When it comes to fake reviews my all time favorite is a current provider in Vegas. At this time she has at least 50 all 10/10 reviews. Not a single 9/10 was able to sneak in yet! lol The funny thing is I actually met this girl about a year ago at a LV M&G. She is cute, but just average height and build. At best 8 in looks. Got to give her "manager" alot of credit as new 10/10's appear like clockwork every week.
Preface: About 10 years ago there was a provider in Palm Springs who had a string of reviews with scores of 10/10. After she had around three reviews I started reading them. Based on the words used in the reviews I concluded that it was highly likely each had been written by a female. After she got to about the fifth 10/10 review, I wrote TER. I wrote again after the seventh or eight 10/10 review. Finally, after she had 10 reviews each with 10/10 scores TER took down her profile. Although 10 years have passed since this happened, it is my recollection that most if not all of the reviewers had reviewed only the provider "in question".
Now, back to our regular programming.
I will not give any links here. If you want to play, you will have to do your own detective work as I have.
Here is some of what I noticed that raised my suspicions:
1) A very recent ad here from a provider with a name that is not familiar. Click on "see my TER reviews" and she has only one review, with an almost "perfect" score, listing a higher-than-average donation rate.
2) Check reviewer whose name is not familiar. He has three reviews, starting in February, all of which have high to "perfect" scores. Check to see if he has ever posted: San Diego Board-no; General Board-no; Newbie Board-no; Orange County-no; Los Angeles-no.
3) I read the one review of the gal who posted the recent ad. Well-written, but raises suspicions. I'll list only two:
A) Reviewer gives no indication of having seen her or her online ads before he booked, but comments that she has "new pictures" on her site.
B) Reviewer says that she has "done miracles" with her apartment, suggesting that he knew what it looked like before. Since this is apparently the first time he saw her, how would he know what it looked like before she performed the miracles?
4) Look at first provider "he" reviewed. It is the provider's only review. She was given high scores and her donation rate is at the high end of what the average range seems to be locally. The review profile says she swallows, however, the reviewer does not say she did nor does he specify she told him that is on her menu. The review is well-written, but sounds like a PR piece, using some words that seem to be more often used by females than males.
5) The other provider "he" reviewed: his was the second of her three reviews. Also reads like a PR piece. Her first reviewer has a lot of reviews, but his reviews also sound like PR pieces. And, he has a lot of reviews from the state where the provider who placed the ad was located before she moved here.
FYI: It took me more than two hours to conduct this research.
A Thought: now that the "colored" book site is defunct, I wonder if some of the "managers" who were active there have moved here.
Game on.....if you have the time
not going to play today but i have seen #4 on your list more times than i care to count.
if a new girl has only a couple 10/10's and i check the reviewers' other reviews, only to find they don't have any, then it's fake for sure.
or worse, a couple of reviewers ONLY review 2 or 3 new girls who ONLY HAVE REVIEWS from those 2 reviewers.
fake fake fake
When it comes to fake reviews my all time favorite is a current provider in Vegas. At this time she has at least 50 all 10/10 reviews. Not a single 9/10 was able to sneak in yet! lol The funny thing is I actually met this girl about a year ago at a LV M&G. She is cute, but just average height and build. At best 8 in looks. Got to give her "manager" alot of credit as new 10/10's appear like clockwork every week.
going to play, then I'm out, too.
However, I will say that I have never given a 10/10. For me, it seems that the girls that are genuinely 10 in looks know it, and so they don't work as hard at the service. For this reason, I think many hot-looking girls get 10's for service because the reviewer allows her looks to influence her performance score. Likewise, I think "looks" scores are often raised by some reviewers based on a knock-your-socks-off performance. Since its all subjective, in the eye of the reviewer, I don't think it will ever change. With that said, yes, there are also outright fakes. Fakes are usually revealed in the details. I recently read one for one of my regulars (once a week visits) where the reviewer said he sat on the "couch" and talked with her for awhile. Well, there is no couch in the incall. Then he said he got on the massage table. There is no massage table, its an AAMP with a regular bed. Reviewer is a moron for getting caught so easily.
model so she was written off as fraud. In my domino world, anybody that reviews KB is likely to post reviews for other frauds. Too bad about Ashli A. and Natalie H.
Obviously the ultimate goal with all of this is to get into the top 100. Which brings a lot of extra business and allows to jack up rates. So it looks like some quick thinking entrepreneurs (both male and female) managed to incorporate Ter into an integral part of their business model.
Look familiar? Striking resemblance, agreed?
fake pics? yes, but they blur their faces like the majority of providers so what we're all window shopping for is based on a fantasy body type.
fake reviews? maybe/some, but as the Op indicated, at least one reviewer had a significant review history. In addition, although all "scores" were very good, they were not all 10s. You can read anything you want into the discrepancies between the text and provider profiles.
Last but not least, Natalie H was advertised as a doubles partner for a well reviewed provider, giving her significant credibility in my book.
bottom line: provider faux pas for using fake pics, review histories are too weak for any other judgement.
-- Modified on 4/8/2016 11:44:57 PM