviews were fake. She's in her early 20s lol.

Are you talking about setting up your own Rocket review monitoring agency to do this?

know me better than that?  LOL

Huh? I'm not quite sure what your post had to do with my previous one.  

Fake negative reviews suffer the same problem as delayed medication due to FDA processes. The observable metric is the people NOT suffering from really bad side effects (perhaps even worse that whatever disease the medicine is for) but all the people suffering or dying don't get included in most analysis. That can only happen ex post and it's easy then to say, but we could not know that earlier approval would not have resulted in massive deaths.

This would only be relevant if we could actually quantify how much one or the other is done. But we can’t. We can’t even come close.

I agree with you but its a lot harder to spot a fake positive review than a fake negative one, IMO

I asked why some people are quick to call out a fake negative review with little evidence, while fake positive review dont elicit even a whimper out of them when presented with far more evidence.

I’ll bet if you look through the forums you’ll see people complaining about reviews that make a girl look better than she is, too.

I'll ask again - so if you agree that bad or less than stellar reviews get more noticed, doesn't this mean that the owners of the service/business that get evaluated, in this case orgs/pos/insiders/girls, would want to discredit such reviews or make it seem like an outlier? I havent heard a clear answer from you there.

I also don't know why Jensen emphasizes money so much like it doesn't matter.  

I suggested that you were focused on the money at the expense of other factors that are equally important to many here.

"My post was about double standards. I don't see the op go at people who write fake positive reviews. But wrong description of an ass seems enough grounds to claim he wrote a fake one. The op claimed both reviews are fake. "

You also seem to think that a negative review of a kgirl means something different from a negative review of a product (and we all know how you love to compare kgirls to products).

Really? In my opinion it's the opposite.

I haven't seen him call out a fake positive review. I did not attack him. I do believe he is right here. And neither am I calling fh a liar. I do believe them more than not.  

Fair, but do the actual reviews or reviewers get called out?

I know many mongers who see many girls a month, yet who are disappointed immensely at every single subpar session they get. And it's not like they can't afford it.  

If I had a bad session and was unable to have another one for a week, you're fucking A right I'd be a lot more pissed than if I was simply able (which I am) to simply go see another provider that same day.  

I don't consider it a waste of my sperm unless I was the only one in the room. . . . . . and that hasn't happened in years!! Lol

-- Modified on 12/17/2020 3:14:30 AM

Yet again, you fail to answer my question. You pick and choose whatever you want to answer. Did I misquote you this time? Did I misinterpret something again?

Do you know what opportunity cost means, cdl?

There is no missed opportunity cost because my body can manufacture an endless supply of semen.  Missed opportunity costs require an event to be missed that cannot be repeated.  I feel bad for you if you view fucking a girl that was perhaps not your first choice is a missed opportunity.  As long as a session involves me shooting my load, it is never a missed opportunity IMO.

but your post shows you completely misunderstand the argument I was making.

Your point literally revolved around the fact that the majority of this board can afford a miss. And while yes, you concede that some may be saving up money for an appointment for days or weeks only to be disappointed, they are not the majority so they shouldn't be talked about. What did I misunderstand?

So you admit your standards are low. Gotcha.

I think the only thing we can all agree on is that you want to be at the center of attention and you think the best way to do that is to take an unreasonable and unsupportable position and then accusing everyone who dares disagree with you of being less pro monger than you are.

I don't care about being a center of attention. You responded to me and we carried a normal conversation until the point, as usual, I asked you a simple question you could not or did not want to answer. I have no idea why.  

Please feel free to concoct whatever bogus explanation you want.  

Please tell me,  what did I misinterpret from your post?

No. My point was more about opportunity costs and how that was much more important to many here than the monetary costs. To some extent that does follow from having more budget flexibility does make it much easier to care about the missed good opportunities than the money spent on marginal experiences. But that just falls from the marginal value of the dollar in many ways.

to respond with a DIFFERENT non-sequitur?   If I was served a Big Mac in a steakhouse, I would walk out the same way I would walk out of an incall if a 180-pound Kgirl answered the door (unless she was 6-foot-10).  You said some appointments are a waste of your semen, so that precludes walking out, so why are you required to stay in a steakhouse that serves you a Big Mac?  If you stay, its YOUR choice, not the restaurant's, the same as staying at an incall after you have seen the girl.  Once I have decided to stay, per your scenario, as long as I get to cum, there is no missed opportunity and no cost to me as far as the semen I use for the session.  My body will manufacture more as I go about my other activities that day.  

What? You already know I see girls for service, I don't walk out based on looks. So yes, I go through. A couple of times I had to just cut my losses and leave before busting a nut, but most times I tend to go through with busting a nut.

an ejaculation, then you did lose an opportunity, but that sounds more like a result of your attitude than her service.  I haven't ever met a Kgirl that didn't know how to make a customer cum, but if you're not open to it, or have attitude, then its on you, not them.  If you look on the bright side, then yes, if you did not ejaculate, then its another way not to waste your semen, but once you decide to pay and go through with the session, is a few ounces of semen really "wasted?"