For all you, who think I was believing in conspiracy theories..I see you are starting to see
the truth I WAS PREACHING MONTHS AGO!!!! and I see you opening your eyes...Im just not a republican, IM WAY MORE CONSERVATIVE THAN THEM!!! Im independent and our best bet to have stopped this shit would have been Ron Paul..Its the FED and our DEBT that is making all this possible..and ron paul was going to audit them if he had become president..
BUT INDY'S NEVER GET NEWS COVERAGE, why is that? The politicians that arent dem or republican are the ones with our best interest at heart, they also seem to be the only ones AGAINST this oranized crime we have going on in America today, we call our GOVERNMENT..We will see how in the world, those stupid obamabots tide in 2010, they all got registered to vote for Odrama..MOST OF HIS VOTING POOL, wont get out and vote in 2010- But their vote was needed to put this anti-american/anti-christ in office
-- Modified on 7/6/2009 2:18:53 AM
I was intimately involved in the Ron Paul campaign, specifically because of the need to get a handle on the private banking cartel known as the Federal Reserve. Ron Paul was the only Republican ready, willing and able to address this central issue.
One thing I found interesting was if you listen to people like Mark Levin, if you go down a whole host of real issues, the only Republican who matches them on those issues is Ron Paul. And yet, when it counted most, the Levins of the world called Ron Paul a "crackpot."
This technique was invented by the commies, and is called "The psycho-pathologization of dissent."
The gist is that anyone who approaches the REAL core issues is dismissed out of hand as a "conspiracy theorist," "crackpot," "racist," etc. In this way, they don't have to address those issues because the character of the person raising them has been impeached in the public mind.
If the public weren't so full of sheeple who can be led by the nose using the simplest of psychological manipulations (i.e. "everyone thinks X"); then this technique wouldn't work to discredit someone like Ron Paul for anyone capable of thinking for themselves.
Trouble is, we have too few who think for themselves. Whether they label themselves "conservative," "liberal," or anything else -- most people adopt what *someone else says* as their personal philosophy.
And when it comes to influential radio commentators like Limbaugh, Hannity and Levin -- you can rest assured that the content of their philosophy will never be far outside the range of what the powers that be will allow in terms of dissent.
In other words, they are allowed to be where they are precisely because they are NOT dangerous to the status quo. They provide a forum for faux resistance so that people spend their energies on impotent idiocy. This gives people a way to "blow off steam" that is safe to the status quo.
And the proof of this is simply that, when given an opportunity to put their support behind a man who embodies everything they SAY they believe -- Ron Paul -- instead of supporting him, they actually used the Frankfurt School Marxist technique of pathologization of dissent to discredit him with the sheeple.
There are many avenues of potential AUTHENTIC dissent. The Ron Paul meetup groups have continued under other guises. There are over 20 active secessionist groups in the United States, some of whom are picking up steam. Groups like NumbersUSA, Grassfire (and their newest offspring, ResistNet) and the Appleseed project (appleseedinfo.org) give you the opportunity to make your efforts truly meaningful.
Those who signed the Declaration of Independence, pledging their "lives, fortunes and sacred honor," didn't do so in a risk-free environment. Many suffered mightily for their commitment. And they didn't endure that suffering so that their posterity would throw it all away in order to absorb propoganda from the idiot box while drooling into a napkin.
Today, too many of those people who realize something is terribly wrong are so fearful of even being called a nasty name that they stick with the impotent "politically correct dissent." Our founding fathers would puke in disgust.
I am involved in a large number of patriotic organizations. (Most of which I haven't mentioned). If you care about the future of freedom, I encourage you to find an avenue for authentic dissent and get busy. The sacrifices of our forefathers demand no less. It is time to re-prove our worthiness of our priceless inheritance, or we will lose it.
about the thinking for our self part...
Americans have been brainwashed, to think we need big brothers helping hand, BY THE NEWS, instead of seeing how instead of getting help or security, WE ARE LOSING OUR FREEDOM..
Basicaly to ''secure'' us..WE CANT BE FREE..and Americans are to braindead to see it (ALOT OF THEM ARE)..when your listening to the news, ALWAYS REMIMBER its only an oppnion your hearing, AND ALWAYS THINK ABOUT WHAT THEYRE SAYING..Dont accept it as an absolute truth...
Ps.. months ago, I was saying how bad our news was lieing and brainwashing us, and these assholes on this board, labeled me, all the things you said they would..In their programed marxist fashion without even realizing it..YOU MAKE VERY VALID POINTS..But in a twist of irony, I see by reading their posts now, ALOT OF THEM SEE I WAS TELLING THE TRUTH, and they agree with me, and see ALL of what I used to say comming to AN OBVIOUS and SOBERING TRUTH and REALITY..
xOxO John, you are a patriot xOxO
God Bless The USA!!!!
remixed capitalism peddled by a bunch of would be lightweight imperialists.
Actually, Charlie, I am the precise opposite of an imperialist/internationalist; in that I am an economic nationalist. An economic nationalist opposes both socialist internationalism AND capitalist internationalism (i.e. imperialism).
(Note: economic nationalism is not the same thing as racial nationalism. If you want racial nationalism visit Japan or China. Both also have economic nationalism.)
But don't let me get in the way of your fun in slinging canned phrases!
Can I also please pretty please be called a "capitalist pig?"
And I'll feel incomplete if you don't tell me that I am a hard-hearted bastard who gets his jollies by contemplating children starving to death.
Oh -- and don't forget to echo Nietzsche -- "God is dead."
But have you ever READ Nietzsche? You'd get some kicks out of The Antichrist, but my favorites are Thus Spake Zarathustra and Beyond Good and Evil.
I guarantee he'd leave you apoplectic. I love him though, and I especially enjoy Shaw's interpretation in "Man and Superman."
The trouble with all this socialist stuff is it attempts to enslave the Supermen and Superwomen -- those who really make the world work. This is not a good idea.
Capitalism has serious flaws in that it provides opportunities for corruption of government to then actually restrict, rather than free, the market on behalf of a special interest. It's a serious problem.
But that doesn't mean that setting up a system where every person's "need" constitutes a first mortgage on my life is a better alternative.
By all means -- let's muster the courage to fix the corruption in our system. But don't do it at the expense of denying the Supermen and Superwomen who run the motor of the world.
The institutionalized pervasive parasitism of socialized systems only works so long as guys like me are willing to allow themselves to be victims. Don't count on it working forever.
(*chuckle*)
bullshit up all you want but at the end of the day it is still capitalism which is based on human greed. In the end after all of the capitalist cannibalization of the worlds economy, communism will crush the life out of the running dogs. Perhaps it will happen sooner than you might expect.
