These are good questions. However, I am wondering if Gina and the proprietor of Date Check have certain questions that would encompass their occupations. However one can easily get around this if the already have a history of seeing girls. That way it is easier to obtain a cover. However in bigger cities I am thinking that they might let woman who practice the trade on this tier of the profession be a little less stringent. I am thinking this because these are the girls that men who are upper middle class or better and usually are in positions of power would frequent women who work within this stratification. That is why in the larger cities they might call it off. Not that it is an absolute,especially in the election season,but more times than not they tend to go for the low hanging fruit.
This question is to providers:
How would a person who worked at the FBI, the Justicce Department, or just a cop be vetted and be able to see a provider.
Or are they not allowed in the hobby?
How would a person who worked at the FBI, the Justicce Department, or just a cop be vetted and be able to see a provider.
Or are they not allowed in the hobby?
xoxo
I don't think they could I just don't see how that could possibly happen but I'm sure there's some people to conjure up something for heavily watched and they're very careful so I don't think they could
These are good questions. However, I am wondering if Gina and the proprietor of Date Check have certain questions that would encompass their occupations. However one can easily get around this if the already have a history of seeing girls. That way it is easier to obtain a cover. However in bigger cities I am thinking that they might let woman who practice the trade on this tier of the profession be a little less stringent. I am thinking this because these are the girls that men who are upper middle class or better and usually are in positions of power would frequent women who work within this stratification. That is why in the larger cities they might call it off. Not that it is an absolute,especially in the election season,but more times than not they tend to go for the low hanging fruit.
I'm a DC-based provider, so perhaps I have a higher chance of running into someone affiliated with a federal law-enforcement agency, and this is something I might have had to wrestle with. I think there's a big difference between seeing someone in a verifiable role that has nothing to do with various types of vice enforcement or trafficking, versus seeing someone more-likely to be involved in a bust.
Hypothetically speaking, I'd feel comfortable seeing someone who is, for instance, an IT contractor for DoJ. Or someone in management and such. Being up-front about all of this and other screening requests would take me a long way towards being comfortable booking an appointment.
When I was you'd have NEVER seen me tell a provider, submit my ID or identify myself in any way.
An FBI agent is under even much more scrutiny. I'd question his judgement if he told the girl who he was.
People who are willing to risk all concern me.
What other bad decisions might he make?
tp://www1.salary.com/Police-Officer-Salary.html
Many times you can double that base figure due to overtime. That's why cops love handing out DUIs. The court date for you means overtime pay for several hours of doing nothing, but drinking coffee and eating donuts while they wait for your 15 minutes of fame where they say you were drunk.
I lost count on how many articles there have been on cops pimping, run escort agencies, procuring services as johns and getting busted as a result. Goes to show you they are not doing there home work to stay out of trouble.
-- Modified on 10/5/2016 11:47:43 PM
I require verified references, but I have no issues seeing them.