Carolinas
Re: ...????.....
I need someone near Greenville. Charlotte is the furthest I could go.
I am pretty sure I don't have any std, including herpes. I wonder if a provider would get tested, and send the results to my email. If she is clean as of the test date, my safety is improved greatly. I am surprised there is no service offering
sexual health verification, which any sexually active person could use.
If you are a provider willing to do this, or know one who might be, please send a message.
Thank you for reading this.
Brian
I am pretty sure I don't have any std, including herpes. I wonder if a provider would get tested, and send the results to my email. If she is clean as of the test date, my safety is improved greatly. I am surprised there is no service offering
sexual health verification, which any sexually active person could use.
If you are a provider willing to do this, or know one who might be, please send a message.
Thank you for reading this.
Brian
How much are you offering for her to "abstain"?
Ya know, because she would definately have a"loss of income" waiting for you, Prince Charming!
Well Foxy your word is good enough for me and besides I can attest that You are as clean as they come.
There is no one any cleaner.
As you said "you are squeaky clean".
And as they say, that's a fact Jack.
There is no one any cleaner.
As you said "you are squeaky clean".
And as they say, that's a fact Jack.
I need someone near Greenville. Charlotte is the furthest I could go.
I am pretty sure I don't have any std, including herpes. I wonder if a provider would get tested, and send the results to my email. If she is clean as of the test date, my safety is improved greatly. I am surprised there is no service offering
sexual health verification, which any sexually active person could use.
.. . .
I am pretty sure I don't have any std, including herpes. I wonder if a provider would get tested, and send the results to my email. If she is clean as of the test date, my safety is improved greatly. I am surprised there is no service offering
sexual health verification, which any sexually active person could use.
.. . .
The idea is not to engage in more risky behavior.
It is to engage in the same behavior with a lower risk
of infection.
It is a well established principle of medicine, called "herd immunity".
If the people around you are not sick, you will not get sick.
It is certainly safer to have sex with a girl who tested clean 3 days ago than it is
to have sex with a girl you know nothing at all about.
TER gives information about the beauty and behavior of the girls. So why should there not
be information about their contagious diseases?
There are dating sites for people with herpes.
And BTW, I also caught that post on GD as well... 
Did I miss something in your damn post which said anything about you giving YOUR test results over to the companion for her verification of your body? I'm sorry but you idiots are getting to be a tad bit much. Just like a damn post on the GD board about an asshole in Atlanta that just got pulled. I think I'm about ready to create a riot of my own. On dumbasses like you all. If you your mind cannot handle this world, then don't bother being in it. Strap up dude. All you can do is protect yourself with everything given to YOU to do so. Condoms, dental dam, etc etc. If that's not good enough, then stop HOBBYING. Go fish!
Good luck by the way. I'm not about ganging up on anyone but man this Tuesday lunch break TER passing by has been quite much for my eyes. Wtf is going on?
The idea is not to engage in more risky behavior.
It is to engage in the same behavior with a lower risk
of infection.
It is a well established principle of medicine, called "herd immunity".
If the people around you are not sick, you will not get sick.
It is certainly safer to have sex with a girl who tested clean 3 days ago than it is
to have sex with a girl you know nothing at all about.
TER gives information about the beauty and behavior of the girls. So why should there not
be information about their contagious diseases?
There are dating sites for people with herpes.
Good luck by the way. I'm not about ganging up on anyone but man this Tuesday lunch break TER passing by has been quite much for my eyes. Wtf is going on?
I need someone near Greenville. Charlotte is the furthest I could go.
I am pretty sure I don't have any std, including herpes. I wonder if a provider would get tested, and send the results to my email. If she is clean as of the test date, my safety is improved greatly. I am surprised there is no service offering
sexual health verification, which any sexually active person could use.
.. . .
I am pretty sure I don't have any std, including herpes. I wonder if a provider would get tested, and send the results to my email. If she is clean as of the test date, my safety is improved greatly. I am surprised there is no service offering
sexual health verification, which any sexually active person could use.
.. . .
The idea is not to engage in more risky behavior.
It is to engage in the same behavior with a lower risk
of infection.
It is a well established principle of medicine, called "herd immunity".
If the people around you are not sick, you will not get sick.
It is certainly safer to have sex with a girl who tested clean 3 days ago than it is
to have sex with a girl you know nothing at all about.
TER gives information about the beauty and behavior of the girls. So why should there not
be information about their contagious diseases?
There are dating sites for people with herpes.
Shhhh Jamie, we won't tell, I mean it's all good, you got those papers on Monday, right?
Now this is with any human, not just a provider, or a man or a woman....
Let us say for the sake of argument, this person is named... Jamie Doe.
(I just picked it because it is unisex. No particular reason, just random ok.)
Jamie Doe has testing done on Monday for STD's, and receives the results the same day (this is fiction ok)
Jamie is negative for all communicable diseases.
After Monday, Jamie continues to be sexually active.
On Monday we know 100% sure that Jamie is disease free.
So if Jamie has sex, each time adds a potential percentage for "catching something."
Jamie is no longer 100% percent sure of being "clean."
You have no idea to Jamie's activities behind closed doors, so what percentage, noone knows.
Am I wrong?
Just because Jamie tested clean on Monday, on Thursday, let us compare Jamie to another random unknown person, Shannon.
Who has a lesser chance of being infected with STD's?
You are pitting something that has a known variable + unknown,
against an unknown (or so you think, I am about to correct that misconception.)
The reason I say this is, You have no idea who or what Jamie has been doing since Monday.
Let me fill you in...
Jamie has since Monday been ran through by a pack of bare-backing bulls, who like it in front, back, creampies, and anal. So many, Jamie lost count.
Shhhh Jamie, we won't tell, I mean it's all good, you got those papers on Monday, right?
Shannon, meanwhile, come to find, is a gal, a verified provider, with many reviews, and shockingly, a webpage, an online presence, and no incident reports from any clients nor warnings over the course of a couple years.
Shockingly, now the unknown, becomes known, or at least a somewhat safe assumption, that Shannon is also clean.
Just because YOU don't know, doesn't mean that Shannon DOESN'T.
Shannon is a professional who not only values her own health, but that of her clientele, and her business.
You may have apparently made the "smart" (or probability of less chance) gamble/bet, in your own mind, but this is where you are wrong & uninformed.
The things you didn't know... That you didn't know.
I would be willing to bet, I know 20 civvie girls who bareback with random guys from the club, and not a single reputable provider who will do so....
I wonder why that is?
I applaud you wanting to protect your own safety, but having papers from X amount of days ago and thinking that is quantitative to a lesser percentage of infection is bullshit.
All it takes is one dirty dick / dirty pussy to become infected.
So the only percentage you can "bank on" and look smarter, is 0% chances; i.e. abstinence.
Quit acting like they didn't teach this shit in school.
Drop your nuts and do it, or stay on the fucking porch.
Good fucking grief.
Foxy
Minimize my ass!!!!
smh
Let us say for the sake of argument, this person is named... Jamie Doe.
(I just picked it because it is unisex. No particular reason, just random ok.)
Jamie Doe has testing done on Monday for STD's, and receives the results the same day (this is fiction ok)
Jamie is negative for all communicable diseases.
After Monday, Jamie continues to be sexually active.
On Monday we know 100% sure that Jamie is disease free.
So if Jamie has sex, each time adds a potential percentage for "catching something."
Jamie is no longer 100% percent sure of being "clean."
You have no idea to Jamie's activities behind closed doors, so what percentage, noone knows.
Am I wrong?
Just because Jamie tested clean on Monday, on Thursday, let us compare Jamie to another random unknown person, Shannon.
Who has a lesser chance of being infected with STD's?
You are pitting something that has a known variable + unknown,
against an unknown (or so you think, I am about to correct that misconception.)
The reason I say this is, You have no idea who or what Jamie has been doing since Monday.
Let me fill you in...
Jamie has since Monday been ran through by a pack of bare-backing bulls, who like it in front, back, creampies, and anal. So many, Jamie lost count.
Shhhh Jamie, we won't tell, I mean it's all good, you got those papers on Monday, right?
Shannon, meanwhile, come to find, is a gal, a verified provider, with many reviews, and shockingly, a webpage, an online presence, and no incident reports from any clients nor warnings over the course of a couple years.
Shockingly, now the unknown, becomes known, or at least a somewhat safe assumption, that Shannon is also clean.
Just because YOU don't know, doesn't mean that Shannon DOESN'T.
Shannon is a professional who not only values her own health, but that of her clientele, and her business.
You may have apparently made the "smart" (or probability of less chance) gamble/bet, in your own mind, but this is where you are wrong & uninformed.
The things you didn't know... That you didn't know.
I would be willing to bet, I know 20 civvie girls who bareback with random guys from the club, and not a single reputable provider who will do so....
I wonder why that is?
I applaud you wanting to protect your own safety, but having papers from X amount of days ago and thinking that is quantitative to a lesser percentage of infection is bullshit.
All it takes is one dirty dick / dirty pussy to become infected.
So the only percentage you can "bank on" and look smarter, is 0% chances; i.e. abstinence.
Quit acting like they didn't teach this shit in school.
Drop your nuts and do it, or stay on the fucking porch.
Good fucking grief.
Foxy
Minimize my ass!!!!
smh
From cartoon that has found a home in my mind: HE: Shows girl his nice sized Tool
SHE: Admires IT and goes "OOOoooouuuu
)" with smile on her face.
HE: Brags that He has one and She does not)
SHE: Looks sad, THEN!!!
SHE: Pulls up dress and show her PU SAY and says....
SHE: With one of THESE(PU SAYS), I can get all those(HE TOOLS) that I Want---SHE with smile on face)
HE: Looks sad, as Tool drops it's head in shame(--LOL
Remember Guys---PU SAYS RULE) I'm a Loyal Subject;P~~~
I agree his request will more than likely never happen but why do you have to be so attacking in most every post to him? It's not just stating an opinion here but it's more like trying to be some kind of angry online bully. With the attitude and way over the top emphasis on being outspoken I guarantee you it will cause a loss in potential business in the future for some who may read this and see you trying to get your point across by doing so in a middle school girl manner. By all means please attack me as well and highlight my point.
I agree his request will more than likely never happen but why do you have to be so attacking in most every post to him? It's not just stating an opinion here but it's more like trying to be some kind of angry online bully. With the attitude and way over the top emphasis on being outspoken I guarantee you it will cause a loss in potential business in the future for some who may read this and see you trying to get your point across by doing so in a middle school girl manner. By all means please attack me as well and highlight my point.
-- Modified on 5/9/2015 10:36:19 AM