not that easy if you're on the receiving end!!!
I believe that some reviews are just mean. shouldn't the provider be able to rebuttal Just saying
It has occurred to people apart from you that other humans aren't always completely honest
At least not by myself and not by a lot of other guys who post here.
Great reviews or mean ones, the guy may well have motivation to lie. I don't always believe.
As far as whether a provider should have a chance to respond, sure they should in a fair and perfect world. Unfortunately, that's not where we live. It would be good in a lot of situations, but there would be a lot of train wrecks. I know it's super frustrating, trust me. Maybe best to think of it as occupational hazard. Sorry.
At the suggestion that some reviews are not completely accurate. Who would have ever guessed?
...if we can't trust mongers & pooners, well then who the hell can we trust?
I would add a third section to the review which would be titled, "Providers Comments".
After the review was posted, she would have a chance to give her comments or not provider her comments on the review.
She could say, " great time with a wonderful gentleman" or she could say, " no, he did not fuck me the ass bare back" or she could say nothing at all.
We are all (well most of us that stick around for any time) intelligent people who can read between the lines and decide for ourselves the probably truth of the matter.
For other services allow a vendor to respond to a negative review.
I would have a box for the lady to check or mark which one occurred or if the review is accurate.
Don't want to have a long he said/she said type of review or dialog
Here are my options, feel free to add one that could be better... no wise cracks here.
Accurate
Somewhat Accurate
Not exactly
Met but couldn't fuck
Never met
I read them all, or at least recent ones. Then take the average.
First, as others have said what lead you to believe reviews are taken as truth by any of us, much less most of us? As SH notes (based on the subj at least) I, and I suspect most hobbyists, read a number of the reviews, and all if there are not many that are dated. I also check the review pattern of the review's other reviews to form an opinion of the provider.
You should not have the option to "rebut" the review. This isn't a debate board and it's the review's experience not the providers. HOWEVER, a provider has the right, and deservedly so, contest a fake and fraudulent review by taking the issue to TER. If they are presented with sufficient evidence the review will be removed. Perfect solution? No. Good solution? Yes.
Because I take all of the ones I read with a grain of salt.
I checked the reviewer's history and checked their patterns. I learned to see the pattern of the providers and ignore the weird reviews that didn't fit.
As I gained experience and saw several providers, I checked the reviewers that had seen the ladies I had seen and had similar experiences. I started to trust their reviews of other providers and they were mostly similar to my experiences.
I really don't trust reviewers that have one or two reviews, whether they give a positive or negative review. It is quite a small world once I get to know who are fairly reliable reviewers and that their tastes are similar to mine.
I don't think a response space for the providers would be workable. It's a shit fight looking for a place to happen.
I have compiled a list over the years of reviewers who seem to like the same types of girls I like, so I give more weight to their reviews when researching new girls I'm thinking about seeing. It has served me well for several years now.
Another red flag for me are reviewers that have been out of the game for awhile and are just starting back and guys that only have a half-dozen or less reviews a year. Some low-volume hobbyists have unrealistic expectations of every girl they see and so the scores tend to be lower, while others aren't consistent because of the time lapse between providers.
You can tell by the details in the review if he gave her a low score when she didn't deserve it. Also, it is important to see the reviewers reviews as some just can't handle giving anything above a 6. I have a few reviewers who rated me far above the next one, but still wasn't a 9 or a 10. Even if you are know to give great experiences, some won't give 7's or above because they are that picky or don't understand the rating system. I am sure some were bad but I know of at least one lady who, according to the details, was a 9 and he gave a 6.
Of course you have the ones who score 10's to everyone for basically nothing. Just an odd system. Some guys score properly, others under or over score. That's why it is important to read the details.
Another red flag for me are reviewers that have been out of the game for awhile and are just starting back and guys that only have a half-dozen or less reviews a year. Some low-volume hobbyists have unrealistic expectations of every girl they see and so the scores tend to be lower, while others aren't consistent because of the time lapse between providers.
You have to look at a reviewer's entire history. Many guys have never given a score above a 7 or 8, so for these guys, a score of 7 might be like my 9. It relative to the range he uses overall. Many guys think you can only give one 10 in your hobby career because they take the "Once in a Lifetime" description literally.
Now that is not going to happen. Because of the new scoring requirements there "might" be more objective numbers.
I'm trying to decide who I want to set up a MFM to score a provider a 10. Greek is way to easy, may as make it interesting.
not that easy if you're on the receiving end!!!
except for all the others.
If I like her look and menu and and as long as she doesn't have multiple shit-show reviews, I don't pay too much attention to actual scores or one man's opinion.
Rebuttals only work if she knows his TER handle and even that doesn't work if he posts the review under an alias. Life isn't fair. Your best defenses against bad reviews are accurate pictures, honest website/menu, and service with a smile.
At this point I believe more of the reviews are fabricated either in whole are part, than are factual.