I don't recognize the reviewer, but he's whitelisted and has a few reviews ... could be legit, but she only has one review? I'm confused, or according to Sexy Carolina, I'm a "dick"
No response the first time but now there is a review up on Miss Valerie. Still seems too good to be true. And you know what they say about things that are too good to be true. Any more insight or opinions from anyone? Here is the review: http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=278733
Too many red flags here.
I don't recognize the reviewer, but he's whitelisted and has a few reviews ... could be legit, but she only has one review? I'm confused, or according to Sexy Carolina, I'm a "dick"
Having a dick is a proboner
Ps...
With regards to my understanding about reviews and an alias
I didn't quite understand that you could have 12 reviews but only 10 listed and the two missing were not under an alias but missing because the provider retired or was delisted etc etc
For that I apologize
I Love Dick in fact I wrote a poem with that title in my blog
-- Modified on 6/1/2015 9:35:36 PM
I know. I read it.
Ps...
With regards to my understanding about reviews and an alias
I didn't quite understand that you could have 12 reviews but only 10 listed and the two missing were not under an alias but missing because the provider retired or was delisted etc etc
For that I apologize
I Love Dick in fact I wrote a poem with that title in my blog
-- Modified on 6/1/2015 9:35:36 PM
Yeah and I read what you wrote
Ps...
With regards to my understanding about reviews and an alias
I didn't quite understand that you could have 12 reviews but only 10 listed and the two missing were not under an alias but missing because the provider retired or was delisted etc etc
For that I apologize
I Love Dick in fact I wrote a poem with that title in my blog
-- Modified on 6/1/2015 9:35:36 PM
Her website popped into existence (domain registered) just a couple weeks ago. It's well done with many of the details I'd expect of experienced ladies, yet she's only listed as 19 years old.
Pictures are high quality and do not show up anywhere else. And they're not too revealing.
My thoughts are she has a really good mentor, or paid a business manager, or else is LE. Her one reviewer is not known to me, yet seems to have a smattering of established providers.
If it's a sting then it's well done to capture the BP surfers and may have ensnared a TER member who posted a review - but that's a reach.
I'd list her in the TOFTT group for now.
I emailed her (or the email given).........was asked to use the verification service. When I questioned it, I got no reply.
Sure to be a ripoff.
All but one of the reviewers reviews were done in May. I'm guessing the user has had their account hijacked.
Anyway, I can confirm Valerie is a CC scam. Trouble report has been sent
OK so my instincts appear to have been correct. Glad I didn't jump in. So about this guy that did the glowing review....doesn't he need to 'splain himself? .....
Is a scam.
Avoid!
there have been many, many threads on this.
The BP ads tend to have a website listed in the format providername.com and refer you to escortchex for screening. Websites seem to be high quality and gals generally look TGTBT with high quality photos and studio photos. Most look like new providers with a recent review (in some cases severaal recent reviews). The reviewers generally all have several recent reviews, all of which are suspect.
If you email or call the provider, someone(?) will respond and seem legit... but you will always be sent to the scam verification site!
DO NOT BE SUCKERED IN!!
Yeah, one & only one review, on a questionable lady. Love your sarcasm !
Yeah , I'm sure it's legit.......lol
Well, some guy didn't pay attention to what his fellow hobbyist had to say about this one---imagine that
)
Got his CC and vanished---pay attention peeps!!! See Real Review
(