TER General Board

Isn't it easier to make that connection with a "low volume" hooker?
Bob.Sugar 1052 reads
posted

You know what I mean...some guys need her to look longingly into his eyes...fall into his arms like a long lost lover...gently stroke his hair whispering how great he looks.

I expect many guys need that reassurance.

How can that possibly happen when the gal is running a fast sex repository?

BTW...when was the last time YOU started a thread here?  I expect perfectstorm is already on the case  ;)
Posted By: GaGambler
I keep seeing this over and over again. Women brag about being low volume and men rush to claim they are lying about it, but why do so many guys want a "low volume" hooker in the first place?  
   
 Are you guys secretly hoping that she is saving up all her sexual energy for you? Or do you think that somehow she is going to wear out her pussy by seeing other guys? Or do you think that a woman who fucks more than one guy a day is a 'dirty little whore" and somehow not good enough for you? What is this obsession with "low volume" hookers?  
   
 Some of you guys remind me of the Islamic nut jobs hoping to get those 72 virgins in paradise, who the fuck wants virgins? I want hot, sexy, horny women who want to rock my world. In my experience "low volume" women really don't like to fuck or else they'd be out fucking more. What am  I missing here?  
   
 By all definitions I accept the fact that I am a "high volume" guy. I LIKE to fuck. No, I LOVE to fuck. This is hookerviille not a church social where we are looking for a soul mate who will love us, and no other. Why would I want to waste my time with a hooker who really doesn't like sex?

GaGambler2444 reads

I keep seeing this over and over again. Women brag about being low volume and men rush to claim they are lying about it, but why do so many guys want a "low volume" hooker in the first place?

Are you guys secretly hoping that she is saving up all her sexual energy for you? Or do you think that somehow she is going to wear out her pussy by seeing other guys? Or do you think that a woman who fucks more than one guy a day is a 'dirty little whore" and somehow not good enough for you? What is this obsession with "low volume" hookers?  

Some of you guys remind me of the Islamic nut jobs hoping to get those 72 virgins in paradise, who the fuck wants virgins? I want hot, sexy, horny women who want to rock my world. In my experience "low volume" women really don't like to fuck or else they'd be out fucking more. What am  I missing here?

By all definitions I accept the fact that I am a "high volume" guy. I LIKE to fuck. No, I LOVE to fuck. This is hookerviille not a church social where we are looking for a soul mate who will love us, and no other. Why would I want to waste my time with a hooker who really doesn't like sex?

Bob.Sugar1053 reads

You know what I mean...some guys need her to look longingly into his eyes...fall into his arms like a long lost lover...gently stroke his hair whispering how great he looks.

I expect many guys need that reassurance.

How can that possibly happen when the gal is running a fast sex repository?

BTW...when was the last time YOU started a thread here?  I expect perfectstorm is already on the case  ;)

Posted By: GaGambler
I keep seeing this over and over again. Women brag about being low volume and men rush to claim they are lying about it, but why do so many guys want a "low volume" hooker in the first place?  
   
 Are you guys secretly hoping that she is saving up all her sexual energy for you? Or do you think that somehow she is going to wear out her pussy by seeing other guys? Or do you think that a woman who fucks more than one guy a day is a 'dirty little whore" and somehow not good enough for you? What is this obsession with "low volume" hookers?  
   
 Some of you guys remind me of the Islamic nut jobs hoping to get those 72 virgins in paradise, who the fuck wants virgins? I want hot, sexy, horny women who want to rock my world. In my experience "low volume" women really don't like to fuck or else they'd be out fucking more. What am  I missing here?  
   
 By all definitions I accept the fact that I am a "high volume" guy. I LIKE to fuck. No, I LOVE to fuck. This is hookerviille not a church social where we are looking for a soul mate who will love us, and no other. Why would I want to waste my time with a hooker who really doesn't like sex?

Or in this case, not "threading" as much?

That fkker has like 30,000 posts doesn't he?

Its amazing he can post anything, as I would have thought all ten fingers would have tennis elbow by now. :D :D

And that only counts posts under his handle or that of his smarter brother. It doesn't include any other aliases used or  any posts on the many other boards he posts on, so my guess is that he is well over 30,000 posts. However Mr Sugar's question was about threadstarters. I can't recall the last OP by GaG, and too busy to search right now.

By the way, what's with the word "fkker?" You turning into LR? :D

Posted By: JackDunphy
Or in this case, not "threading" as much?  
   
 That fkker has like 30,000 posts doesn't he?  
   
 Its amazing he can post anything, as I would have thought all ten fingers would have tennis elbow by now. :D :D

GaGambler805 reads

only an average of three a day, but yes this will be my 32,194th post.

I don't remember when the last time I made an OP either, but I know it's way too much work for me to go back and check.

It's a little more work, than a simple search to find the last OP though. :)

GaGambler706 reads

The only way I know of is to go through every post of mine looking to see which ones are OPs. but I bet you I have not had more than a handful of OP's on this board since my moderator days.

Most of the topics are simply rehashes of dick size, I have fallen for a hooker, why won't hookers see black guys? etc etc etc,

That is not a factor I take into account at all.  I am the opposite as I am more a low volume guy.  I live in Hooterville, a couple of hours from the big city, so when I can get away for business I like to make it for a longer visit, and while I have a pretty healthy budget for this, it's not unlimited.  Thus, I like to see a sure thing for more than an hour, but whether they're high volume or low volume is the least of what matters to me.

For me, the absolute best part about the hobby is getting to have sex every. single. day. Well, if I'm lucky :)  I dont know what is really considered low-volume, but in my ideal world I would have two 90-min dates every day, forever.  

Posted By: GaGambler
I keep seeing this over and over again. Women brag about being low volume and men rush to claim they are lying about it, but why do so many guys want a "low volume" hooker in the first place?  
   
 Are you guys secretly hoping that she is saving up all her sexual energy for you? Or do you think that somehow she is going to wear out her pussy by seeing other guys? Or do you think that a woman who fucks more than one guy a day is a 'dirty little whore" and somehow not good enough for you? What is this obsession with "low volume" hookers?  
   
 Some of you guys remind me of the Islamic nut jobs hoping to get those 72 virgins in paradise, who the fuck wants virgins? I want hot, sexy, horny women who want to rock my world. In my experience "low volume" women really don't like to fuck or else they'd be out fucking more. What am  I missing here?  
   
 By all definitions I accept the fact that I am a "high volume" guy. I LIKE to fuck. No, I LOVE to fuck. This is hookerviille not a church social where we are looking for a soul mate who will love us, and no other. Why would I want to waste my time with a hooker who really doesn't like sex?

...and I always assume that when they claim it, its bullshit anyway. But I also assume that the ones that are truly low volume are that way due to a limited amount of time that they have to partake of this hobby.

I prefer not to think of who or how many other mongers she might have seen before me that day. Nothing good can be gained by that kind of thinking.

-- Modified on 7/23/2015 10:04:34 AM

When I say that I'm low volume, it isn't meant to somehow insinuate that I'm a "higher quality" provider or some such BS.  It really just means that I don't do this full-time, so don't be surprised if I'm not available to take your last minute booking, or if my weekend is already full a couple of weeks out

EXACTLY!

- A.

Posted By: THEAvaStClaire
When I say that I'm low volume, it isn't meant to somehow insinuate that I'm a "higher quality" provider or some such BS.  It really just means that I don't do this full-time, so don't be surprised if I'm not available to take your last minute booking, or if my weekend is already full a couple of weeks out.    
   
   
   
 

if it affects her time with me. That aside, I no more care than she does if I just came from seeing another girl. And yep, I sure have!

Posted By: GaGambler

   
 Are you guys secretly hoping that she is saving up all her sexual energy for you? Or do you think that somehow she is going to wear out her pussy by seeing other guys? Or do you think that a woman who fucks more than one guy a day is a 'dirty little whore" and somehow not good enough for you? What is this obsession with "low volume" hookers?  
     
 By all definitions I accept the fact that I am a "high volume" guy. I LIKE to fuck. No, I LOVE to fuck. This is hookerviille not a church social where we are looking for a soul mate who will love us, and no other. Why would I want to waste my time with a hooker who really doesn't like sex?
In the other thread I don't think we were ever able to define a "low volume hooker." I've been BTS before. Most told me that to put on an hourly show they can handle 2 guys a day (spaced out over a few hours)  for 3 days. After that they are like a horse that's been ridden hard and drug in wet. Six guys in three days is not exactly high volume. To listen to other girls talk you would think they do one guy a month.

As long as the girl is not too tired to perform for me what would I care what their volume is? We are not looking for virgins here. I think the low volume crap is a marketing gimmick designed to sucker foolish guys into thinking they are getting a "cleaner" girl. It's no different than girls who charge a grand or more a show but have other ads out for 300. Some even try to make themselves sound more exclusive by making guys jump through unnecessary hoops (personal info) just to see them.

Don't believe the "low volume" hype!!

GaGambler976 reads

and that even goes for hookers I have dated, my best hooker GF's have almost all been what the natives here would call "high volume" and those were the ones that ALWAYS had plenty of gas in the tank for me.

Some of these women act as if their pussy would wear out if they fucked more than a couple of guys a week, and many of the guys eat this shit up as if those hookers are somehow "superior" to the average ho who fucks a couple of guys a day.

I am glad to see that we are finally back on the same page, although it's rather unlikely we will stay there.

STD risk.

Many here think if a gal is "low volume" she carries a lower risk of infection. That's what seems to worry the married guys here so much.

Of course it is illogical, because a low volume girl might be less cautious about STD's and a high volume girl might be VERY cautious...in addition to the obvious that she might be fking many men for free in her civie life.

This is about perception vs. reality, and if a john perceives a gal to be lower volume i.e. lower chance of him catching something, it may put his mind at ease, again, however illogical you and I may know that to be

Just as long as she's not too sore to perform, and yes, I've taken "rain checks". Or is that "fuck checks"?

Posted By: GaGambler
I keep seeing this over and over again. Women brag about being low volume and men rush to claim they are lying about it, but why do so many guys want a "low volume" hooker in the first place?  
   
 Are you guys secretly hoping that she is saving up all her sexual energy for you? Or do you think that somehow she is going to wear out her pussy by seeing other guys? Or do you think that a woman who fucks more than one guy a day is a 'dirty little whore" and somehow not good enough for you? What is this obsession with "low volume" hookers?  
   
 Some of you guys remind me of the Islamic nut jobs hoping to get those 72 virgins in paradise, who the fuck wants virgins? I want hot, sexy, horny women who want to rock my world. In my experience "low volume" women really don't like to fuck or else they'd be out fucking more. What am  I missing here?  
   
 By all definitions I accept the fact that I am a "high volume" guy. I LIKE to fuck. No, I LOVE to fuck. This is hookerviille not a church social where we are looking for a soul mate who will love us, and no other. Why would I want to waste my time with a hooker who really doesn't like sex?

Posted By: GaGambler
I keep seeing this over and over again. Women brag about being low volume and men rush to claim they are lying about it, but why do so many guys want a "low volume" hooker in the first place?  
   
 Are you guys secretly hoping that she is saving up all her sexual energy for you? Or do you think that somehow she is going to wear out her pussy by seeing other guys? Or do you think that a woman who fucks more than one guy a day is a 'dirty little whore" and somehow not good enough for you? What is this obsession with "low volume" hookers?  
   
 Some of you guys remind me of the Islamic nut jobs hoping to get those 72 virgins in paradise, who the fuck wants virgins? I want hot, sexy, horny women who want to rock my world. In my experience "low volume" women really don't like to fuck or else they'd be out fucking more. What am  I missing here?  
   
 By all definitions I accept the fact that I am a "high volume" guy. I LIKE to fuck. No, I LOVE to fuck. This is hookerviille not a church social where we are looking for a soul mate who will love us, and no other. Why would I want to waste my time with a hooker who really doesn't like sex?

L.Guapo1028 reads

Because they don't want to be where a bunch of dicks have already been.  Result?  They are the first one to eat the splooge of her SO who barebacked her before she came to work.

GaGambler947 reads

I had a GF schedule a 6:00 AM appointment so at about 5:30 AM she starts trying to get me out of bed and out the door so she could "go to work" well I wasn't going anywhere without "getting a little" first and by the time I took care of my morning wood and she finally got me out the door it was probably about one minute to six. I was going to read her reviews to see if anyone tasted "something funny" but I never got around to it as I never really liked to read her reviews.

but yeah that guy only thought that a 6:00AM appointment guaranteed that he was "first"

There are two good reasons why I might prefer a low volume provider,

Firstly there is more likelihood that they have outside interests and activities and we can chat about more than sex and the prices on the international lube market, yes talking is all part of the fun,

And secondly that they're unlikely to be a clock watcher and aren't likely to be constantly checking their watch to kick you out in time for them to prepare for their next client. Of course a provider is going to see many other clients, I just don't want to be passing them on the hall, either arriving or leaving.

Ultimately if I like a provider I'm going to see her again no matter how many clients she sees, I like a relaxed meeting with time to talk so obviously I'm going to go for ladies who can provide this

One would think even a high volume provider would have more free time than the average person.  
Also your second point leads me to believe that part of the problem is that not only are the providers high volume, but low budget. If you're paying 300+ an hour and seeing well-reviewed girls, I don't think either of these would be an issue. Regardless of how many clients they see.

Why is it that a hooker can't be "high-volume" and have other pursuits? There is no reason at all why a hooker can't fuck 8 dudes in a day at $150/hr a pop and not have a full, enriched life outside of hooking. The average work day is 8 hours, right? And women who work 8-hour workdays that aren't hookers have enriched lives, right? Need you be reminded that hookers aren't just hookers, they're also human beings that might have families, children, hobbies, goals, and whatever else the fuck they want to have. Being a "high-volume" hooker and being a multi-faceted individual are not mutually exclusive, and to think otherwise is insulting.

Secondly, if you paid for an hour, and hour is what you get. I don't understand all the barking and carrying on about "clock-watching".  You paid for an hour's worth of time; whether you paid $150 or $700 for that hour, an hour is what you get.  Most hookers, believe it or not, schedule accordingly, and if you book me from 1-2 and i have a client coming at 2:30, you'd better believe that you'd be out my door by 2:05 so that i can prepare for my next client.  That's not clock watching; thats you getting what you paid for and me holding up my end of the deal. Because hell, if i were turning 7 tricks a day, you better believe i'd be scheduling at least half an hour between my tricks to make sure my pussy was taken care of.  Fucking 7 dudes in a row is physically hard on a pussy.  

Basically, the term "low-volume" was coined to make both hookers and johns feel better about what they do.  It insinuates that sex work that isn't "low-volume" is dirty, because low-volume hookers don't see as many cocks and therefore aren't disease-infested cesspools.  That's just utter nonsense. The terms "high-volume" and "low-volume" might as well be replaced with "dirty" and "clean"; at least then we'd know what the fuck everyone is talking about.  

Both terms are whorephobic and serve no purpose.  If people need to feel better or less guilty about their participation in this industry, that's on them, not on other hookers.

To be honest, that is not my experience. We often go beyond that stated time, and sometimes WAY beyond it, as many girls know this is a value added service and keeps the client coming back for repeat business.

Its just good biz to give people more than what they expect, isn't it?

It doesn't mean a gal has to do it, but it increases the odds I will see her again.  

I look it as a menu option...BBBJ...DATY...OTC.

Not sure why some get all bent about this

If you're booking an hour and expect an hour and a half or 2, that expectation is just flat out uncalled for.  

you want to book an extended 4+ hour date where we'll be going out, eating, fucking, playing, fucking, and doing things? Duh.  That's where throwing in extra time makes perfectly good business sense. That's also where reduced rates make perfectly good business sense, and lots of ladies significantly reduce their hourly rates in order to encourage longer bookings.  I get where you're coming from there.  

but i think the automatic expectation of OTC time is a bit, well, uncalled for.  I'd never go into a restaurant, order a $95 Ribeye, and negotiate with the restaurant to give me the $35 steak tartare appetizer for free because I'm spending damn near $100 on a piece of meat.  It's my choice to spend that money on that piece of meat.  If I want steak 2 ways, i have to pay for it, ya know?

GaGambler836 reads

I am the opposite, I rarely book 2-4  hour dates. I usually either book a single hour, or all night. I don't do a lot of appointments in between.  I don't expect OTC time in an hour appointment, unless we simply get carried away. I do have some dates that are an hour of BCD time that end up with us going out OTC. I don't expect or plan those, but they do happen at times.

Now when I am somewhere like Costa Rica where the dynamic is completely different I do end up with a LOT of dates that last a couple of hours and I pretty much pay whatever I want to, but "whatever I want to" is usually more than the "going rate" if she doesn't demand it. I tend to be a lot more generous when the chica doesn't act too mercenary about it, and lets it be my idea to give her extra.

...and I can only speak for myself here, but:

most of my hooker money comes from dates under 3 hours in length.  While I can only speak for myself, I'd venture it a safe bet that a large number of ladies out there slangin' pussy would say the same.  There are those that specifically market themselves for and only take longer dates, so I'm not speaking about those ladies.

So when I hear someone getting bent out of shape about a girl being a clock-watcher, it's because when you pay for that short a period of time, there shouldn't be any expectation of added time benefits. Longer dates? Fuck it. I plan for longer dates, block off entire evenings.  Shorter dates? I've definitely got other things going on afterwards, and some of those things will be time sensitive.  

I don't spend a lot of time on this board, but I'm sure this has had to be addressed in the past.  I'm not one to over-inflate my number or length of bookings, and I'd tend to think that most people who hire hookers tend to hire them less frequently than not, and for shorter periods of time. Am I wrong in that assumption

GaGambler692 reads

I don't keep up with Jack's mongering habits either, but I do remember that in many of our "conversations" about both overnight dates and his negotiating he has stated many times that even he does not negotiate or expect OTC time for shorter dates.

As for me, when in this country I do tend to have single hour appointments, but I do so several times in an average week. When on vacation I spend more time with the ladies. BTW I try to take at least short "vacations" at least a couple of times a month, but then again, I am not "most people"

Much appreciated conversation and clarification.  

I think the gripes that come from hookers pertaining to OTC time and clock-watching complaints are due to the fact that most hookers book appointments from 1-2 hours in length.  

Hell, if i had your life, i'd monger all over the place.  

carry on, sir.  carry on. :)

That's certainly true for me, too.  There's just no real incentive to spent OTC time with a client who's only booked an hour or two. At the end of the day, regardless of how enjoyable our time together is-- this isn't a civvie date.  An hour means an hour.  If you enjoy my company enough that you find that an hour together just isn't enough... Book more time.  I'm usually happy to extend a session!  But it's ridiculous to assume that most providers value a single client's business (and a client who doesn't book more than an hour or two, no less) SO much, that they're willing to work what amounts to unpaid overtime in an effort to keep the client coming back for more.  And besides, most of us lead pretty full lives.  I'm sure we all have better, more important, or just other things to do than work for free.  

I totally understand that no one likes to be rushed to the door with their pants around their ankles the moment the clock hits 60 minutes, but that's why it's the client's responsibility to book a long enough session for them to feel truly satisfied.

JoelGoodsen876 reads

I have to confess, I consider OTC time to be as much me giving of myself as the provider giving of her time.  At the risk of seeming immodest my time outside of what was contracted for is sort of valuable too.  And if we hang out afterwards, I'm happy to pay for dinner and maybe a little shopping or a movie, but it's because we like each other's company.  I never consider it to be her taking advantage of me, my money (what i bring to the bargain), or my time.  

I do mostly out calls with women I know well.  I contract generally for 2 or 3 hours.  That's all I feel I need to pay for to satisfy my needs.  If a provider wants to stay longer then that will generally be great by me; I asked her for the date originally because I really like being with her and hope she feels the same.  But if we make a night of it I'm neither coercing, stealing, nor begging them to stay.   This is two people taking the other off the clock.  It's mutual.  We're people.  And my going rate is as much as some provider's and more than many, and I'm guessing I fill up a lot more hours in a week so I've yet to figure out what makes my time less valuable.    

Yes, staying when it has not been mutually agreed upon can be a selfish act (especially where a provider has another appointment coming up), but to be honest I have had several hookers stay way longer than we agreed to without it being discussed and I never consider it selfish on their part.  I guess the incentive is that they like being there and I like being with them, even after I get what I came for.    

I don't think I have too many pet peeves, but hearing that OTC time is a unilateral gift bestowed upon the monger is one of them.

And you have said you do not with 1 or two hours. Hey if the hooker gives it to you, and you repeat fine.  

Some of us don't offer that long a session for many reason s and don't offer OTC for a guy they have seen a couple of times after an hour session. I have too much other shit I want to do and need to do to waste it on a guy I might have seen two or three times. The ONLY way I would do that was if he tipped or was super easy as a john..then I might want to keep him. Otherwise 60 minutes equals 60 minutes and buh bye.

-- Modified on 7/24/2015 6:41:01 PM

GaGambler851 reads

I may borrow it from time to time.

These whorephobic myths and stereotypes seem to come from guys who were raised to believe that all "whores" are dirty, that they are dirty from seeing you dirty whores and that the less whorelike you are, and the less like a trick they can convince themselves that they are, the less dirty they feel after consorting with you dirty little whores.

Why do you think they take such offense at being called a john or a trick and insist on calling themselves "hobbyists" as if a sanitized name will erase the "sins" they are committing?  

BTW, I LIKE committing sins. Drinking, gambling and fucking beautiful women are among my most favorite pastimes. The very concept of hell is ludicrous to me, but if there is a hell, it's where me and all my friends are going to be.

BTW does that mean that us "high volume" guys are dirty too?

I sure HOPE that they will be dirty with me!  ;)

..but generally speaking, guys get away with being hypersexual sans the connotation of being "dirty".  You're only a dirty dude in civvie life if you're seeing a hooker, right

GaGambler952 reads

The religious crowd looks down on you of course, but they look down on everybody while doing whatever sick, perverted things they do in secret. Soccer moms tend to outwardly act shocked and like they would never touch you with a ten foot pole, but then they tend to get curious. Most married guys look at my lifestyle with jealousy, but beg me not to say anything around their wives.  

Yes, it is kind of interesting how people react when told that you fuck hookers with regularity, and yes, bedding a lot of civvie chicks makes you a stud, and not dirty at all, even though the chances of catching something from a bunch of drunken bar hookups with civvies is a LOT riskier than fucking thousands of hookers, but playing safely.

First of all it wasn't my intention to be whorophobic in any way and if it came across like that I honestly apologise.

You're absolutely right with regard to providers having full lives outside of their work, no matter how many men they see. I was thinking specifically of ladies I know with full time jobs, so they are part time providers, and chats we've had. I should have explained myself better.

Time management is obviously important but I have had experience on a couple of occasions of ladies stopping immediately and telling me it's time to go, yes that's all the time we agreed and I paid for so I can't ask for more, but I suppose it's always nicer when you're eased out the door instead of being kicked out.

Ultimately, and as I said, if I like a lady I will go back to see her, no matter what volume of clients she sees, if I try to arrange an appointment and she says no it doesn't matter whether she's busy with a client or with another part of her life, I'll just try to pick a time that suits and go from there

And i totally understand where you're coming from with the above being said.

No one likes being rushed out the door.  Sometimes it can't be helped. other times, it can be.  A lady can choose to run her business as she sees fit, and an on-the-dot timed session is definitely one way someone can run their business. It's all valid.  That being said, if someone is doing something with their business that you personally don't like, the best way to voice your opinion, aside from a review, is to spend your money elsewhere.  I'd  assume that's what most of you mongers would do anyway. ;)

Like you said; the number of clients a lady sees shouldn't impact someone's decision to see her.  A lot of other things should, including how she runs her business.  If how she runs it is to your taste, then that's what should matter

I LOVE skydiving and I love the beach, but guess what... when I go without those things every damn day I love them a hell of a lot more when I get them back. I love sex just as much as the next person, but if you force me to do it 3 times a day several days a week, you're not getting the best of me nor am I going to always be in the mood. I mean cmon. I do not work before 10 am or after 7 pm for a reason... I don't fkin want to lol.  

Posted By: GaGambler
I keep seeing this over and over again. Women brag about being low volume and men rush to claim they are lying about it, but why do so many guys want a "low volume" hooker in the first place?  
   
 Are you guys secretly hoping that she is saving up all her sexual energy for you? Or do you think that somehow she is going to wear out her pussy by seeing other guys? Or do you think that a woman who fucks more than one guy a day is a 'dirty little whore" and somehow not good enough for you? What is this obsession with "low volume" hookers?  
   
 Some of you guys remind me of the Islamic nut jobs hoping to get those 72 virgins in paradise, who the fuck wants virgins? I want hot, sexy, horny women who want to rock my world. In my experience "low volume" women really don't like to fuck or else they'd be out fucking more. What am  I missing here?  
   
 By all definitions I accept the fact that I am a "high volume" guy. I LIKE to fuck. No, I LOVE to fuck. This is hookerviille not a church social where we are looking for a soul mate who will love us, and no other. Why would I want to waste my time with a hooker who really doesn't like sex?

Just because a provider is "high volume" doesn't mean she likes to fuck.

Just because a provider is "low volume" doesn't mean she doesn't like to fuck.

In both cases, other factors may be at play

giant shrimp.

or bigfoot.  lol

(That's all relative anyway- a lady who sees 5 guys a day is low volume compared to one who sees 10 a day). I used to see streetwalkers and I use AMPs occasionally. Those are pretty much high volume by definition. As long as I get good service and attitude, and she is not tired and sore from seeing a bunch of guys before me, (and she cleans up between) then I don't really care if I'm her only guy that month, or the 10th that day!

-- Modified on 7/23/2015 4:57:50 PM

cashorcredit729 reads

They see low volume and they think they're getting a provider with low mileage on her pussy, just like the idiots who want the first appointment of the day... well at least they thought they were the first appointment lol.

I'm no physic, which means I have no way of knowing a providers volume...... low high

it's not a deciding factor for me when mongering.

hydrate843 reads

do you really believe that providers do this because they like sex? they do this job for money like you do your job for money....I cannot believe your reasoning...boy you have no grasp of this whatsoever..

Posted By: GaGambler
I keep seeing this over and over again. Women brag about being low volume and men rush to claim they are lying about it, but why do so many guys want a "low volume" hooker in the first place?  
   
 Are you guys secretly hoping that she is saving up all her sexual energy for you? Or do you think that somehow she is going to wear out her pussy by seeing other guys? Or do you think that a woman who fucks more than one guy a day is a 'dirty little whore" and somehow not good enough for you? What is this obsession with "low volume" hookers?  
   
 Some of you guys remind me of the Islamic nut jobs hoping to get those 72 virgins in paradise, who the fuck wants virgins? I want hot, sexy, horny women who want to rock my world. In my experience "low volume" women really don't like to fuck or else they'd be out fucking more. What am  I missing here?  
   
 By all definitions I accept the fact that I am a "high volume" guy. I LIKE to fuck. No, I LOVE to fuck. This is hookerviille not a church social where we are looking for a soul mate who will love us, and no other. Why would I want to waste my time with a hooker who really doesn't like sex?

Skyfyre835 reads

IMOHO I actually believe "high-volume" are BETTER to have:

1)  They are PROVEN to like or at least tolerate sex with men... and lot of sex at that! No GPS here...

2)  They are willing to WORK not lazy sitting on their asses watching soap while waiting for an occasional big spender/sucker.

3)  High volume means they've developed more tolerance to different whims of men meaning less likely to have silly cock-block rules.

4)  Practice makes perfect: it's only logical and I can attest to it: high-volume sex workers have more skill and are better at what they do. To wit, many times I saw AMP (asian massage parlor) girls who at first disappoint because they look only average at best and many are MILFs not even hot young things. I would think "hell no way am I going to get off with this!" but was later shocked at how quick they could skillfully got me off in 15-20min. flat no matter how much I tried to fight and stall it

I'm with you on number 4,  there's really no substitute for experience.  But I just can't get behind 1-3.  

1.  If a provider has sex with you, she *is* at the very least tolerating it.  Unfortunately, I'm sure not all providers *like* having sex with their clients... but if it was truly intolerable, I can't imagine that they'd be there in the first place.  

2.  Saying that "low volume" providers (however you chose to define that) are lazy is incredibly insulting.  First of all, it's ridiculous to assume that you know enough about every provider's personal life that you can even make a guess about what they do in their off time.  There are providers from all walks of life with all kinds of responsibilities, jobs, and interests that they devote time to when they aren't seeing clients.  I don't know where you came up with the idea that if a provider has decided that she'd rather not see as many clients as is physically possible every single day, that the only obvious alternative is that she's sitting on her ass "watching soap", but it says a LOT about how little you think of us.

3.  There is no such thing as a "silly cock-block rule".  Providers set rules about THEIR time and THEIR bodies for a whole host of reasons... None of which you have the right to dismiss as silly.  If you don't like a provider's rules... find another provider! There are SO many, I guarantee that you will find someone who will give you exactly the experience you're looking for.  But to say that a provider's rules are silly assumes that YOU know better than SHE does what she should and shouldn't do with her body and time.  Sorry, guy, but you don't.

Posted By: THEAvaStClaire
I'm with you on number 4,  there's really no substitute for experience.  But I just can't get behind 1-3.    
   
 1.  If a provider has sex with you, she *is* at the very least tolerating it.  Unfortunately, I'm sure not all providers *like* having sex with their clients... but if it was truly intolerable, I can't imagine that they'd be there in the first place.    
   
 2.  Saying that "low volume" providers (however you chose to define that) are lazy is incredibly insulting.  First of all, it's ridiculous to assume that you know enough about every provider's personal life that you can even make a guess about what they do in their off time.  There are providers from all walks of life with all kinds of responsibilities, jobs, and interests that they devote time to when they aren't seeing clients.  I don't know where you came up with the idea that if a provider has decided that she'd rather not see as many clients as is physically possible every single day, that the only obvious alternative is that she's sitting on her ass "watching soap", but it says a LOT about how little you think of us.  
   
 3.  There is no such thing as a "silly cock-block rule".  Providers set rules about THEIR time and THEIR bodies for a whole host of reasons... None of which you have the right to dismiss as silly.  If you don't like a provider's rules... find another provider! There are SO many, I guarantee that you will find someone who will give you exactly the experience you're looking for.  But to say that a provider's rules are silly assumes that YOU know better than SHE does what she should and shouldn't do with her body and time.  Sorry, guy, but you don't.

However majority of my rendezvous are 4-12 hours :D
btw, low volume to me is around 3 or 4 gents a week.
a lady can be low volume but I do get what you're saying.  Even I want a horny ass woman, man or both would be even better. I'm scared of virgins though lol
Hugs and kisses
TL

...In my experience "low volume" women really don't like to fuck or else they'd be out fucking more....

I don't fuck a lot of men on the job but I do love sex, just not with old, fat, out of shape guys who are not good in bed. I do it enough for the amount of extra cash I want and that's all I can tolerate.  

In real life with the right partner I want it multiple times a DAY because I am attracted and turned on. HUGE difference.

I prefer a normal girl that just does this once in a while  
a girl that has a life outside this community.

if you want to see a girl that bangs 50 dudes a week  
good for you

I think a girl banging 5 random dudes is a dirty little whore

and that turns me on

it turns me on that she is going home to her boyfriend or her mom and dad!
it wouldn't turn me on if I knew you just left and another dude is waiting in his car for me to leave.

and she is just punching the clock.
I want her to remember my cock

Register Now!