But Sasha knows I can be a little over explanatory and get on a roll when I talk about people who are out of line lmfao
have you ever come across reviews where the reviewer explicity admits he has been with the provider reviewed multiple times, yet the review he wrote is to describe a bad session. The reviewers explain how wonderful she is and how amazing she was in previous sessions, but still the review has a poor score and there's lots of bitching about how that session wasn't as good as the previous ones.
why would guys not write a review when they had good sessions? is it because they are waiting for a poor session before they review the provider? i have seen this in reviews one too many times so i thought i would raise up the topic here and see what people think of this.
you guys think this is the standard for reviews of you think that guys who do this have alternate intentions? sorry... Guys and Girls 
TER requires that any new review replace the earlier one. There is no VIP days credit given either.
But otherwise, I agree, it's very strange to only write a poor review instead of a good one.
It seems the two most common reasons for guys to write a bad review on a girl they have seen several times are:
1. They have pressured the girl for services that are not on the menu under the belief that she will agree after he has seen her a half-dozen times, but she has turned them down, so he retaliates with a bad review.
2. Guys, especially newbies, over the course of several sessions lose track of the where the line is between fantasy and reality. They didn't write a review before because they have fallen in love at first sight and want to keep the girl for themselves. At some point, they make a grand gesture (marriage proposal, come live with me, lets start dating, etc.) and the response is something like, "Dude, get a grip. This is just a fantasy service". They get their feelings hurt, get angry over the rebuff to their affections, and write a bad review in retaliation.
I'm sure there are other reasons, but I have discussed this with some providers when they seemed to have only one or two outliers that were bad, with the rest of their reviews being pretty consistent, and this has been the two reasons most often given for the bad ones.
Some veterans, myself included, will often wait to write a review until after the second date, because some providers can be a little shy on the first meeting with a new customer, and you just know the second meeting will be better than the first. If I think she has given me the best experience she is capable of, I will write the review after the first meeting.
First of all guys can't review a regular every time he sees her
Secondly we all hope he will be honest that the latest session wasn't great
Why? Maybe it was just a bad time, maybe she's getting burned out, maybe she's tired of him
But if he's seen her multiple times and there was no explanation to the point where he felt satisfied with the situation he should review it that way
I'm starting to get concerned that you girls think you're going to get super duper every time someone reviews you.
That's not real life.
I agree with the previous comment that it may be an update, but I don't know if there is any way to tell that unless the reviewer mentions so.
It also appears that some guys want to keep their current FAV for themselves (or the providers asked that he does not submit a review) and he only write a review once the service goes downhill. In the case you describe what is the reviewer's history, few reviews and generally poor service reports or is this an outlier?
What is the provider's history?
As with all reviews, we need to take everything in context.
Nearly every time I read one of those reviews, I read an immature, passive-aggressive response to some perceived sleight or denied desire. I don't generally see them as intentionally punitive or manipulative, just whining in response to something the authors are too immature to handle - whether that is disappointment that "the blush has left the rose" after a few sessions, she "won't try that", or she simply let him know his fantasy wasn't real. Denying those facts and leaving them out of the review is what makes the review so noticeably one-sided from among every one-sided review ever written.
No, it isn't fair or right. It is however, something we all should expect from time to time - our little world is just a reflection of the larger one and maturity runs a broad spectrum among us. Don't stoop to battle immaturity
I don't really disagree with what others have said; I think those views can be fairly easily verified by reading the review and, if possible, reading any subsequent discussion threat that might emerge. That said (and perhaps this is a version of hurt feelings) it's also true providers can be lazy at times. This has also been discussed recently. On top of that, some of the hobbyists here think they are obligated to provide bad reviews along with good reviews and there is a argument to be made for that (though I don't really agree with it).
So I think it's a bit hard to really say what's going on in any particular case but it's not always a case of getting even or being vindictive.
when you see the provider on a regular basis, whether it be weekly, monthly, or 10X a month. You may expect a less than stellar performance may occur.
Even your ATF can't be on her game every time, nor can you bring your A game to every appointment when you see someone often.
I get the prevalent school of thought around here, that it's what you're paying for. With all the extra benefits frequency may bring into the hobby, one may want to be prepared for "an" off night.
At the end of the day, stop your fucking whining, stuff you "bullshit" review up you butt and move on. That's your choice. What an ingrate! That is if you even know the difference between the an occasional evening with a kady or an ongoing affair.
Should all those great times be ruined because of one average performance. That's chicken shit. What kind of a friend is a person that kicks people as they walk out the door. Just graciously leave.
And for the contrarians among us, this ain't me saying a negative review has no place on TER. It , probably" shouldn't happen with an ATF, regular, or someone you say you dig.
Did I miss something? When did you start poopin' ice cream.
-- Modified on 4/27/2016 2:50:57 PM
For me, the reason to read reviews is to decide on whether to see a lady for the first time. I want to know how it was the first time the reviewer saw her because that is the situation in which I will be if I choose to see the lady.
If a review starts off with "I've seen ProviderXXX several times before..." I will automatically ignore that review, good or bad. It won't matter whether the review continues with "this time the session was a total disaster" or "this time she especially rocked my world."
The first was more romantic.
The second was more straight forward.
I told the dude "Dude. Just write it. Don't send it to me first."
"But Courtney, I want to make sure you are OK with it, and you won't retaliate. I am inflating your review a lot, especially the performance scores." (Since when have I ever retaliated about a review? What an accusation, just to get under my skin.)
"Why? Just write and score how you think."
"No. Your performance has gone down these last couple of times, but I feel I need to inflate them."
And then I fired the client for being a little sad, manipulative bitch. Literally begging me to manipulate my review from him.
The reason my performance had fallen, was because I wasn't increasing in the "in love" area. My problem back then was that I was choosing the wrong guys. He was a classic example of a guy who holds reviews over your head - only he did it backwards. "I know you hate fake scores, so I am going to give you fake scores."
It was fucking weird. Thank god that is over. *puke*
-- Modified on 4/27/2016 10:39:13 PM
Sorry, but I've got nothing, I think calling him a "little sad, manipulative bitch" is being too fucking nice to him.
I have always maintained that us assholes make the best clients. we rarely fall in love, are never whiny, and stalking is WAY too much work for us. It's the BSUs that will make your life a living hell.
Ok, can we talk about our "feelings" now? I am trying to get in touch with my sensitive side. lol
First, stop trying to act as if you do not have a sensitive side. Although you do a good job trying to hide it, it still sneaks out in your posts from time to time. That is the primary reason I have been spoiling your fun and have not been so combative with you lately.
Second, you are right, what the hell is wrong with that guy? I DO care about a provider's feelings when she is respectful and we have an amazing session together, but this guy is an absolute flake. There is a very distinct difference between being a gentleman and being a sycophant. This guy borders on being the latter.
If a woman knows what she's going into, and is intentional about it. I'm sure she'd make a killing with those guys. In fact, I could write up an entire business plan on how to attract these guys. Some people can handle that shit. I looked back and realized why most of my guys were like that.
I could have milked a few of those guys and strung them along, but I didn't. They actually got mad. I would actually offer this guy his "grandfathered rates" AND OTC dinner as I was adjusting/playing with my rates. (I don't do that anymore, and haven't for a LONG time.)
I had just moved to Chicago.
So this guy called me a scammer because I grandfathered him and gave him OTC - saying I wanted to milk more dates out of him. Like - jesus, just take a fucking gift. LOL.
I think some dudes have fetishes and if they were just honest about it, they would have a great time.
-- Modified on 4/28/2016 10:16:54 AM
From now on I am going to call out every hooker who "manipulates" me into a return session by totally fucking my brains out on the first visit. I had no idea I was being manipulated this way, Thank you for opening my eyes for me. lol
an extremely complimentary review, with an appropriate number of adjectives to describe a perfectly enjoyable session.
It's whore monger TYVM, or if you prefer (and I do) Whore Mongering Pig.
by any other name GA..........will still smell as sweet.
but certainly called for.
So you're saying your performance did slip?
I'll try to remember to not fall "in love" with
you. I'll stick with great sex ....
Nowadays I don't mind getting more passionate and fun, making it more exciting and I love talking about feelings. (I am the biggest sap in the world, and very affectionate / sentimental / romantic lol)
But as you would probably tell, there was a reason I wasn't getting all emo with this guy. He was blasting signs of sewage from the beginning.
P.S. I shortened this, because I went on a rant that didn't make any sense. LOL
-- Modified on 4/28/2016 10:46:09 AM
But Sasha knows I can be a little over explanatory and get on a roll when I talk about people who are out of line lmfao
was nasty. I said it was deserved. I thought you'd get a chuckle out of it. I find you directness refreshing like a few other ladies here. Nooner and Julia's Little Secret come to mind. Sassay I like ...
Rick on doll
But I just wanted to make sure everybody knows Sasha is awesome
When a provider gives a bad session it can be because of some client problem( attitude, teeth, smell or shy penis problem. Lol. The client doesn't enjoy. The review blames it on the provider. A provider can have a bad day and not feel well too. Multiple bad reviews and the provider is usually in question. Just my take on the way the system works. Go by the reviews and you will rarely have a bad session. All the ladies are special.