I like my women just a little on the trashy side. I am not into nun-want-to-bes.

Sometimes I'm in the mood for a trashy girl.

Sometimes I'm in the mood for Girl Next Door.

There's room for all types in this hobby.

But if I was advising a girl, I would tell her not to do it, unless portraying herself as a slut was her niche.

(Well, maybe I can. 8o)

but there is a way to reveal the vagina in a way that is very sophisticated and artistic.  This is true of just about any kind of photography.

Now and then, a bit of trash is just what the doctor ordered

a woman with her legs spread apart holding her labia lips wide open is a bit off putting for me.

a tasteful shot from the rear of the lady coyly pulling aside her panties to reveal the goods is quite enticing.

either way i would love to see yours in person roxanne, but you already know that!

also, you have already read my opinion of your pictures... i love the retro-look you bring to them, and find your pictures very appealing.

...It's about presentation. Spread legs vagina pics with the lady using her fingers to spread the lips is a bit much sometimes. (Sometimes I like it) However I like a previous poster (think it was Jack) would advise a provider not to post photos like that on her site. Though if she wants to appeal to a particular clientele there are all kinds out there. I understand why TER decided not to allow those kinds of shots on the Photo Board but I miss the photos where the vagina is visible as a normal result of the pose. I don't see any issues with the view from the back when the lady is in doggie position and her legs are together so it's not a spread shot. In this pose she isn't using her fingers to spread her cheeks etc. either.  

I say vagina photos aren't automatically trashy it depends on the actual pose.

As I call it.

The vertical smile.  Nothing sexier to me. Legs closed. Oh mama...

... more often than not some of ones with the most unappealing looking vags are the quickest to show it off

I enjoy teasing pics as much as vagina pics. I don't find anything trashy about seeing a well groomed vagina. If it's dirty or the picture was taken near a dumpster then that is a whole different matter...

Some providers take these pictures as a form of artwork that happens to be useful for advertising, but other providers are just trying to garner business. Both types of pictures are going to attract clients and I don't necessarily feel that the "trashy"pics will attract "lower tier" clients.

Personally, I would prefer more pictures that give me a better idea of how the provider's face looks. I completely understand that face concealment and blurring are due to privacy reasons, but it doesn't change the fact that a face that I find pretty or beautiful is one of the most important factors for me as a client.

...but they wouldn't stop me either. I much prefer a woman dressed in something that accentuates her beauty and gives me an idea of her personality. For me, I enjoy the whole dance... A little wine, some soft music, and a slow mutual unwrapping.

For escort advertising purposes, the medical illustration shots are trashy.
For med book advertising purposes, the medical illustration shots are right on target.

There are V-shots and there are actual gyno-shots.  In some super close-up gyno-shots, you don't even know what you're looking at. You think you're looking at a satellite image of some weird place. Then you zoom out and see that you've been looking into her deep valley.  

For escort ads, I have seen quite a few vagina presentations that were not trashy at all. I'm thinking of quite a few that were fully naked but the main focus was not on the V but on her face or other element. I can think of a few that show the lady romping on the beach or in the room and she just seems so natural and playful and beautiful ... and the naked V is just a natural part of that.  

Here's a link to some plants pretending to be vaginas

Every time I see "the pink", I think it must be for guys who are into self-service rather than P4P. I see a lot of this on Webcam sites like  Chaturbait. Com where thousands of guys log in to watch coeds rub one out. Personally, I never liked the bent over, "look at my butt hole" shot. It just seems trashy to me.

different angles & poses, dress & undress...  so, in total, I know what she looks like naked before she arrives at my door.  I don't need to be her OBGYN.

All in the interest of sexual science.

I googled beautiful vaginas. Images.  To my eye, there are some that aren't what I consider beautiful. The ones that are spread apart seem more trashy or what a professional gynecologist might photograph. The ones I thought were more tasteful (if you pardon the term ;}) were "at rest". My ATF has such a vagina but I don't have any photos to prove my point.

Just a picture of a cooter in a pose is beauty.  That G spot stimulation rub on film was beauty.    I have seen women stick bull cans in, stretch them like they can handle a wine bottle, ping pong balls and spit them out, guys glasses disappear, pick up money off the floor,  men cumming on their faces.    The old country fairs did it all.     This is not beauty to me but perverted.  Just my opinion .     I believe every woman wants respect even though she will often do things a little out of her comfort zone for money.

While a mystery can be exotic, most of us guys are here for, and will pay top dollar for one thing.......Pussy. So why not include a pussy or two with the exotic Playboy look? They're both exciting. Personally, there's one type of pussy that turns me the hell on. If you show me your pussy, and it's my type, then I'm in (well, good reviews too). If you don't show me, then you have to do something else to spark my interest. If you do that something else, and you aren't my pussy type, that's okay. All pussy is wonderful! It's just that my type ups the ante.

I enjoy a nice pussy shot- up close or from a distance. Not a big fan of spread open pussy..... I'd rather do that spreading myself

What we should be talking about is the vulva not the vagina. all the goody parts are the vulva.

a woman has speculum in and you can actually see INSIDE you are not viewing her vagina, but her vulva.  

This hooker will not go to that length.

Although I prefer to see full nudity in a prospective provider's profile, the full-fledged opening photos are a bit much.

I need glasses. Had to read this for days before I  noticed you were not mad at the newest board having pictures. Just the headline. I don't live in Virginia.

-- Modified on 2/2/2016 11:59:11 AM

I want the photos to give me a good idea of what she looks like in person.  If that includes vag pics, then fine.

I highly doubt many hookers will have this on their websites, but for those who want a vagina pic, copy this and wank to your hearts content.

-- Modified on 2/2/2016 11:01:41 AM