I saw some strong reviews of a new Kgirl in LA who is only here through August 10th, so I decided to book her in two days at 11. I text booker and he/she responds yes, but please send references. No problem I send three recent refs. I wait for confirm of time. Next booker requests full name. I say why? My name is hobby name anyways as would be full name. Booker texts back OK, but fully booked until provider leaves! WTF?!? Then booker says I can be backup in case of cancellation, and adds, “Please send selfie.” Double WTF?!? I politely respond that no one has made this request in 10 years- no thanks! This booker seems to be an outlier with requests. I am not giving full name ( would be bogus anyway) or selfie. Plenty of other fish in the sea. Would you walk too?

If my references on their own aren't good enough, it is unfortunate but I'm out.

info to require from a guy who had recent local Kgirl references.  Yes, I absolutely would walk away from that org.  You should name the girl, so we know which girl is booked up for the duration of her visit.

Were they solid references who reply?
Can you ask them if they were contacted about your number?

I find it both frustrating and amusing that orgs are reluctant if not adversarial in their dealings with other orgs. I understand that some orgs have lower screening requirements and are therefore seen as a security risk to themselves. Wish there was a uniform standard but even as I type this, I realize that such a desired screening standard if applied could be more, invasive or perilous than the screening chaos we have now. One of the best things I loved about the AMP model was the fact that there was no screening. If the mama saw youvon the security cam and felt you were a risk, you simply did not get in (although the method seemingly had tragic results earlier this year in GA). I also believed the Honolulu AMPs were on the ins with LE because few looked benign and Dallas’ AMPs just scream “massage hell, Pussy for rent inside!” I’m cool with the orgs I’m in with for now (one tooks weeks to screen for, but conversely I had my best bay area experience there) so no more screening for a while.

With 338 or so FAKE reviews, why don't you post one to bust the girl?  You know you can give a ZERO.  Put your balls on the line and with your masturbation toy, get an erection (the only way that you can these days) to make a positive contribution to the community.

His reviews aren't fake. By saying that you're misleading others.  

My refs were fine - just check my reviews to see many recent providers. The girl is with a booker who has several women so the attitude really surprised me. The girl looks hot! In fact one reviewer said he thinks she is top three in LA in terms of looks. Most reviews were higher for looks than service. Oh well, I’ll settle for one in my regular rotation with great service and looks and “pass” on this untested beauty!

I sent a booker my standard info, first name, age & work status and 3 or 4 recent references. Texted back, send me your name, age, work and references! I'm thinking WTF? I just sent that, but don't want to antagonize them, so I sent it again. Now they ask for pic of DL and work place and ALL my references! I said the references are all current with well known orgs, if that's not good enough, I don't know what to tell you! They finally accepted, but I would've shined them on if they didn't accept my info, plenty of orgs out there!  

One of the things I like about CDL's reviews is his descriptions of the girls! He gives a pretty clear description of how they look!

A lot of the girls are using multiple bookers. You should look around, you might see her with someone else and that booker/org might be easier to get cleared with! Also, if she isn't with a second booker yet, she might be down the line! I'm also curious to know who she is!