Went back and got a girl who was FOB from SARSlandia, very disappointing. It's hit and miss with these places.
I decided to take a look around at some of the new reviews ( took me all of 5 minutes to track this one ) and was a little surprised (not really) at the results of this new? AMP.
Take a look at this, all these girls work for the same place http://theeroticreview.com/reviews/Reviewer.asp?MemberID=221499&Membername=hellokittypussy
Then, tracking through some of the other reviewrs, I found that many only see girls from Julies or the new? amp.
Perhaps whitelightning was really on to something? Perhaps Julies and this new? amp advertise more to the type of person that is just finding TER and both agencies at the same time? Perhaps all these new reviews are purely coincidence?
I don't have the answers, but we may want to consider taking our time and looking at all sides of a story prior to jumping down someones throat in the future. And just because someone doesn't post reviews, (Seventhson didn't post reviews) or posts under an alias (A Spectator) doesn't mean they aren't credible. I am using these 2 as examples because we all know and love these 2.
What I have noticed, is that some people endear themselves very quickly to the group as a whole because of their articulation (something that makes a good politician and politicians are not to be trusted). Others may be more abrupt in the manner that they come across and not garner an immediate sense of comraderie. And this is when we get the mob mentality that we all fall into on ocassion.
Okay, my ADD has kicked in and I must end whatever it is that I am rambling on about.
-- Modified on 7/13/2003 7:02:56 AM
I can't speak for the AMP you discussed, but Julie's? I don't think so. There are so many great reviews for her gals (many of them my own!). She has no need to do such a thing. But please, we went through that a few threads back. Let's not stir up that pot again. She has lots of reviews posted simply because she's a high volume place. Period.
I have to agree, many are all new reviews for the amp. No one fails to mention that those are not the girls that they are seeing. In my previous post. One agency was using another Asian girl on their website and using the pictures belonging to Cookie, Maya...Hey, Cookie... are probably beautiful girls, but it is not what the pictures potray. Just remember this, with amp, all the girls have a ton of makeup, in a dimly lit room , all are gorgeous. All the recent new reviews come in as 8, 9's. Personally, I believe the reviews are questionable. With AMP businesses, they make their money during the summer. Why not put reviews with 8's and 9's to get you to come in. I believe you will have a decent time, but the pictures of the girls are not the same ones that will be giving you a bbbj.
Well, I for one researched TER before coming to NY and found that the most reviewed incall agency was Julies. Even reading about the controversy, there just seemed to be too many reviews for them all to be bogus. I gave it a shot and it worked for me. As for the "AMP", I like Asian ladies and gave the one I mentioned a shot. Worked for me too.
(Notice that there may be a price point that is similiar, I can't afford many encounters at higher prices)
If you will notice I have some, not many, reviews posted. Mostly old. Actually I submitted a number of others but since I was not "graphic" enough for TER they were not added to the database. I didn't bother submitting them with more details to get them admitted because in the case of the ladies I had reveiwed less graphically I did not want to be too specific. In the most part I have been more active on TBD
You guys probably have reasons to be overly cautious with new posters on this board, but if every thing written is suspect unless it comes from a "known to this board" poster then you become a "club" which becomes sort of incestuous don't you think? Ok, I am not trying to stir up a hornet's nest, just an observation. PS. I am not a "politician" although you can choose to trust me or not. Your call.
Chuck
I wasn't implying that all of Julies reviews were bogus. It just seems odd how the same reviewers of this new AMP are new reviewers and some also have 1 or 2 reviews of a Julies girl. It is a pattern that I noticed just taking a quick glance.
Jaejae, I agree, these undoubtedly bogus reviews for East of Paradise seem to stand out like a sore thumb. In addition to "hellokittypussy," you can add "RiverDanceFan" and (probably) "SlickWillyNYC." What's really interesting is that some of these bogus reviews seemed to have disappeared as well. One handle I seem to remember (for the same girls - Mimi, Amy, etc.) was "handjob6963" (or something like that). There were others as well. I haven't gone there and I don't intend to, but it's probably going to be a case of YMMV.
i can no longer read a review because i just went back to basic member. what's the url of the AMP?
reminder,,,, most amp sites use phony pics.
i know this place, but like all AMP's, it's hit or miss, they move a lot(LE),and they tend to treat return customers better, A LOT better, which is why i never review them.
place is very nice and clean, on the west side midtown. i can recommend a gal i've seen a few times before who's very bubbly and pretty cute. i knew her before her tit job,,,now they're humungous. can't remember her name, but like i said, she has a very bubbly personality always smiling, huge tits, about 5'2"-5'3", lightened hair, naturally darker skin(not fair-skinned). bundle of energy.
avoid hikari (212)644-9734 on east 50th. hikari went back to japan. the others are curt, especially the mature gal who picks up the phone.
Went back and got a girl who was FOB from SARSlandia, very disappointing. It's hit and miss with these places.
It's hard to find which review is yours since you post with an alias. I know you've said that you've been to many amp's but point us to your reviews.