I'd be a lady that falls under the GGT category as I like a bit of chemistry and a natural flowing date. My gent is my focus and I use my intuition to make the experience as good for him as possible.
Its been years since I tried to incorporate all of the "menu acts" into the experience, because it simply felt fake to me. Or as you put it, mechanical. Also takes time away from what the gent enjoys most and isn't it preferred that a lady give more of what he likes? 
For some gents, a checklist can be seen as a circus vs truly enjoyable.
Stumbled on a blogpost that argues
"[M]any clients have forgotten that the true purpose of the girlfriend experience is to be treated as though they are more than just a transaction." and goes on to blame the internet, and as a specific example gives the recent TER scoring changes, for driving that.
It's true that expectations for the menu and skill level have also gone up (especially at mid-tier and above price points) but that doesn't mean that expectations for the 'more than a transaction' fantasy have gone down. If anything, I'm thinking they've at the very least stayed the same, and probably increased together with the menu and service expectations.
Any other thoughts?
My first ATF, who I probably saw 40+ times over a few years, was an incredible Non-GFE GFE. Her services were non-GFE but her service was GFE+. Wait ... her menu was non-GFE but my time with her was GFE+++.
Thus, I don't agree with the article. In theory, every Provider sets her own limits. I gather from many recent posts, that some will feel pressured to push or break those limits because of the revised fucked up scoring system. Forget about the numerical max scores! Just try to provide the best of what you do do. 100% = 7/7 or 8/8 or 9/9 or 10/10.
"[M]any clients have forgotten that the true purpose of the girlfriend experience is to be treated as though they are more than just a transaction." and goes on to blame the internet, and as a specific example gives the recent TER scoring changes, for driving that.
It's true that expectations for the menu and skill level have also gone up (especially at mid-tier and above price points) but that doesn't mean that expectations for the 'more than a transaction' fantasy have gone down. If anything, I'm thinking they've at the very least stayed the same, and probably increased together with the menu and service expectations.
Any other thoughts?
If the average guy was in good shape they would not need a bbbj to get a good hard erection. Many providers offer the service because they get higher rates for it. That is the only reason why they do it.
-- Modified on 2/15/2017 11:05:47 PM
Contender for SPOTY that is.
There really is no end to your stupidity. Do you really think all of us who love BBBJ need it to get hard? Even you can't be that fucking stupid. I usually walk into the incall already hard, most of the time I am already sporting wood walking down the hall in anticipation of getting laid. A slight breeze is enough to give me wood. But I still LOVE BBBJ.
On the bright side though, if you post enough, you could actually give fg a run for his money this year.
I vote we we keep TER mellow and informative.
be seen and not heard.
and he is just as much a Chicken Little under that handle as well..
as for the idiot BSU "Google". He too should neither be seen or heard, much less have a vote as to how the rest of us conduct ourselves here.
The first is that you obviously don't know much about Chicken Little, MOST of the responses he gets are "personally insulting" and for good cause.
The second is that you are well on your way to winning this years BSU. TER has never been "mellow and informative" I am one of the most informative posters on this board, but I am far from mellow, you and the rest of the uber-sensitive posters are just going to have to learn to deal with the locker-room atmosphere we have here, grow a thicker skin or simply GFY. Your choice, posters like me are a fact of life on this board and we aren't going anywhere. Posters like you OTOH come and go all the time and are quickly forgotten five minutes after you are gone.
The BBBJ has become pretty standard, so most experiences are eligible for an 8. If you book a duo, you'll probably have a good time and get at least one BBBJ, so doubles automatically qualify them for at least a 9. I still have never gotten a definitive answer if doubles affect the averages of the two providers or stand alone as an evaluation of the duo, so maybe that's a mote point.
If a client books a session, and spends the entire session with DFK and BB69, and say he's a one-and-done, that might be an extremely intimate and fulfilling experience. Can't get her a 10, but...
Also, Appearance still amounts to half of he total "score." So the providers who workout and are strict about keeping themselves up have a tremendous edge.
So how conscious the provider is about keeping her ratings up probably determines how regulated she'll be about getting everything in, hoping that hitting all the bases means she's done a good job, and this approach is more likely to result in a mechanical routine that doesn't vary much from one provider to the next, and the GFE gradually ceases to be much more than a label for the type of transaction advertised.
There really are those who try to actually connect and enjoy sharing a couple hours with someone they feel a bit of chemistry with. Maybe these ladies should come up with a way to describe what they offer. Maybe something like GGT-- Genuine Girlfriend Tryst. I'd like that because since that's something I look for it would make it easier to find new encounters.
I'd be a lady that falls under the GGT category as I like a bit of chemistry and a natural flowing date. My gent is my focus and I use my intuition to make the experience as good for him as possible.
Its been years since I tried to incorporate all of the "menu acts" into the experience, because it simply felt fake to me. Or as you put it, mechanical. Also takes time away from what the gent enjoys most and isn't it preferred that a lady give more of what he likes? For some gents, a checklist can be seen as a circus vs truly enjoyable.
If a hooker really, passionately hates TER, she will find a way to blame TER for all of her personal and client-related problems. It's quite pathetic. TER is not perfect (I can never give the high scores I want to in my reviews), but for the most part, TER lives up to its purpose of A)keeping us safe from LE, and B) giving us some research tools to find exactly what we're looking for in an encounter. As for GFE, no one has ever been able to come to an exact agreement on what it entails. It's one of those subjective things.
.... and look at it as a description of the actions taken in a session, the easier this will be. It's just a number!!!!
It's a total change in thinking.
As to GFE or non GFE labels. That's what the written reviews are for. To get an idea of the way the services are delivered. A beautiful woman is a beautiful woman. But, a beautiful woman with a great personality and great sexual talent is another thing all together.
My favorite providers show me in their actions that they appreciate me and that they enjoy our time together. Whether it is fact, which I would like it to be, really does not matter. They behave in a way that makes the journey with them really attractive to me. So, I repeat.
All this freak out over scoring that has a bit more objectiveness to it is laughable. Adding more labels is laughable. Just read reviews, there are some reviewers who can convey the sessions pretty well. There are some that suck at it and there are some that just plain lie. So judge for yourself. It sounds like some mongers are trying to place an order for a commodity. But, interpersonal relationships by their nature are never exactly the same. That is not possible because of all the variables. But, getting a real idea of what actually transpires in a session is a big help in deciding whether to give her a try.
The fun is in walking in that door and finding that gem of a lady or ladies who can take my full attention for the amount of time that I contract for.
Now, who is next?
So if a provider is mediocre, but you put it in her butt and get a bbbj- That would be 70% of 9, roughly 7.
If she's off the charts fabulous, but you "wasted" a bunch of time going down on her and you don't like anal- That would be 100% of 7.
They both have 7's. Are those reviews or descriptions of the actions?
Also, the detailed review is supposed to be a description of the actions!
I understand the old docking for a reduced "menu" but adjusting what's supposed to be a qualitative score with a checklist for that evening just doesn't make sense.
If she's off the charts fabulous, but you "wasted" a bunch of time going down on her and you don't like anal- That would be 100% of 7.
All menu items do is raise the ceiling. They don't earn a particular score. She could do each and every menu item and if somehow it were a mediocre experience still get a 6.
It's possible not everyone calculates it like an allocation though. Lol
This is very well said and I think you completely get it.
The scoring really isn't as valuable as the details left by those who convey the session well.
What we are witnessing is a lack of this understanding and too much attention on the menu.
The "menu mentality" can make all readers of a review think he's going to get the same connection and this is that grey area that makes GFE such a subjective term.
Someone above mentioned that they wish there were a term called "genuine girlfriend tryst" for those who aren't as focused on the menu as they are on establishing chemistry. I'd bet that the writer of this blog wishes for the same. I do too. Until then, I will just have to work on how I present myself to attract gents whom desire such to me.
It's a total change in thinking.
As to GFE or non GFE labels. That's what the written reviews are for. To get an idea of the way the services are delivered. A beautiful woman is a beautiful woman. But, a beautiful woman with a great personality and great sexual talent is another thing all together.
My favorite providers show me in their actions that they appreciate me and that they enjoy our time together. Whether it is fact, which I would like it to be, really does not matter. They behave in a way that makes the journey with them really attractive to me. So, I repeat.
All this freak out over scoring that has a bit more objectiveness to it is laughable. Adding more labels is laughable. Just read reviews, there are some reviewers who can convey the sessions pretty well. There are some that suck at it and there are some that just plain lie. So judge for yourself. It sounds like some mongers are trying to place an order for a commodity. But, interpersonal relationships by their nature are never exactly the same. That is not possible because of all the variables. But, getting a real idea of what actually transpires in a session is a big help in deciding whether to give her a try.
The fun is in walking in that door and finding that gem of a lady or ladies who can take my full attention for the amount of time that I contract for.
Now, who is next?
as opposed to "original meaning," for instance. I don't know what "GFE" meant in the first place, but so what if it's shifted from meaning "less business-like" to "less business-like" plus "FS, DFK, DATY, BBBJ [or whatever]?" That change, if it happened, could have been for better or worse, but I don't see the point in characterizing it as untrue.
Now, of people somehow forgot what GFE used to mean, and now think it means the opposite, okay. That would be a perversion of the truth. However, that's not the case here.