Unless I am mistaken those pictures were taken by someone very familiar with the events in Dunwoody.....

While I’m familiar with the events referenced, im not following the gist of the posts. Is Harper real? Anyone seen her?

When I'm wrong, I will admit it....While she may not be brand new on the scene, there isn't a reason to not see her, and Harper....My deepest apologies, I will take my beatings and keep my mouth shut.

Harper is real, shes been utr for the most part.  She's nice and chill.  And her pics look familiar probably bc the same photographer does every girls pic in atlanta.  

What does all the cryptic messages even mean? What happened in Dunwoody? Why not provide some sort of details? Now Im not even sure if I should avoid her or what? What gives? How bout an actual explanation.

She is real, I saw her and review is pending.
I hardly post these days and that too an OP. But I thought I do need to write this one since I just saw the thread below about her. This is for the benefit of the community ...
First, she is real 100%. but that's not why I am posting this really.

Here is why, this town already has a jittery nerve from what happened last year end. I understand also that everyone wants to be safe and that's great and needed too.
However, when posters like Airman (real long timer) or BodytoBody (more frequent)  - 'speculates' and writes insinuations as if they know - they do two types of damages:
1. Damage to a provider who is trying to work
2. Damage to the community - they severely damage the credibility of info regarding this serious issue. Crying wolf when there is no wolf will destroy all the good that is done through such information sharing.

I do not give a hoot about if they are wrong about anything else that are lighter matter such as what ED pills they take or whatever .. you get the point.

In Airman's defense he has already corrected him self - that's a good act. That protects him being a 'reliable' poster - but the damage that he might have caused to the provider will not be that be easy control or revoke - especially the jittery nature of all of us. I do not doubt they are well intended - but that's not enough! You have to watch what you post regarding this serious matter. Body has not corrected himself yet - but I could careless for such self-serving prophecies.

My advice to all including (airman and body): if you don’t know JACK, don’t WACK !

I am not being a white-night _ I dont give a hoot about that either! I am just telling as what it is!

Peace!

Gentle

I couldnt have written that better myself.  I've seen several threads with insinuations and often wondered if they had concrete evidence or just insinuating for the hell of it.  In this case I knew Harper was real so it surprised me that it morphed into some weird insinuation.  I'm not really sure of the motivation behind it, bc one careless comment can drive away all business for a legit provider.

Anywho, props to Airman for correcting himself.  And typing this in a phone is hard.

When I made the familiar statement, I was referring to her looking familiar. I don't think she is new. I believe that she is re-branded. I would not want to imply that she was in any way related to the agency situation from last year. I read my post again and understand how it could have been interpreted that way. I apologize for any trouble or issue that my post has caused. I am very sorry. Brian