That multiple hours generally makes for a higher price for a "date" I generally don't do as many as I would like to. As a guy who has to hide money from his household budget so that the SO doesn't realize its gone, large sums are hard to come by unless I wait excessicely long between sessions with providers. Since I do this for more sex, not less, I generally go for 1 hour sesssions at the perhaps more expensive hourly rate for 60 minutes than what would most of the time be a discounted multi hour rate. For example, a lot of gals will charge say 400/hr but only 600 or 700 for a 2 hour session. So the second hour is discounted, but the extra 2 or 300 will get me half or 3/4 of my way to my next date if I limit to 1 hour. See? Get 2 weeks close to another session, or at most get 1 more "pop" today. I usually opt for a faster 2nd session. Which is not to say I haven't done multi hours, just that it is infrequent for me. As for caring what a provider offers either multi or single, thats up to her. I personally am more likely to see a gal who offers both.
multiple hours, do you care if a lady doesn't offer a one hour appointment? Is there a reason that a greater time minimum would bother you? Might sound like a dumb question but I have my reasons for asking. 
Conversely, if you exclusively book engagements of two or more hours, would the fact that a lady offers an hour be an issue?
-- Modified on 12/6/2014 12:07:27 AM
-- Modified on 12/6/2014 12:09:03 AM
I do book multiple hour appointments on occasion but I can only do it when I travel. On my home turf the ladies mostly play in areas that are, shall we say, geographically undesirable. To do a one hour appointment I need to factor in two or more hours of round trip transit time. That's three+ hours that I need to be away from work and/or home, and that requires careful planning and maybe a web of lies, always dangerous. If a lady requires two or more hours I won't see her, even if I really want to, unless I can think up a really good cover story.
-- Modified on 12/5/2014 11:35:40 PM
I see add that say $20 for 10 min even thought. that 60 a hh i would avoid ladied that do short stays because thete are just trying to get you what cash they can from a poor soe like me.
-- Modified on 12/6/2014 12:28:55 AM
I don't generally look at the rates except for the amount of time I'm looking to book. If they do 15 minutes, that's up to them as long as my time is quality time.
A lady is entitled to whatever policies make sense to her but in a couple of decades of P4P I've had multi hour appointments exactly 2X.
nah, I'm just fuckin' with ya from the other thread, I absolutely loathe what I think of as clueless tacit racism....stay horny my friend
Now I think he is brilliant. A black dude trolling a whoremonger site under the name Chauncey Gardner as a gentry liberal is quite possibly the end of irony/humor/comedy/the universe.
That multiple hours generally makes for a higher price for a "date" I generally don't do as many as I would like to. As a guy who has to hide money from his household budget so that the SO doesn't realize its gone, large sums are hard to come by unless I wait excessicely long between sessions with providers. Since I do this for more sex, not less, I generally go for 1 hour sesssions at the perhaps more expensive hourly rate for 60 minutes than what would most of the time be a discounted multi hour rate. For example, a lot of gals will charge say 400/hr but only 600 or 700 for a 2 hour session. So the second hour is discounted, but the extra 2 or 300 will get me half or 3/4 of my way to my next date if I limit to 1 hour. See? Get 2 weeks close to another session, or at most get 1 more "pop" today. I usually opt for a faster 2nd session. Which is not to say I haven't done multi hours, just that it is infrequent for me. As for caring what a provider offers either multi or single, thats up to her. I personally am more likely to see a gal who offers both.
then it doesn't matter. I'd be more concerned with reviews supporting that she can handle a longer appointment - and no, I don't mean a continuous two hours of intercourse! But that she can manage the ebb & flow of energy in a way that time just disappears. Would expect GFE in a longer timeframe, a PSE in a shorter timeframe, and below an hour it's a rotating door.
Some are very good for shorter periods, but longer ones drain their batteries where 90 minutes drags on like three hours.
Others are nearly marathon energy managers and I've had six hours disappear in a blink.
If she offers a minimum then I assume that's the shortest period she's comfortable with for her performance. Now a woman who offers 30 minutes or a blow-n-go option is not as appealing to me, but given the right circumstance I'd see her - just not for a couple hour session!
I don't care if a woman doesn't book hourly sessions. I might unconsciously have a preference for those that don't.
If this is a marketing survey, it's an interesting one. I'd like to hear your findings.
There was a pair of ladies who required 90 minutes for a double that I was looking at the other day, and it seemed that a 90-minute minimum only made sense fore a double.
All that a multi-hour minimum demonstrates is that you're most likely lower volume than an hourly provider, simply because your pool of clients is smaller. Some guys get off on that "exclusivity" factor, but I imagine that they can be a pain in their own special way. Then, you have the guys who get pissy because they can't afford you. You just gotta pick the niche that works for you.
Personally, I've done the gamut, and I don't give a shit what transpires between her and another client. If she strikes my fancy, then I'll do what's necessary to make it happen.
I usually book one hour.
If there is a two hour minimum, which usually is more than I feel comfortable paying, I pass.
If a inexpensive short stay is offered I assume the personal contact I want would want is not there and the session would be mechanical despite the longer period.
... because majority of the time, it's all about clicking and connecting with each other.
If I scheduled an one hour session... both of us will know if we are compatible with each other. If so, then I will schedule the next session in multiple hours. If we are not compatible... I will not see the lady again and I move onto the next one.
So, if the lady only offers multiple hour sessions, I skip those. I focus my time on ladies who offer single hour and multiple hour sessions.
Conversely, if you exclusively book engagements of two or more hours, would the fact that a lady offers an hour be an issue?
-- Modified on 12/6/2014 12:07:27 AM
-- Modified on 12/6/2014 12:09:03 AM
and I can see there is more to this question than it might appear. I mean for me, I try to book a woman I want to see without really paying attention to what other sorts of appointments they offer, but then I got to thinking why would someone care because I really don't. So ok, I know there's the whole low volume/high volume discussion, and the 'first in the door/last out the door for the day' discussion, but I try my best to never think about where a woman has been or where she's going. I try to stay in the moment and hope she will too.
I will echo what has been said, that the only time a multi hour requirement may be a problem is for the first meeting as when I've done them I like 90 minutes as 2 hours with someone is a long time if we're not a good match. That might keep some people away because they are not willing to invest so much in a first meeting.
-- Modified on 12/6/2014 1:17:23 PM
-- Modified on 12/6/2014 1:53:12 PM
Appointments. The reason is that I usually only go once and most of the time I'm done in 45-50 minutes. If we don't connect then I either have to leave early or stick around and wait for my session to be over. If I leave early that's wasted money that could have been used towards a session with someone else. Now if we have a great time then I might book a longer appointment the next time. Although there is one lady that requires 90 min that I am waiting to see when she makes it back in my area.
Those who like multiple hours will book and those don’t won’t. In either way, you would be the based on your own experience. If you get more requests for multiple hours then it wouldn’t matter to you financially.
Has the human race lost the ability to make logical decisions in the social media age without posting it on social media?
'those who book multiple hours" and" exclusively book engagements of two or more hours,"
Conversely, if you exclusively book engagements of two or more hours, would the fact that a lady offers an hour be an issue?
-- Modified on 12/6/2014 12:07:27 AM
-- Modified on 12/6/2014 12:09:03 AM
One books multiple hours but may also book shorter engagements, as some have posted above. The other books only two hours or more. Key clue: the word "exclusively". 
-- Modified on 12/7/2014 2:01:28 PM
the answer is no. I dont care either way. I would just see her less.
I usually do four, six, overnights, full days, and multi-day deals.
Don't care if the provider in question offers one hour appointments, but I'm definitely more interested when I see a website that lists longer appointments and rates on the menu, as opposed to the ones that say something like, "longer dates possible, inquire for rates and availability".
They definitely give me valuable information to work with. Xo
particularly care to commit the resources for a multi-hour encounter if the chemistry is lacking.
Usually when I repeat with a lady, I will see her for multiple hours. I could care less if she offers 1-hr. appointments. IMHO, that is the minimum time necessary for a GFE experience. Now if she offered 15 or 20 minute dates, I would probably go in another direction.
There are also times when I only have an hour to play so I will either repeat with a lady or see a new lady. Time constraints to enter into the mix.