Was that in order to receive a 10 providers have to perform Greek and no longer can a lady just get rated high because it's simply offered on her menu. That may be broad stroking, but in a nutshell that's really it. Also a lot of Top ladies haven't received any new reviews since the new criteria came out.
I'm usually just interested in Asian escort ratings, look for "new" reviews in the 8's and 9's. Lately I've been hard pressed to find anything over mid 7. Are they getting bored with us?
Under the new rules, reviewers have to actually write that kissing with tongue, BBBJ, or Greek happened for the review to qualify for anything higher than a 7.
Apparently just checking the boxes doesn't count.
I'd say go by the CONTENT of the reviews (favorable or not, would he repeat or not) rather than focusing on the numbers.
I know that my own 7s sound very much like my reviews with higher numbers attached, making the numerical score more or less meaningless. 
There's a thread on the Suggestion & Policy discussion board which essentially petitions TER to POLL members for their opinions on the review numerical-scoring system.
Chime in there and MAKE YOUR VOICE HEARD!!! Support the creation of an opinion poll on this topic! 
So far, Admin has not weighed in, but perhaps if the chorus of voices grows loud enough, we might get a response.
Of all the suggestions made, the idea of a poll/survey of those who most utilize TER makes 100% sense.
There have been way to many threads on so many boards that it's difficult to imagine why nothing but crickets have been heard.
Apparently just checking the boxes doesn't count.
I'd say go by the CONTENT of the reviews (favorable or not, would he repeat or not) rather than focusing on the numbers.
I know that my own 7s sound very much like my reviews with higher numbers attached, making the numerical score more or less meaningless.
Like Debra mentioned I read the entire review. One man's 7 is another man's 9.
... when I advocated this approach (read the reviews, rather than focussing only on a number) the other day, it was like I'd advocated shooting one's mother. So obviously lots of people LOVE those numbers! :P
The numbers are a fact of life, only an idiot would think they don't matter to the vast majority of the members here. I don't trust the numbers either, but if I see a lady with a dozen reviews and not a single score over a seven, I am most likely going pass right on by her without another look. So don't say they don't matter.
If we are going to have numbers, and that's not up to you or me, we should strive to make them as relevant as possible. Simply ignoring them might work for you, but try telling that to the gal with a bunch of low scores who can't get her phone to ring. THEY MATTER and a system that is more fair to the hard working providers is desperately needed.
Numbers may or may not matter, but the system will become the new normal. It's like inflation or deflation. Everything adjusts to new expectations.
Is so ridiculous now. I just focus on providing the best service possible and try not to pay too much attention to the score. I'm a perfectionist so it would honestly drive me crazy if I focused on it.
Who cares about numbers. Honestly you could be missing out on some real experiences by only checking numbers.
I saw a provider whose performance for that visit was --for me--a one in a life time. As has been pointed out: tho I had had a sensational BBJ and enjoyed great tongue kissing and great DATY, I did not specifically mention the tongue and the BBJ tho I did go into detail about DATY. It took me a while to get the score to a nine from a 7. TER support directed me to the new rules under which you need to specify what happened if the provider is to get credit for it. Then the score went to 9. Ten would have been out of the question.
I have always paid more attention to what is written than a specific score but I wonder about the way the points can be allocated: Say I was just into very hard asexual bondage and torture (I am not). A lady could drive me absolutely wild with whippings, CBT, enemas, etc and I could only give a 7 despite what would have been for me a one in a life time. (Just for future meetings and clarity, I am not into asexual anything, certainly not pain.)
-- Modified on 3/17/2017 7:41:18 AM
not easier. You had to go back and add more about the dfk and bbj. The new review rules make it more difficult for both sides of the fence.
Steph xoxo
-- Modified on 3/17/2017 6:56:37 AM
Since it is St. Paddy's Day
8o)
I was looking at a provider's page that showed CBJ. I usually pass on by as BBBJ is what I want.
But, I read the three last reviews of the lady (all 9's) and found that the reviewers had all received BBBJ. Learning to read has really paid off. Who would have thunk?
on cleanliness you know?!
But, I read the three last reviews of the lady (all 9's) and found that the reviewers had all received BBBJ. Learning to read has really paid off. Who would have thunk?
Very true! Hence my fixation on manscaping and a good wash and scrub prior offering my member for BBBJ.
I don't think anything is affecting appearance scores. But by the new rule the narratives for performance must be exact. For example , it makes no dif if the profile indicates BBBJ or kissing with tongue . Makes no dif if you check those boxes when preparing your review. If you do not specifically mention those services as occurring during your session TER will reject or lower the performance score.
the point of TER is to be the largest review site.. but at least in my case, since the new changes on the ratings, several of my clients decided to not review because my scores would not be what they want. Many of them told me they would not review me bc of that reason...
The new rules have settled in and become the normal. I am not going to be the first one to decrease her scores or rating. My writing skills are just not that good.
I guess I will NEVER write any reviews, will I? lol
Sorry , just too easy.
how hard is it to put these three lines at the start of the juicy details:
Kisses with tongue (or DFK as that covers the base here)? Y.
BBBJ? Y
DATY? Y
then just change the Y to an N or not put that line in as appropriate?
It's way too fucking easy and makes way too much fucking sense to ever be employed here.
It would most definitely be so easy to have a check list of the menu items that can earn a lady an extra point for each reviewer to check Y or N to when writing his review, Whoever approves the review will have no doubts nor would there be any ambiguity where it comes to " what is the maximum score she can receive?"
Or we have to appeal to the board. Since when is there dishonor in getting a 7? I understand we all give our best...it is ok not to get the trophy 10. What I request is that the men step up and understand that. Read what is written. Know that the numbers have changed...and are still relative and subjective.
and that is the biggest problem. It's like judging Olympic Gymnastics where a 9.9 is considered a bad score. For all practical purposes we have a scale that runs from 7-10, with anything below considered just "bad".
For a GFE provider to "only" average a 7 in performance is going to chase a lot of guys off with the easy scoring of the last few years. The problem is, TER didn't fix the problem with the new scoring rules, they just made it more confusing without addressing the root cause of the problem
There is no disgrace in getting a 7 if that is what is deserved. As you know I had the great pleasure of spending a few hours with you for what felt like a 10 performance or at least a 9.5, But had I been uninterested in deep kissing or in a BBJ (hard to imagine, but suppose), I would have had to give your wonderful performance including spectacular DATY an astoundingly exciting hand job and wonderful body to body rubs as well as exposure to your charming personality (God forbid that should count.) a 7. Would that have really represented the intensity, warmth, quality of your services?.
Was that in order to receive a 10 providers have to perform Greek and no longer can a lady just get rated high because it's simply offered on her menu. That may be broad stroking, but in a nutshell that's really it. Also a lot of Top ladies haven't received any new reviews since the new criteria came out.
...that has led to reviewers lying about getting greek. An escort I see regularly, who does offer greek, told me she did not do it with a reviewer who claimed she did.
... no 10 w/o Greek. It's effectively, for FM sessions, no 9 w/o BBBJ (or Greek). And no 8 w/o one of those plus kissing with tongue, although that one is usually offered. So TER is also telling us that a provider who does CBJ for safety reasons (or maybe just detests CIM) isn't worthy of getting even a 9.
Just he the advanced review looks min or 8 performance min 9, Asian, New Reviews, USA, LA -- got 5 pages of hits back.
After all anal seems to be the one activity that will kick a one on one session over the top into qualifying for tens and correct me if I am wrong, but don't most TS providers offer greek?
..... it's a total change in concept.
It's pretty simple to look at 1-7 is for performance and 8-10 are for add ons. And a threesome, either FMF or MMF can make it a 10 as can greek.
It's just a new language that you guys are not learning yet.
As to the provider saying that a reviewer wrote that she took it up the ass but didn't......., that's just a he said she said battle. Who knows what the truth is. It's like all the reviews that state that the cover was put on. I bet there were plenty of those covers never put on, but who knows what the truth is.
All this blow back about the new format reminds me of the bullshit that is spouted about putting in 110 percent effort. There is no such thing. If you are putting in 100 percent effort and you can do more,you are sandbagging. You were not putting in 100 percent.
Long way of saying........... Get over it.
What score do you get if you offer that?
Just kidding. I skid in right under the "what is wrong with this lady" It's a messy system for me because,
1.) It sounds like our scores now are tied to our willingness to offer riskier services. That seems like a step backward not forward.
2.) One man's journey .... I might do xyz with Jimbob but not want to do it with BobbyJim. Bobbyjim just smells bad. He will give me a lower score and I have no rebuttal. I can't write under his review his "ass smelled like death, no ball licking today"
3.) For clients who don't want those particular bells and whistles but appreciate the finery of a well delivered basic full service, there's no general score that reflects the overall approach, quality skill of the services rendered.
4.) To be honest, while you're all lovely prose writers, I can't help but get skeeved out when I read reviews. There's something so shockingly dismissive about the other person. I can't even put my finger in it, on it, sorry.
5.) I'm very new to this, and still figuring out where I land on some of these issues
In the DC area it seems like there are a gizzillion Asian escort agencies that have ladies with average scores in the 8/9 range.