Maybe it's something providers have offered before but I only seem to have noticed it recently.
Some providers advertise that they will provide rimming but not OWO Assuming the rimming is carried out without any protection (as the adverts never say so), is rimming safer / cleaner than an uncovered cockAfter all, what could you possibly catch by licking someone's butthole?
Its not like human fecal matter carries any known diseases, that's why washing your hands after wiping your ass is such a waste of time.
Come on dude, are you fucking serious.
Don't get me wrong, I have had my share of rim jobs, but just think about your question for a minute, now go smack yourself in the head. lol
Just adding my 2 cents.
-- Modified on 9/3/2016 11:12:13 PM
That you can get rimming you can't get from clean genitals. For example e-coli (almost if not everyone has e-coli bacteria in there lower digestive track), hepatitis A, and tape worms can all be caught through rimming but rarely if ever from traditional oral sex. And that list is no where near conclusive. I am not telling anyone to do it or not to do it, but I am making sure people look at its special risks and know what they can be signing up for.
Is that it is similar risk wise to bbbj...just a guess though!
BBBJ AFTER BBGreek most likely carries the same risk as rimming. lol
Come on, does anyone REALLY believe that jizz has anywhere near the germs as SHIT???!!!
Well with a simple google search of the risks of both the same list shows up...chlamydia,herpes and all the rest of them would be a possibility....only difference is g.i issues can occour with rimming potentially.....thats the info that i found.
Yes for sure hep A would be a much higher risk to consider when it comes to rimming as it is spread by fecal matter. Hep b could be transmitted through bbbj and rimming both....to the origional poster only you can make that judgement call on what risk you are willing to take but this may be a better question for your doc
But to the question of why you would offer rimming and not bbbj? Couldnt tell you! Doesnt make much sense.....
Sounds like she prefers E. Coli over Chlamydi
-- Modified on 9/3/2016 10:01:17 PM
I forgot to include in my original post but I'd really like to get the opinion of any providers and/or anyone with a medical background or qualifications
thank
I don't have a medical degree, but I think I see about as many pussies a year as most OBGYN's. In fact, Before me, you needed a blood test to determine STD's. I developed the taste test. Just as effective, and completely safe for the woman.
As long as you remove all traces of fecal matter with a thorough washing, rimming is much safer than uncovered sex, for both parties. If I am going to see a provider who rims, I do a thorough cleaning MYSELF before I go. I've had too many surprise me in the past by pulling their tongue out of my ass and shoving it in my mouth without warning. I've seen what comes out of there, and it's not pretty
Not saying they don't exist, but I have never seen a review or an ad where a provider offers rimming but no bbbj.
I just did a search with the only parameters being "blowjob, yes with condom" and "rimming, yes gives" and I got 1899 returns! Surprising, and sounds ridiculous to me.
I think it sounds bizarre, but I've heard where some stopped doing CIM and other stuff after being unpleasantly surprised by dark red cum from customers who didn't bother to warn them. Maybe the idea is that an ass can be cleansed well first, but showers won't fix bloody cum. Just a guess .
Personally, I don't like rimming from a hygiene perspective. I've had it done TO me many times. Feels interesting. I can take it or leave, butt (pun) even prefer to leave it. Mostly, I want to be DFKing her mouth and not tasting my own ass
Are you asking about things like ecoli contamination, your normal STDs or something else?
I suppose this is the question
I can understand why a provider might not provide OWO but I would presume in that case they wouldn't offer rimming either, my question ultimately is why would you offer one but not the oth
Reason number one... They are stupid.
Reason number two... They are ignorant of the relative risks involved.
Reason number three... They have an ass licking fetish and it turns them on more then a BBBJ does so one is worth the risk to them and the other isn't.
It is one of those three. I don't know the lady or ladies in question so I can't speak to which.
-- Modified on 9/4/2016 1:44:56 AM
Some providers advertise that they will provide rimming but not OWO
Assuming the rimming is carried out without any protection (as the adverts never say so), is rimming safer / cleaner than an uncovered cock?
Some providers advertise that they will provide rimming but not OWO
Assuming the rimming is carried out without any protection (as the adverts never say so), is rimming safer / cleaner than an uncovered cock?
Never had it done to me and never wanted to but I do like to give and so I've thought a lot about the risks.
Any normal human being has a natural aversion to what comes out of that particular orifice but if you stop and think about it, is it really any more of a breeding ground for dangerous pathogens than the other orifices where you stick your tongue? The mouth is a well known breeding ground for bacteria and if you engage in tongue to tongue actions an exchange of bacterium is virtually guaranteed. As any woman who has had a yeast infection will tell you, the vagina is also a great breeding ground for nasty things, not to mention that blood comes out of it on a regular basis.
As strange as it may seem, if you consider all three, the anus may actually be the safest place of the 3 to stick your tongue.
As for it being the place where pathogens are naturally eliminated from the body, those parasites actually cycled through the person eliminating them without causing any harm so why would it not be true in most cases, that a second re-cycling through the same type of filtration system of another person wouldn't cause that person any harm. Obviously, the second person could have a susceptibility to something that the first one didn't have but that would be true of all three orifices, would it not?
-- Modified on 9/4/2016 6:28:18 PM
-- Modified on 9/4/2016 6:30:01 PM