and IMO every provider that looks hot with a lot of ink, would probably have looked even better without it.  

Ink is not a deal breaker for me, unless they look like jail house tats, but tats make me less likely to book a woman, not more likely. IOW if she is right on the edge of being hot enough for me to book with her, the difference of a lot vs a few tats could be the difference maker to me.

...boob tattoos. Total turn off for me. Face tattoos are also beyond stupid.

One of my ATF's had a huge tatoo that covered her back. I didn't mind it at all because it's not what I was playing attention to.  

An ankle bracelet can be nice. Even a tramp stamp if it is symmetrical. Boob ink is a definite no go for me. And I don't want to see another guy's name.

Tattoos?  Yes, please.  Tattoos and body piercings?  Kiss me.  Tattoos, body piercings and dyed hair?  Fuck my brains out, baby.  Tattoos, body piercings, dyed hair and dark skin?  Marry me.  OK, OK, I know I'm getting carried away here...

Tattoos on a hot girl can make her look hotter.  However tattoos on an ugly girl and she's still an ugly girl.

..at least one youthful indiscretion. I have a small bird on a shoulder that I got when I was 20. If it were up to me, I'd probably have more, but I'm aware that I don't have a 9-5 where it's cool as long as clothing covers them. Most people I 'work' with see me naked. LOL

I find that well done 'suicide girls' type tattoos are attractive to me and accent a beautiful body wonderfully. a bunch of Betty Boop, Winnie the Pooh, lover's names, a list of kids or in memoriam tattoos? Not my thing. It's permanent art and should be treated as such, IMO. But what I think about someone's tattoos doesn't matter, it's not my body and not my business, literally. I think tasteful tattoos and the women who wear them do just fine. It's just another preference. I'm a redhead, some people prefer blondes or brunettes

... If I find the lady otherwise interesting and attractive, then it is not a factor to me at all.  This is different the how I felt when I was starting out, as I was not a fan of ink.  Some of my best times have been with heavily inked ladies, so I am happy that I ignored that bias.

I like colorful full sleeves and extensive tats that run from the nape of the neck all the way down to her cute little tush. I know that I am probably in the small minority on this one, but I really like the alt girl look.

one of my fantasies, unfortunately most of the women in my age appropriate group are not tatted..

I prefer no ink or a small amount (e.g., a butterfly on the shoulder blade).

While I might admire the artistry of well-done and extensive tattoos, they are something of a turnoff for me for someone to go to bed with. Many women have such lovely natural skin color and texture, and it seems a shame to mar it. For a woman in this group, I would prefer to admire and caress her skin in its natural state.

However, I am on the older side, and women with extensive tattoos were generally signalling that they were less-than-classy when I was younger in the 1980s. Things have changed, but like my mild preference for pubic hair, I have some preference for natural skin and no metal or piercings (apart from earlobes or a cute belly-button ornament).

-- Modified on 7/31/2015 1:11:38 PM

if she's hot in other ways I'll overlook it.  I have a couple myself.

...more and more to the alt look.  I find a lot of the Suicide Girls/Burning Angels/et al to be incredibly hot.  But as said above by others, these are usually gals that I would also find attractive were they not inked at all.  The tats give these otherwise hot women an edge that I like.

I love it!

There is nothing sexier (to me) than a beautiful girl (e.g. Tobi or Amsterdam) with ink. I think it's F'ing hot!! ... even tho I only have one big tattoo myself.  

Different strokes ...

But there is some point at which I feel it's too much... Ok, an arm sleeve or leg sleeve is OK, but not every square inch..

But not a deal breaker. So many providers have tattoos, that if it was a dealbreaker, I would probably have to be celibate.  Anyway for me, a few tattoos are ok, but a full sleeve, or tattoos on thighs, and boobs are a turn off to me.

I do not like tats, but one or two small ones I'll overlook.  It has been a deal breaker in the past when the girl has too much ink.

There are some extraordinary and beautiful works of art out there.  The ladies must have spent a lot of dough on those efforts and many hours sitting getting jabbed.  Amsterdam TER ID: 129682 is a good example.  She is a tattoo model.  Angel in Boston has wings on her back and sleeves that look incredible in her photos (haven't met her in person).  

But then there are girls who look they got their tattoos in prison using a paper clip and ink made from coffee grounds or cigarette ashes.  Blech.  Possibly things they did in JHS or HS to hang with the cool kids or something.  But it's not art, it's scrawl, a blemish.  I know a K-girl in NYC who is one of the most beautiful K-girls I know but her tattoos degrade, rather than enhance, her beauty.

-- Modified on 7/31/2015 12:58:50 PM

small discreet tats are fine. I don't care for ones that are large as in sleeves or across the back.

...especially with upscale clientele. For me I prefer that a provider not have them. You can't improve upon the beauty of a woman by scribbling nonsense in ink on her. If I see a provider who has one she has to be exceptionally pretty or I will pass. Not trying to insult anyone, just being honest.

I prefer a clean clanvas for my art!

I do just fine.
While it may be a deal breaker for some, it's a deal maker for others and it's a no big deal for most.
xo

the only thing that is acceptable to me are small, discreetly placed tatts or the occasional tramp stamp.  no way I would see a provider that had large visible tattoos.