TER General Board

no way
lester_prairie 12 Reviews 217 reads
posted

An LE sting BP ad that says no AA would discriminate against whites (target them for arrest.)  Good luck contesting in court about discrimination against whites.

I sometimes come across escort ad's that do not seem legit, but they state No AA, or No Blk, etc.  If the ad was being used as a police sting, would stating No AA or No blk clients, etc. be considered discriminatory and therefore be illegal?

Yes, it might be discriminating, but it is not illegal. Sex for money is illegal and that is the original intent for the sting.

Posted By: mharrisPA
I sometimes come across escort ad's that do not seem legit, but they state No AA, or No Blk, etc.  If the ad was being used as a police sting, would stating No AA or No blk clients, etc. be considered discriminatory and therefore be illegal?

If LE is doing a sting using escort ads, wouldn't they try to make the escort ad seem as real as possible? Since so many BP ads say "no AA" why wouldn't LE put that in their ads? Sure somebody can make a case that they are targeting certain ethnicities, which is discrimination, which is illegal, but when johns are arrested in a sting the damage is usually done with the arrest. It doesn't really matter if you win the case later because the ad that enticed you was discriminating.  

Posted By: mharrisPA
I sometimes come across escort ad's that do not seem legit, but they state No AA, or No Blk, etc.  If the ad was being used as a police sting, would stating No AA or No blk clients, etc. be considered discriminatory and therefore be illegal?

JakeFromStateFarm299 reads

If LE really is "targeting certain ethnicities" by putting "no AA" in their ads, the ethnicity they're targeting would seem to be white people, Asians and Latinos.  They certainly aren't targeting blacks for a prostitution bust because they're telling none of them to show up.

GaGambler265 reads

Maybe they can argue that since black people already make up such inordinate percentage of our prison population they can give them a pass to fuck hookers. Besides "everybody" knows black guys are always the pimps and never the johns, Do I have to teach you everything??? lmao

Actually this argument has been made several times here on the boards and frankly I think there is some merit to it. You can most definitely argue "selective prosecution" if an entire ethnic group is eliminated from the sting/s. I think it would be a very interesting argument in court.

bigguy30286 reads

So most Italian's are in the mob and gangsters?
Also most Asians men have small dicks and build a lot of computers?
I also heard and seen a lot of Asian people, who only fuck white people for status?
How about most Irish people are alcoholics or most white men are serial killers?  
You can't trust most white people in general?

Since you want to be a smart ass all the time.
We can play this stupid stereotypes game, a lot of different ways.  

Posted By: GaGambler
Maybe they can argue that since black people already make up such inordinate percentage of our prison population they can give them a pass to fuck hookers. Besides "everybody" knows black guys are always the pimps and never the johns, Do I have to teach you everything??? lmao  
   
 Actually this argument has been made several times here on the boards and frankly I think there is some merit to it. You can most definitely argue "selective prosecution" if an entire ethnic group is eliminated from the sting/s. I think it would be a very interesting argument in court.


-- Modified on 5/6/2016 8:49:43 AM

on which side of the argument you are on ....I'd certainly prefer not to be the defendant ... lol

Posted By: GaGambler
Maybe they can argue that since black people already make up such inordinate percentage of our prison population they can give them a pass to fuck hookers. Besides "everybody" knows black guys are always the pimps and never the johns, Do I have to teach you everything??? lmao  
   
 Actually this argument has been made several times here on the boards and frankly I think there is some merit to it. You can most definitely argue "selective prosecution" if an entire ethnic group is eliminated from the sting/s. I think it would be a very interesting argument in court.

They ARE targeting certain ethnicities, by eliminating certain ethnicities. I never said they were targeting minorities.
Anyway my point was that I am pretty sure that placing sting ads like that would probably be declared illegal/unconstitutional, if someone gets busted and decides to fight it all the way, but I certainly don't see that possibility preventing LE from placing those types of ads anyway. (Especially in certain jurisdictions.)

I am one who actually uses BP, and of course I always look for red flags. (And yellow and green flags :)) While I do feel that "no AA" in the ad makes it "less likely" to be an LE sting ad, I certainly wouldn't consider it a guaranty that it is not LE. There are a lot of things I look for, and it is usually a combination of things that make me move forward or put on the brakes.

Damage already done is a great point.  Just looking for a loophole when I see a tempting ad!

Skyfyre220 reads

for the mistaken belief that Law Enforcement has to obey the laws.

Au contraire Law Enforcement make the law and is above and beyond it. The law only applies to ordinary citizen.

Just ask #BlackLivesMatter (LOL

Then factor in that the courts have said LE can lie so this is a nothing burger.

An LE sting BP ad that says no AA would discriminate against whites (target them for arrest.)  Good luck contesting in court about discrimination against whites.

Register Now!