hmmm... interesting. The anal field is for if the provider allows anal, not gives it. I have updated the profiles.
-- Staff
I just noticed 2 reviews (by the same person) that were funny to me because they listed the following...
Sex: No
Anal: Yes
I would think this would be, well, oxymoronic. By Anal, he meant that these girls did him with a strap-on.
Nothing wrong with that, but I think it falls under a different category...
I've sent Staff a note with a link to your message.
hmmm... interesting. The anal field is for if the provider allows anal, not gives it. I have updated the profiles.
-- Staff
... the profiles that say:
BJ: "No" or "Yes with condom"
CIM: "Yes, Swallows"
How about this I recently saw for a Pre-Op TS:
Lick Pussy: Yes
?????
I guess we can't solve this, but really
"to completion" in text of a review should
mean same thing as CIM. Short of that it's
just a bbbj with a hand job at the end.
Having a CIM box in the profile helps, but
then some members get careless or imprecise
in the narrative.
But no accounting for opinions. One respected
friend of mine says completion "don't mean
nuthin'" to him unless she swallows.