The last reviewer saw her 9 years after her previous review. It was his first and last review, which probably says something
I'm in the midwest this week. When looking through the reviews I see one lady whose reviews are something like a wall of 3/2s. She's not that bad looking, but it's clear she doesn't get it as a provider.
After almost 2 full pages of 3/2s (and she just had a name change and new phone number to boot), I'm starting to wonder if guys are posting fake reviews just for the 15 free days.
How many bad reviews of a single provider should be allowed before you're not able to review her anymore?
I remember this game was played on Redbook many years ago, there were like 4 pages of reviews of a ROB. I think it became a running joke after a while.
And then want to anounce that fact to the world. As long as she has her adds up she should be subject to review if she is earning her reviews.
-- Modified on 8/25/2016 10:04:28 PM
At least a 7 for performance, then I don't write a review, unless there has been a material misrepresentations by the provider. I have no interest in beating up on a provider that gave an honest effort but just doesn't measure up.
If X # reviews have EXACTLY the same rating, whether they're 3/2 or 10/10 or whatever, that the next review must vary, showing a different opinion of either the provider's appearance or her service, or it cannot be submitted.
So say X=4. And the provider you saw has 4 consecutive reviews giving her 8/9, and you sit down to do the review and you would also give her an 8/9. So why is that review necessary or valuable to anyone doing research? Nothing new to be gleaned from reading it, right? So if you really feel it is necessary to write the review it means you have some sort of new information to share, so it then is likely that this new information should alter the rating.
For example, if you find she has beautiful eyes but doesn't give the world's greatest blowjob, you might give her a 9/8 just for enough variety to make it interesting.
And it would stop cold the negotiations some providers do when they say something like, "If you're don't intend to give me a 10/10 I'd rather you didn't review me."
And in the case you mentioned, a 3/2 lady could easily spruce up and muster a performance worthy of a 4/4 or something. If she can't, maybe this failure of effort warrants a 3/1.
So for me a Redundancy Rule seems more interesting than a Mercy Rule,
i was told there would be no math...
eah, something like that. TER is a very useful guide, but they're better when they're in a market* where they're NOT the dominant resource (funny how that works lmaooooooooo).
All those 10/10s...like with some of the K-gal agencies...give a 7/7 and you might get blacklisted. And of course, if you spent a stupid amount on an escort (like 4 figures), of course you're going to post a 10/10**.
In my 15 years since the advent of TER, there have been maybe 3 10s for service.
*IMO, TER owns LA, NYC and Chicago. They're very useful in someplace like Dallas or Miami, where there is a dominant regional/local board.
**just my opinion...like I have said many times over the years, TER is a retail board, and I think this needs to be respected. I just like to think I played the game better than most, but these days, it's all good to me. There's a lot of reading between the lines here, and if you don't understand that, chances are you're going to be frustrated.
...over 60 reviews with "ones" for performance. Then they realized how stupid they were for continuing to see her so they came up with grade inflation.
The last reviewer saw her 9 years after her previous review. It was his first and last review, which probably says something
I doubt if someone saw her in 2014.
I think it's a Chevy-Mercedes concept.
Some guys will continue to see a low rated provider because she's affordable (for them).
Why else would they disregard a slew of low level reviews?
Some guys will continue to see a low rated provider because she's affordable (for them).
Why else would they disregard a slew of low level reviews?
The best of the best can have a bad day.
The answer is stupidity. And I have been as guilty as hell of it.
I once seen a girl who had nothing but bad review scores and complaints about old photos and poor service. But each reviewer brought up a trait that I was looking for so I book in spite of her reviews. I was sorry I did. It was a horrible time. She looked nothing like her photos, she was done after 10 minutes of a 60 minute session and I never got mine.
But I was warned. I was the stupid fuck. I knew better and did it anyway. I never reviewed her as she claimed she was retiring and was marrying the guy in the hotel hall. So between her already accurate reviews and her soon to be retirement I never reviewed. Yes, I am a stupid fuck sometimes.
One other cause, ignorance. Not everyone knows of review sites like this. I didn't my first time and I got robbed. No review as I didn't know I could. But if I found out about TER or another review site shortly after I would have definitely reviewed her.
-- Modified on 8/26/2016 10:06:34 AM
Even if a review has a similar rating to a previous review, it does show the current status of a lady, good or bad. Some people change over time, so yet another similar review can still be helpful even if it's redundant.
I think these types of reviews exist because some guys are just hopeful; the girl is frequently so inexpensive that they will risk it since the risk/money is low, or she's so hot they will take a chance. However, I suspect that some guys fabricate reviews on low-priced (and usually low-rated) ladies who are not likely to know about TER; a challenge to the review is very unlikely. Do you really believe ripmany's reviews? I don't, and I think s/he's pure troll and is amused by getting away with it.