You said her body pics are accurate, thus I assume you found her body attractive. You said you had a good time. Why not write about your overall experience, and give her fair scores, with the Appearance score taking her body into account also. You might choose to not mention that you found her face attractive or unattractive.  That's a very subjective thing. Did you like anything about her face?  Smile, eyes, lips, ... ?  You could mention that.  

I met a provider not long ago who has an amazing body, especially considering her age but it's better than most women half her age. Her face has had no work and isn't ugly at all, but shows the signs of a full life, well lived, and someone who enjoys the outdoors. Personally I think she's very attractive, with bright eyes, great smile, and talented lips. But I know many other guys would think she's "rough" looking.  To each his own.  

You had a good time with a very nice/cool/sweet woman who posts accurate photos. It sounds to me like she deserves a positive review, even if you don't give her high marks for Appearance. Be honest but kind.

Or maybe it's that I'd have absolutely no chance with any of the providers that I've been with, IRL.

I don't see bargain basement ladies, as a rule. So I haven't been with many ladies that I couldn't give high marks to for appearance. I do pay close attention to detail though.

reviews

I totally get what you are saying. One time I gave someone a 7 and my next potential date did not want to see me because she want all her reviews to be 10s or at the very least 9s. I also read somewhere re joining a private party that the providers would first screen what kind of reviews you were giving out (number wise). Their thinking is if this guy keep giving low review numbers, at the very least - he is a pain in the ass - so we do not want him around. I would suggest that if you are going to write the above review, do so eloquently in the general/juicy section about how you really feel. Most of us can read between the lines and get what your experience was like.

My thought here is that you should not review her.  Just because you don't doesn't mean she will not be a reference for you, though you shouldn't unless you are planning to see her again.  

On the other hand, if you did review, would your looks rating of her be significantly lower than her average?  And would your performance rating be equal to her average or better?  Things you need to consider...

She deserves a minimum of a 7. If she was real nice to you and didn't rip you off, you should consider that.  Not a clock watcher and gave you the full time? Be nice to her. Too many ripoffs and B&S out there so reward her for being legit.

If you had limp dick no matter what she did, review her accordingly.  

You said you had a good time, so go with that. If she was so nice to you, yeah you can burn her bridges by being mean. She didn't lie and kept her end... so all you can do is review nicely or not at all.  

Very nice of you to think of her feelings vs the asshats who get picky and leave 6 or 7's when they write reviews like she is the next big thing@!!!

You can still be honest in your assessment.  You can simply talk about what you DID like in your session with the lady.  Maybe she had pretty eyes, great hair, nice teeeth or made your feel good. There are lots of ways to write about your experience with out slamming the lady.  The smart guys will be able to "read between the lines" I also find that with a little homework you should know exactly what you are getting from a provider in terms of looks as well as performance.  Do your homework!

For me, my experience, the provider's physical attributes and her personality determines how I write a review.  I try to be as honest as I can without exaggerating anything.

I will never rate a provider's appearance anything lower than "nice" regardless of the situation.  I fall into the category of "treat others as you would like to be treated...."

I have seen reviews on provider's that I have also reviewed and the review has been horribly negative.  Upon seeing this I know as a fact that the experience with said provider wouldn't be that negative even with her worse day on earth.

I'm not 100% positive but I THINK provider's sometimes talk with one another.  They get the word out to alert others of who the bad hobbyists are, just as we do in our (honest ) reviews alerting others of rip offs.  Although I think the girls talk behind the scenes more than us guys lol

Hobby on and gave a great weekend!

I have bee fortunate in my hobbying so it has been easy for me, but I have --of course-- had some experiences that were less than what I would have wanted.  I don't write those reviews: The lady may have had a bad day, she may have found me a special turn off, she may be worried about money or a sick relative etc. I recognize that a bad review can interfere with her livelihood. While I feel it is my duty to my fellow hobbyists not to give a good review to someone with whom I had a less than satisfying experience, I do not feel it is my duty to warn about someone  with whom I had such an experience  (Obviously if it was a bait and switch or a no show or the pics were fake or she was outrageous --and that has never happened to me-- I would write that review.)  
So i write the good ones and do not review the thankfully few honest efforts that just weren't good for me.

Where the performance was so good that it raised the providers appearance score by one or two points.  

During the heat of the moment, I gladly admit to falling into a state of delusion whilst in the full effect of her sexual aura. I do like women with very different styles, shapes, sizes and looks for a nice varied spice of life thing.  Taking each woman and weighing her against my personal view of what I find desirable, and not in comparison to another woman's looks.  I've read here many times that the level of attraction is in the eye of the beholder.

eading the comments, it's occurring to me that our demimonde might  actually have an easier time seeing beyond looks to the actual person than this society taken as a whole.  

Is it possible that unrequited desire, stirred up by mass media, (Victoria's Secret ad campaign, for example) encourages objectification?  Maybe getting physical scratches the itch, and we can look out of unclouded eyes and empathize better?

...and most of us discount it somewhat when doing our research, especially since it is so subjective. What you consider unattractive, someone else might not. What is important is the general and juicy details. And you can write just what you wrote in your post, which seems like you had a good experience.  

I think sometimes the ladies do themselves a disservice with all their marketing and hype which set unrealistic expectations on the part of the men. Some of us that have been in the game awhile understand this and adjust our expectations accordingly.

Also, just as important as the external beauty is the internal beauty... And it seems this gal you met has that in abundance.

Just my dos centavos...

-- Modified on 6/19/2015 7:55:43 AM

So you just mean her face then?  

Hmmm... I'd say factor that into her appearance rating but dude, don't say that. "I don't like your face?" Big ouch...

Otherwise, appearance and performance are separate- nice doesn't affect pretty.

If she is not that attractive(subjective, but please we all know the difference) She probably knows it all ready. You won't be telling her something she doesn't already know. She makes up for it with personality and skill. I have a favorite who is "plain" but is my ATF. Why, more than anything else because of her personality.  Stress that in your review. She is also the truest GFE I have ever been with. My fav actually prefers reviews that asses her looks, personality and skills honestly. I find that many hookers don't want inflated reviews because they are then expected to live up to said reviews.  

A good number of reviewers may fall into your 1-4 but I have found no matter your reviews or what you say on the boards there will always be a hooker willing to take your money. Honestly I have never had a one who asked for my TER handle. I have great references and that is all you really need.

Instead of trying to find the right adjectives, you could compare her looks to someone others might know. There was an episode of The Office where they spent the day debating whether Hilary Swank is hot. If you said she had a face like Meryl Streep, I'm sure some would think that's great and others would stay away. Just don't say she looks like Mickey Rourke in The Wrestler. That would be crossing the line.