PRINCE, I WOULD THINK YOU'LL ABLE TO UNDERSTAND THIS ODDITY. I'M SURE YOU'RE A MUCH BIGGER PAIN IN THE BUT IN PERSON.
A fairly constant refrain from guys who submit reviews is that the lady is more attractive in person than in the photos. Why is that? I seldom hear that comment in other arenas. What is the cause of this phenomenon? Is it bad photographers? While it is true that some people are more photogenic than in real life, why is it seemingly not true "in the business"?
Normally when you meet a provider and get to know them, they become more beautiful than their pictures could ever capture. Personality is a very beautiful thing if it is good. However, someone may be a knockout in photos but once she opens her mouth, she turns ulgy. I've learned my lesson through interviews...the best looking and most photogenic girl I ever interviewed was never hired because of her personality and attitude. Also, many of these girls are not models and don't have high priced photographers who can turn them into models for the camera. Natural beauty is often missed in photos...the girl is shy and the lighting isn't perfect, etc. I know all of my girls personally and believe that they are all much more beautiful in person. That is why it is best not to judge anyone by a photo alone. If you think that the photo is ok, I bet you are going to think the girl is great!!
Vanessa comes to mind as someone who is much more attractive in person. I think maybe the photographer tries to catch a certain imagine that they think will sell. When the truth is when you capture who the person really is that is what sells.
Its the diffrence between a fake smile and a real smile.