The good news is, you don't have to be "hot" to be a great actress. Just look at Meryl Streep, I can't see her ever being more than a 5 at her best either. Maybe a four if we are going to be honest about it.
In a thread below a dispute evolved over whether (basically) a woman who was in her 40s but looked in her 30s was a complement. I don't want to rehash the debate but I just watched Bull Durham. Susan Sarandon was 42 when she played that role and they didn't try to make her look younger. She looked late 30s early 40s. But God Damn did she look sexy.
Yes age is a factor, I doubt she is as attractive to me now as she was then. But age isn't everything. I would take Susan Sarandon at 42 over 99% of the women (even "better" looking women) in the world.
There is something more than just physical beauty that comes from within that adds to physical beauty and transcends it.
I just watched Bull Durham. Susan Sarandon was 42 when she played that role...But God Damn did she look sexy. I would take Susan Sarandon at 42 over 99% of the women (even "better" looking women) in the world.
Sarandon is an excellent actress, but I've never considered her beautiful--even when she was young like in Rocky Horror (Dammit Janet!). But there are a few older actresses who can steal the show with sheer erotic allure. I'm thinking of Jane Seymour in Wedding Crashers (call me Kitty-Kat!). I think JS was 50+ in that film & I would've definitely fucked that hot kitty, lol. --z
Sorry guys, but I have to disagree. Call me a shallow pig, but what most of you are doing is to point out the extreme exceptions to the rule. First off, I did not find Susan Sarandon the least bit attractive in that role, and secondly although there are a few 40+ knockouts in the world, by and large once a woman reaches even 30 their bodies, faces, skin, start to show some wear and tear.
IMO, for every attractive 40 year old, I can show you an even more attractive 25 year old, simply by digging up a picture of the same woman 15 years earlier. lol
This of course is strictly my opinion, others are free to disagree, and I am sure MANY of you will do so. lol
Perhaps their rarity is part of what makes them so appealing. I agree that many don't take care of themselves and "go to seed", but when you come across those that do, it's really striking. Personally I've always been more attracted to older women. In general they seem to be more unselfish, understanding, and patient.
Posted By: GaGambler
but ugly goes clean to the bone" lol
Sorry guys, but I have to disagree. Call me a shallow pig, but what most of you are doing is to point out the extreme exceptions to the rule. First off, I did not find Susan Sarandon the least bit attractive in that role, and secondly although there are a few 40+ knockouts in the world, by and large once a woman reaches even 30 their bodies, faces, skin, start to show some wear and tear.
IMO, for every attractive 40 year old, I can show you an even more attractive 25 year old, simply by digging up a picture of the same woman 15 years earlier. lol
This of course is strictly my opinion, others are free to disagree, and I am sure MANY of you will do so. lol
Cher is the only woman I've ever seen who looked better at 65 than at 20. At 20 she had thin lips, no pronounced cheekbones, average-looking eyes, and no boobs. Amazing what a couple of mil in plastic surgery will do. ;
In a thread below a dispute evolved over whether (basically) a woman who was in her 40s but looked in her 30s was a complement. I don't want to rehash the debate but I just watched Bull Durham. Susan Sarandon was 42 when she played that role and they didn't try to make her look younger. She looked late 30s early 40s. But God Damn did she look sexy.
Yes age is a factor, I doubt she is as attractive to me now as she was then. But age isn't everything. I would take Susan Sarandon at 42 over 99% of the women (even "better" looking women) in the world.
There is something more than just physical beauty that comes from within that adds to physical beauty and transcends it.
I'd drag my balls over 2 miles of broken beer bottles just to lay where she pissed last.
Seriously though, she is wow, yummy, humina humina. Sexiest, most beautiful woman alive of any age, as far as I'm concerned. That's my opinion, I didn't charge you for it, and that's what it's worth.
I would drag his balls over broken glass to be able to fuck her as well. lol
but would I pay over five hundred bucks??? That's a much harder question. Well actually a better question would be, "would I pay over five hundred bucks to fuck a woman who looked just like her, but wasn't famous?" Getting a shot at a celebrity would be worth a lot more just for bragging rights, even if it's a woman you don't find breathtaking. Unless that celebrity is someone like Rosie Odonnell of course. lol
...and when I'm in the clubs I usually chase after the 18-25yo group. This gal was pretty in a GND way. Even in the dark lighting I could see that she was older than all of the other dancers, but she sat down with me and we began to chat, and her inner beauty and amazing personality shown thru. I wound up dropping a good amount of money on her in VIP. After she left me, I had several of the (much) younger dancers approach me and ask if I enjoyed my dances with grandma!!! The bitter jealousy that those younger dancers exhibited made them very ugly to me, so I declined their dance offerings. I hope that "grandma" will be there the next time I'm there so that I can see her again
The only stripper that really got me going danced "for me" to this song. After that she would sit with me and talk and stuff, not hustling me but still working the floor. Good time with a 39 year old that many consider over the hill but she made the most of any of the gals on day shift and was not bitchy with the other dancers. Last timei went, she was gone and I was invisible. their loss.
was 46 when she did the Thomas Crown Affair, take a look at that movie, i'll take her at 46!!! She is 61 now but I haven't seen her lately..
Posted By: LuciusApuleius
In a thread below a dispute evolved over whether (basically) a woman who was in her 40s but looked in her 30s was a complement. I don't want to rehash the debate but I just watched Bull Durham. Susan Sarandon was 42 when she played that role and they didn't try to make her look younger. She looked late 30s early 40s. But God Damn did she look sexy.
Yes age is a factor, I doubt she is as attractive to me now as she was then. But age isn't everything. I would take Susan Sarandon at 42 over 99% of the women (even "better" looking women) in the world.
There is something more than just physical beauty that comes from within that adds to physical beauty and transcends it.
They are more experienced and really know how to please a man!
So yes younger providers are also nice to have fun with at times.
Just for me it's something about a woman with experience.
Posted By: LuciusApuleius
In a thread below a dispute evolved over whether (basically) a woman who was in her 40s but looked in her 30s was a complement. I don't want to rehash the debate but I just watched Bull Durham. Susan Sarandon was 42 when she played that role and they didn't try to make her look younger. She looked late 30s early 40s. But God Damn did she look sexy.
Yes age is a factor, I doubt she is as attractive to me now as she was then. But age isn't everything. I would take Susan Sarandon at 42 over 99% of the women (even "better" looking women) in the world.
There is something more than just physical beauty that comes from within that adds to physical beauty and transcends it.
Physical beauty is plentiful, but attractiveness is much more rare.
Imagine being given a beautifully wrapped gift, only to find it is empty inside. Or a gift wrapped in old newspapers that is so beautiful it makes you weep.
Attractiveness is much more than physical beauty, and age is but a number.
Make no apologies for what (who) you find attractive
Usually older women Have confidence without arrogance. That is a very sexy quality. I'd take a 40 something over a 20 something any day.
Posted By: LuciusApuleius
In a thread below a dispute evolved over whether (basically) a woman who was in her 40s but looked in her 30s was a complement. I don't want to rehash the debate but I just watched Bull Durham. Susan Sarandon was 42 when she played that role and they didn't try to make her look younger. She looked late 30s early 40s. But God Damn did she look sexy.
Yes age is a factor, I doubt she is as attractive to me now as she was then. But age isn't everything. I would take Susan Sarandon at 42 over 99% of the women (even "better" looking women) in the world.
There is something more than just physical beauty that comes from within that adds to physical beauty and transcends it.
If you were 30-40 years younger you would be more exposed to 20-something's and their sense of themselves and their confidence might not strike you as arrogant. You feel more comfortable around your own 'kind' so you feel more at ease with their version of confidence. It's no different.
And for the record, I also don't find Susan Sarandon attractive, now or ever. Blech.
A women's peak is approx 21,22 to about 28 or so. After 28, 29, and almost certainly over 30, major changes set in and it goes rapidly downhill from there.
What you are describing is the "famous effect" i.e. a women's beauty gets magnified simply because she is on tv, in the movies, etc. that British nanny on trial a few years ago was a perfect example of that. Below average looking girl but she was on tv everyday and dumbass dudes hearts all went a flutter.
Reese Whitherspoon is another one. She's "ok" looking, nothing special. She is today's version of Meg Ryan, another very average looking women vaulted to hot status by silly dudes who can't see past her fame.
Since many women that hook here are over 30, and some even over 40, coupled with the fact that there are tons of BSU candidates here, we tend to get all the "beauty is skin deep" crap.
Gimme an unknown 25 year old hottie over an ancient Susan Sarandon every day of the week. Even back when she was in Bull Shit Durham. Lol.
I agree with your conclusion, Susan Sarandon never did anything for me, and for the life of me, I can't figure out why Reese Witherspoon is supposed to be hot. Now, Meg Ryan, she may not have been a traditional beauty, but her personality just made her shine.
However, what's that stuff about women peaking in their 20s? There are women who look darned good well into their 50s without the aid of a scalpel. Really, no need to be a BSU candidate, beauty transcends age, at least for some people. Then there is the sexual aspect, I would argue that women don't peak until their late 30s and 40s. Then again, for guys who only fuck 18 to 25 year olds, you would not know that
but I doubt if any of the guys who aren't into old broads haven't at least tried an old broad or two before reaching their conclusion.
I have fucked several old broads, and reached the conclusion that I like younger women MUCH better than old ones. I do of course reserve the right to change my mind at any time of my choosing, but for the foreseeable future I don't plan on seeing many women much over about 35 tops.
That should be good news for the rest of you, as one less guy who likes OTHFBC members, is one less guys competing for their affections. lol
I mean, would someone say, 'yes, she looks good for 45, I would fuck her, but if she were really 30, then she would look too old for 30, so, no, I would not fuck her.' Huh? A woman either does it for me or not, age has absolutely nothing to do with it.
I will admit that my bias is not to go for too young and it really does not have anything to do with the standard line of whether we have things in common or not, because really, you can have good sex with someone you have nothing in common with, it has more to do with feeling like a perv. (the preceding notwithstanding, yes, I do like it when I have something in common with a partner, and yes, I do sometimes go for a little under 25, I am just stating generalities, not that anybody really gives a fuck)
Theres no way around it, personally I can't pay a compliment that I can't believe. No other factors apply.
Posted By: LuciusApuleius
In a thread below a dispute evolved over whether (basically) a woman who was in her 40s but looked in her 30s was a complement. I don't want to rehash the debate but I just watched Bull Durham. Susan Sarandon was 42 when she played that role and they didn't try to make her look younger. She looked late 30s early 40s. But God Damn did she look sexy.
Yes age is a factor, I doubt she is as attractive to me now as she was then. But age isn't everything. I would take Susan Sarandon at 42 over 99% of the women (even "better" looking women) in the world.
There is something more than just physical beauty that comes from within that adds to physical beauty and transcends it.
Not all 30 year olds look 30, and not all 40 year old look 40. My last "age appropriate" GF looked easily ten years younger than her true age, and routinely got carded until about 35.
I will agree that I also have a hard time paying a compliment that I don't believe, I suppose I would make a lousy hooker for that reason.
Unfortunately it looks like your attempt to purchase VIP membership has failed due to your card being declined. Good news is that we have several other payment options that you could try.
VIP MEMBER
, you are now a VIP member!
We thank you for your purchase!
VIP MEMBER
, Thank you for becoming VIP member!
Membership should be activated shortly. You'll receive notification!
