some hanky panky may be afoot with respect to providers doing well in contests? Does this mean there is no longer integrity and fair play among providers in this illegal business? I'm so disappointed in myself for not realizing this sooner as you have.
-- Modified on 2/2/2017 2:23:33 PM
I have a couple of questions...
On Ms Photogenic, I've heard rumors of some campaigns in the past to garner Likes on the Photo board. Now that the winner will be determined only by number of likes, that makes it more likely the winner will not be determined only by what's posted on the Photo board, but by how effectively providers work behind the scenes for votes. I guess "get out the vote" campaigns are to be expected whenever voting is concerned, but in this case shouldn't it be "the eyes have it"?
On Ms TER, which now requires video interviews, I'm wondering how well that will sit with providers. Faces can be masked, but how about voices? I know providers who have distinctive voices. Now that I think about it, I've seen very few videos of providers that include their voices. The ones I can think of were for providers who are also porn stars. Of course, anyone who's concerned about her voice being recognized can choose not to participate.
On the plus side, the new Ms TER rules should drive lots more traffic to the Media board and give those providers who choose to participate a fun way to express themselves.
30-40 likes used to be impressive then it nudged up to 50+ and then in one quantum leap we had women getting 100+ likes EVERY single day. Where does it stop before Admin puts their foot down?
Every time TER makes a "top list" or offers some kind of award, someone comes in and makes a mockery of the system. I see the same fate in store for MS TER and the related awards revolving around the likes on the Photo Board.
some hanky panky may be afoot with respect to providers doing well in contests? Does this mean there is no longer integrity and fair play among providers in this illegal business? I'm so disappointed in myself for not realizing this sooner as you have.
-- Modified on 2/2/2017 2:23:33 PM
you're not going get hosed once in awhile by picking out a hot provider from her photos and then when you meet her she has a nasally, annoying voice, making you wish you had only booked 30 minutes instead of two hours? We've all been there. Its part of the fun sometimes to see how different reality is from our expectations.
why would you think anything was introduced
to induce the inflation ... I think Miss 100+ came
from no PB presence to 100 almost overnight ...
and she and others like her are HOTTT.
I don't care either Jack. I'm not sure that many of
the posting ladies do either.
let the gals decide what the content should be. Too many rules, and I don't want to watch an interview. I say any video, up to two minutes. Could be one hell of a lot of fun.
I don't think the photo board will change a bit.
As for "Ms Photogenic" and "Ms TER".... I never really paid much attention to it before, I don't see that changing.
So basically when a winner claims "Oh I wasn't even trying to win".... pfft.
I am not into the gals who harass guys for perfect scores, pay for fake reviews, or paying for votes.
I am not also ok with the guys who try to hold a review over our head to get what they want either or do revenge reviews.
I very much wish TER would do more about these things. I thought you get banned for stuff like that, but there are people who get caught and not much happens. Others get banned.
I am not into the gals who harass guys for perfect scores, pay for fake reviews, or paying for votes.
I am not also ok with the guys who try to hold a review over our head to get what they want either or do revenge reviews.
I very much wish TER would do more about these things. I thought you get banned for stuff like that, but there are people who get caught and not much happens. Others get banned.
"If you write me a real good review I will give you a white list".
It is still less than 90 days since this encounter and I haven't decided whether I should write the review.
I thought that was against TER rules?
Maybe I'm wrong!
"If you write me a really good review, I will give you a whitelist"
"TER has a policy against exchanging good reviews for favors (free or discounted meetings, etc.) or anything of value." I think most people would agree that white lists have value for the recipient (in almost all cases at least).
every time you give a "like", an angel gets her wings.
Ive heard what it takes to make that spot of ter. For the monthly provider. I w
Ive heard what it takes to make that spot of ter. For the monthly provider. I would stay very clear of it. And what's up with the new 10. 10 girls not getting 10 10s now because of the change in rules? Ugh?!