TER General Board

No.
rrasha88 See my TER Reviews 395 reads
posted

The mantra for legitimizing p4p is that it is an activity knowingly agreed to by consenting adults.  Mutual consent is a bright line that should not be crossed.

tnyhs1493 reads

If a guy wanted to have you meet him and his significant other at a bar where they were going for drinks.... with the intention that you would strike up a conversation with them and try to "pick them up" to go back to their place for some fun...  

Knowing she was curious, but never had a 3....  If he offered to pay double your rate for your time at their place (assuming you could close the deal), would you take the challenge?

I'm sure a lot of ladies have received this proposal. I can think of two ladies in particular - one let me know that her next appointment was this exact scenario (but I never followed up with her to see how it went); the other said that it was really awkward with the wife not being totally on board, really it was all about fulfilling the husband's fantasy.  

I suggest that you be straight up with your SO instead of trying to trick her into a threesome.

No, I would not do that with out her knowing the whole deal up front. Tricking her to a threesome can only cause problems for you and me.

Seriously though, what is this "double the rate, assuming she closed the deal?" Bwahaha! :D
Providers who see couples have a higher rate for couples. Sometimes it's double her regular rate, sometimes not quite, but it's double the work, for her. Also, in this case you are asking for role play and fantasy on top of that, so expect to pay a lot more than her regular rate. Whether the deal "closes" or not, expect to pay her, and  pay upfront. You will also need to be screened.  

You can find almost anything you want in this hobby so your scenario is not out of the question, but it is not as simple as you make it sound.


-- Modified on 10/9/2015 12:33:06 PM

Couples are a blast, but they're only a blast when both parties are privy to the exchange.  It's all kinds of unethical to try and dupe your partner into having sex with someone that she might not want to have sex with in the first place.  Informed, enthusiastic consent is a requirement for everyone involved, and if it's not present, the scene could be a disaster.  

Requests like this are rarely serious; if it were a role-play scenario and your girlfriend was into it, you'd probably be asked for a deposit and payment up front before the date began. The quote you'd get would be based on the entire time that you and your girlfriend spent with the provider in question; not just the time back at your place (believe me, trying to pick someone up who isn't interested in you is way more exhausting than sex).  Both of you would have to be screened as well.  In an enthusiastic role-play scenario in which your girlfriend were into the idea, the resulting three-way would be guaranteed, so the "payable upon completion" idea is out the window.  

Ultimately, the whole idea and request is super coercive and manipulative.

The mantra for legitimizing p4p is that it is an activity knowingly agreed to by consenting adults.  Mutual consent is a bright line that should not be crossed.

I've done it twice, but both times I had a session with him alone first. I knew I'd get paid a one hour minimum even if it didn't happen, but both times, it did! I went to the bathroom with her and kissed her before we exited. . I love being a woman's "first".

It's best that everyone involved knows the deal. I can imagine more times than not this is more about fulfilling the husband's fantasy more than it is about the wife being that curious.

Don't get me wrong I'm sure many women are curious and would love that kind of activity, but everyone would be more at ease knowing what they are getting into, no?

though you can certainly agree to role play.  I've never tried it myself but every time the topic comes up, the provider must advance screen both of the couple AND generally needs to speak to the wife.  

The alturnative...  the couple shows up, the wife says NO (actually more likely "Are you F-ing Crazy") and storms off, followed by the husband who needs to save his marriage...   So the provider is now alone, unpaid, and at risk (woman scored) of being outted or worse public enemy #1.

I wouldn't even answer the first email, and if I did, it would be to arrange a phone call with his wife before any more bullshit went underway.

That sounds like a good bit of fun, on top of the ample compensation.

No, I don't offer games like that.  I'm more straight forward. It's not within my personality.

So if the wife/GF doesn't end up putting out, I don't get paid? As tempting as it sounds to waste what could easily amount to thousands of dollars worth of time for free, I think I'd have to pass.  

For the record, though, I've been approached with this offer on multiple occasions. Not once has it panned out into anything other than a waste of bandwidth.  

Posted By: tnyhs
If a guy wanted to have you meet him and his significant other at a bar where they were going for drinks.... with the intention that you would strike up a conversation with them and try to "pick them up" to go back to their place for some fun...  
   
 Knowing she was curious, but never had a 3....  If he offered to pay double your rate for your time at their place (assuming you could close the deal), would you take the challenge?

Register Now!