Sometimes when there are many undetailed reviews on the same provider "the routine" of the provider becomes apparent and it turns me off.  Then that rare, well written, detailed review appears and you discover that "the routine" is just her way of getting you comfortable or her way of making things progress for the enjoyment of her gentleman caller.  The details reveal how the lady is special.  What is different from guy to guy.  A fella who reveals how this lady is unique would be something I'd want to read.  A fella telling us how HE feels gives us insight into the experience.  You can't tell me that the same lady had the exact same experience with each man...like a video being rewound time and time again.  I think a reviewer needs to give the thing some thought or decide not to write at all.  I'm biased cause I'm a long winded son-of-a-bitch...but that's me.
 So I don't think the solution is fewer reviews...just better ones.  The lady can screen to avoid LE.  But a bunch of well written reviews is worth a thousand pictures.

It amazes me how people come up with this stuff. Seriously, what makes you think that's the case?

LE don't feel a need to rationalize their busts of working girls; they bust working girls to rationalize their budgets. They can show a bunch of arrests without having to deal with a bunch of dangerous criminals. And they are totally unapologetic.  

I'm sure they target providers who they think might be involved in a felony, like those who work at an incall location where multiple ladies work. Usually though, they just throw out a net and pull in everything that swims into it. The ladies who don't screen well are the ones who usually get caught.

A lot of us LIKE the publicity new reviews give us! It's good for business.

I like what Jockeypants wrote about how to write a review. I don’t like all the details told, but something that gives the reader an idea of the feeling of the encounter and not just the general structure is far more informative.  He makes a good point about how reviews can make a provider sound scripted, when that’s not the case at all. After all, a restaurant review that tells how the hostess seated them, the waiter took their order, they ate dinner (soup, lamb, potatoes and asparagus), and then they paid the check and left doesn’t give you an impression of the experience.


-- Modified on 6/6/2004 3:10:01 AM

(1) It is for the free days given to their account for each review.

(2) As long as a lady is working she needs fresh reviews to stimulate business.(Just as Burger King advertises we need to be reminded that we can "have it Our way")

  IAATM

    Cm.

One of the reasons I post a review is to relive the experience both mentally and physically.

Peoples perceptions are also different.  What is important to one may not be important to another.

I agree with you.  If a hobbyists sees a provider who has 50+ reviews and his experience is the norm then writing a reviews seems to be a waste of time.  I agree that reviews should definitely be written on ripoffs or poor performers.
    I typically perfer to see providers who have something less than twelve reviews but something more than three, at the time that I see them.  For the ones on the highend of my range, if my experience is what I expected, I do not write a review unless she asks me to or if she has not been reviewed for a while.  I do reviews for the ones on the low to middle of my range, unless they ask me not to.

Yeah, part of it is the free days.  But I always try to write the kind of review Jockeypants is talking about.  The rest of you will have to judge how well I succeed.

Another is that a stream of up to date reviews helps hobbyists.  Everyone, even providers, change over time and most guys are interested in what she's like now, not what she was like six months ago.

Finally, having a recent (good) review helps a lady's business.  There are all sorts of 'business models' out there, from ladies who fly under the radar and don't allow reviews at all to those who use reviews as their primary form of advertising.  Let's face it, I'm probably not the only guy who starts out his TER day by browsing the "New Reviews".

It has been noted on other threads that this is not the primary purpose of reviews, and I agree.  But if I've had a 'rock my world' experience and my review has the side effect of helping out the provider I see no harm in that.

I think ProviderX is right and you are wrong about the LE risk.

enjoy having tons of email, and their phones and pagers going all day.

I just like simple and sweet. Most of my clients don't do reviews. That's fine. As long as there are current reviews up, I'm OK. I don't need pages and pages. In fact, going under the radar sounds good, too - with NOTHING visible at all!

Those who are interested WILL find me.

...such as if her appearance has changed (new hair color, breast augmentation surgery, weight gain/loss, etc.).  They can also inform us if the services she will/will not provide change.  (For instance, I know a provider who used to be strictly CBJ only, but started performing BBBJ just in order to get higher scores in her reviews.)  

Information is only good if it is current!  When researching whether or not to see a provider I haven't seen before, I usually read only the latest 6 to 8 reviews, and don't bother with any that are over a year old.

When a Lady, even one who has been reviewed often and well, doesn't have a few "current" reviews, people start asking, "Is she still around?  Has something changed that no one is seeing her any more?"

Just think:  Do you know what Coke, Pepsi, Bud, or Miller is?  Has their product changed recently?  But do they still advertize?