I like it!!!
One attribute i'd like is "puffy" aereolae. That's another of my fetishes, although it's pretty rare.
A post by Scribe1 over on the Phoenix-area board got me thinking. While the TER database is fairly extensive in listing provider's physical attributes, there is one area that I'm sure many of us would like to see better addressed, specifically, additional catagories to describe the ladies' nipples and areola. The "Breast Appearance" catagory can sometimes provide a clue, but it really does not supply sufficient information to those who, for one example, might be looking specifically for an escort with long nipples and large, dark areola.
Of course I realize that the ladies are more than just a sum of their body parts, but sometimes we clients just have a particular need (some might say, fetish) that only those with a particular physical characteristic can satisfy. That is obviously one reason why there are already so many appearance-related traits classified within these profiles.
Therefore, I propose to TER that three additional catagories be added to the "Provider's Appearance" section of the escort profiles. First, a separate "Nipple Appearance" catagory with options that might include the following: Inverted, Flat, Average Sized, Longer/Larger than Average (Perky), and Very Long and/or Large. Since some guys might (and do) confuse areola and nipple attributes, separate "Areola Size" and "Areola/Nipple Shading" (skin-tone contrast) catagories should also be added. Possible options for "Size" could include: Tiny, Small, Average, Large, and Huge; and for the "Shading" catagory: Pale (little to no contrast), Light (some contrast), Average (medium contrast), Dark (more than average contrast), and Very Dark (high degree of contrast).
I feel these additional catagories would significantly enhance the database, allowing those with preferences in any of these areas to more quickly locate potential providers that might better fit their specific needs. What do the rest of y'all think?
Regards,
Speed Racer
as someone who particularly enjoys perky nipples and a small areola, this would be very helpful.
If you are going to devote a whole category to nipples, then what about the guys who are very particular about the kitty? There's tons of possible descriptions for that area.
Then what about the leg man? The butt man? Feet? Hair? These areas are just as important to certain men.
The point is, if you have all these detailed choices on the review forms, it will take a 3 page form to describe all the body parts in detail. Who has the time to do that?
Guys... we have enough problems making sure we have the right boob size, much less the Areola Size or Areola/Nipple Shading! The database is only as good as the data inside of it. Make the forms too detailed and the value goes to hell.
-- Staff
...and "realisticCA" also made a good point about the "ass guys" and the "leg guys" and the "kitty guys" all would then be wanting additional catagories in the profiles as well. And I know how hard a time it's been for the moderators trying to police just the "Porn Star?" catagory (with just 3 possible responses there - yes, no, or don't know). Oh well, it was just a thought!
One other point, it seems that whomever posts the first review of any particular provider gets to dictate how her profile reads. Often those responses in many of the catagories are misleading, if not down right inaccurate. It appears that even when several subsequent reviewers attempt to correct or update such misinformation, it rarely gets reflected in the lady's profile itself. Is this just from the lack of staff at TER able to verify and correct the information? So just what is the best way to get such data updated? Thanks for any clarification you may be able to provide on this issue.
Regards,
Speed Racer
I like it!!!
One attribute i'd like is "puffy" aereolae. That's another of my fetishes, although it's pretty rare.