I guess I will have to be more thorough. Yes, the coward only has to say he "misspoke" and admin will remove his post which also removes all subsequent posts in the thread that flow from his. My intent was to say that it is pretty easy to do, but you are correct, TER has the final say, but is very lenient on removing things people have said that they want to erase.
I get a lot of chuckles from reading Craigslist Casual Encounters ads. If none of you guys has ever met a Chula Vista police officer, showing up at this "provider's" location might be a good way of meeting one:
bbw latina visiting chulavista - w4m (E st chulavista)
Bbw visiting chulavista
Im located at days inn chulavista on E st off i5.
Call now to ask for rates.
20nine two 35 seven 1 seven 2
209 is a Stockton area code. Searching on the phone # reveals no online presence.
With the rainy weather I would have thought that a lot of cops are busy visiting traffic accidents. Maybe some have kept dry and warm inside and are now feeling full from eating donuts
For example: she checks into her hotel and posts a photo on her instagram WITH THE HOTEL NAME AND LOCATION listed in the photo description while at the pool there or wherever. And this person is a "top rated" provider locally here. So CL isn't the only place people exercise poor judgement. Be sure to see who is discrete and who is not when that may be a concern for you. This takes time and energy but if discretion is important I suggest looking at your desired dates social media prior to booking to see if this person is conscientious of privacy.
bbw latina visiting chulavista - w4m (E st chulavista)
Bbw visiting chulavista
Im located at days inn chulavista on E st off i5.
Call now to ask for rates.
20nine two 35 seven 1 seven 2
209 is a Stockton area code. Searching on the phone # reveals no online presence.
With the rainy weather I would have thought that a lot of cops are busy visiting traffic accidents. Maybe some have kept dry and warm inside and are now feeling full from eating donuts.
never see a provider working at a temporary hotel incall. Either they come to my hotel room on an outcall, or else I will go to their residential incall. Safety first.
-- Modified on 4/9/2016 12:46:53 AM
You raise a great point about checking her social media.
Question: how do I figure out her social media handles?
believe the shit I got a few months ago when I made an identical non-PC joke about a big provider and a donut shop. Glad this board has mellowed a bit and the members here now have a sense of humor. If the haters come out again, I got your back. Lol
I have also noticed something over the years that when traveling on interstates. It seems that as long as I am a minimum distance of 20 miles from the nearest donut shop, the odds of coming across a cop with a speed trap are much less.
This actually does seem to work. It seems to be safer to speed as long as you are at least 20 miles minimum from the nearest donut shop! Now one could argue that there are other reasons cops want to stay closer to towns, such as for access to restrooms, etc. That might be true, but I have come across very small towns without donut shops and it seems safer to speed by them.
In fact, I have only gotten one speeding ticket in my life on an interstate by using this rule. It was on an interstate in another state. I had just gotten a few miles within that 20 mile range of a donut shop. I was traveling right about the speed limit. I went over a small hill and was then going down hill for a minute. This caused my speed to briefly go to 5 mph over the speed limit. Sure enough there was a cop with his speed trap. He actually stopped me for being 5 miles over the speed limit. I accidentally broke my own rule and briefly was speeding within 20 miles of a donut shop.
Never underestimate cops love for donuts!
-- Modified on 4/9/2016 10:57:13 AM
selective amnesia. The girl in the ad that I was mocking never appeared on the board, it was a DIFFERENT large provider, and a bunch of kiss-ass hobbyists that came out with the hate. When my reasoned argument started to make a few of them look stupid, some coward, not TER, decided to take down the thread. Even though thread was removed, I still have the posts on my own list of posts, so you are dead wrong.
...coward can only report a thread. Then it is up to TER to DECIDE to take down the thread.
If you're misleading everyone with your post, maybe YOU are the one with selective amnesia and Goldie is right about what happened previously. Just sayin'
-- Modified on 4/9/2016 4:21:57 PM
I posted a thread once I later determined to be ill advised. I contacted TER and asked it be removed. Despite several reads and one reply the thread was removed. So, it is possible.
...and TER acceded to his desire to remove it. c-d-l said it was other posters who decided to remove his thread and somehow forced TER to remove it (or hacked TER and removed it themselves).
Get your own post removed, and all responses to that post are automatically removed as well, so if a "coward" gets in over his head and looks stupid, he need only ask to remove his own post, and the response he doesn't like is removed as well because it was "downstream" from his own post. So technically, another member CAN remove my post indirectly by removing his own on request. I don't like it, but that's the way it is. I have no problem with someone having second thoughts about a post they put up. I had one of my own removed in January at my request when I put up some inside information on the Seattle bust, and then had second thoughts a few minutes later. However, I did it fast enough that no one else's post below mine was removed at the same time. My objection is when a coward is losing an argument or clings to an untenable position, so removes his own post and all responses so he doesn't look stupid. We all look stupid sometimes. Its no big deal. Most of us will recover.
I agree. But, I think it's mostly in the timing. If a poster waits to long before asking it be removed, I don't think TER will go along with it. In my case, I made the request within about an hour. So, if an asshole coward is losing a debate/argument and wants it removed, something tells me it won't work. As least I hope not.
It happens all the time on the LA board. Sometimes a dozen posts get removed that are south of the one the coward wants removed of his own. Its just the way it works, and it actually makes a little sense if you argue that once a comment is removed, all of the comments that reflect back to that one become irrelevant.
I guess I will have to be more thorough. Yes, the coward only has to say he "misspoke" and admin will remove his post which also removes all subsequent posts in the thread that flow from his. My intent was to say that it is pretty easy to do, but you are correct, TER has the final say, but is very lenient on removing things people have said that they want to erase.
Thank you for contributing to this post.