I think it's as simple as that. The "answers" you're referring to are pretty set in stone and not always indicative of what ladies actually offer.
i know i know, but i am slightly confused about new policy...so if any or all answers to dfk, multiple guys, really bi, anal and bbbj say no, but is mentioned in a review, a provider is eligible for credit of those activities?...i just read 2 reviews where anal is a no, but it is mentioned in the review...and where the hell is the chemistry point?
Jack's going to love that I said this. LMAO
I think it's as simple as that. The "answers" you're referring to are pretty set in stone and not always indicative of what ladies actually offer.
It doesn't even have to be DFK. The standard is kiss with tongue so it includes LFK.
As far as her profile/answers, they are set by the first review. The provider can request modifications and any monger can submit a problem report if he/she (can't forget lopaw) discovers an obvious error or point out a change in services.
If guys mention something, then her profile should reflect that. With anal, many gals will offer it to some guys, but not others, for reasons that should be obvious. However, the guys who get it are often wise enough not to put it in the review. However, some do. Maybe write to her first.
Previously a provider could receive a 10 just by offering the qualifying services. Now, she must "perform" them during a session. The problem with that is providers can just ask the reviewer to write that anal occurred (or two guys or two girls really bi) to boost her performance score. If not all inclusive, a provider can benefit from this by asking for a lot extra for Greek (for those actually interested).
"Problem with that is"
Of course, before the provider could just outright ask the reviewer to give them a 10. I don't know whether a guy would be more or less inclined to invent a sexual act compared to inflating a score. The latter is definitely easier.
The latter is also safer for the provider. If she's getting a lot of 10s for anal and that's what someone really wants and schedules with her it could lead to very bad results if the wrong John walks through the door.
I'm pretty sure this was pointed out before about the inaccurate profiles that then allowed the 10s but at least in that case if none of the reviews actually mentioned it I suspect many reading the reviews inferred it really wasn't on the menu.
We were talking about incentives for cheating. If the lady doesn't want guys coming to her demanding anal sex, that's a good reason not to tell clients to lie in their reviews, isn't it? That makes fake 10s at least a little less likely than under the former system, where liars wouldn't be punished with Greek tourists.
and never advertised it, you can likely guess it was to be able to get the 10. They are going to game the systam whatever way they can.
It is "possible" she offered Greek previously for extra and in certain circumstances and just told them not to mention in review... but I doubt that if it has never been advertised/mentioned prior to TER rating change.
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion_boards/viewmsg.asp?MessageID=896771&boardID=12&page=2#896771
WTF's up with getting a point for "Multiple Guys".
I am sorry but I just don't get that at all.
Having another hard-on in the room does absolutely nothing for me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Must be a European thing?????
To each his own I guess or maybe I should say " my HOuse is your HOuse"
Now RIMMING, I vote for a point!!
Well, that's the confusing thing about rimming in the TER reviews, at least the last time I had VIP to check.
If it means she's rimming guys asses then I don't want to be her next customer and she should get points extracted.
If she likes being rimmed then by all means she gets extra points for that.
Certainly not a European thing that I found popular when I grew up, but I was in conservative Great Britain!
I don't want rimming, I can't see nor can I reach my asshole region to trim the jungle down, and for that reason I'd be too self conscious to let someone lick me there.
As for multiple guys, heck yeah, not for the guys but for her taking on multiple guys. I've done a DP session and it was great, the other guy was a faceless (to me) prop, the thrill for me was her being a slut and taking two cocks and the way she got off, an incredible, unmistakable real orgasm.
We can celebrate our differences.
...must be provided during the session being reviewed was effective almost immediately the other changes about chemistry rating, location rating, etc. don't take effect until the new version of TER goes live.
(I've been using the beta version for about a day and a half and I'm beginning to like it.)
...because there are just too many ways to abuse or circumvent it. It appears that it's here to stay. Oh well.
Maybe they'll throw us a bone and instate a PM search instead.
(completely unrelated but very much needed, nonetheless 
)
And suddenly all their reviews since January say they're now getting fucked in the ass. What a joke!
provider is allowed to change her menu, hair color, CBJ to BBBJ, etc. but she should notify TER admin to adjust the profile accordingly.
Can someone explain how to even get a 10/10 review now on TER?
...during the session. You with one male client can kiss with tongue, do a bbbj, and engage in anal intercourse. That is 3 added to the 7 which is maximum if you don't do any of those 3 things. 7 + 3 = 10
There are other ways to get a 10 in performance but they involve more than one client being present at the same time.
The 10 in appearance is completely subjective. If the client thinks you're a 10 he'll give you a 10.
why do you NEED 10/10?
If you're pretty, likeable, and provide good service it'll come through in reviews and in return clients.
...being with a male/female or female/female couple would satisfy a "really bi" claim :
-- Modified on 2/16/2017 7:41:08 AM