...locally with averages of 7.9/8.8 or number 50 with 8.41/8.55. I've seen several ladies that were Top 100 and I wasn't aware of it at the time because I don't pay much attention to it. I usually check it when someone brings it up in discussion. I was very happy with the session. There are a few cases where just one thing would put a lady on my DNS list but being on the Top 100 isn't one of them. Not all the ladies are manipulators and they go on the list whether they want to or not if their scores qualify them.
edited for grammar
-- Modified on 10/25/2014 9:59:14 AM
A lot of top rated ladies have been dropped which also meens they can't advertise I think. I wonder if they even know or care.
...the last 3 months. This does not effect their ability to advertise here or anywhere else. Though they obviously wouldn't be able to state they are Top 100 ,50, or 10 etc.
We all know how they get there, so for me Top 100=DNS.
And they are all over-priced.
Of the Top 100 ladies that I've met in person, every single one is insanely beautiful inside and out.
I've seen a few. Some retired. Some overrated. Some overpriced. But all were very hot, and I'd say the majority performed well above average. I struggle with gross generalizations. BUT, there is merit to the concern. There are some top 20 girls I've passed on seeing due to some serious research. This debate will rage well past our time.
I've met a few myself and some are great but others not so much. But I'm really not talking strictly about looks per se, but what girls are forced to do to keep those 10/10s coming. They may be insanely beautiful but the system is insanely corrupt.
-- Modified on 10/25/2014 8:18:29 AM
If I never saw anyone on my local top 100 list, I wouldn't have met many many wonderful providers, including my atf who is high up my local top 100 list, nor would I have met the only provider I've ever rated a 10/10.
But while I can understand the reasoning behind not seeing anyone on the US 100 list, I don't agree with it. It's too arbitrary.
...locally with averages of 7.9/8.8 or number 50 with 8.41/8.55. I've seen several ladies that were Top 100 and I wasn't aware of it at the time because I don't pay much attention to it. I usually check it when someone brings it up in discussion. I was very happy with the session. There are a few cases where just one thing would put a lady on my DNS list but being on the Top 100 isn't one of them. Not all the ladies are manipulators and they go on the list whether they want to or not if their scores qualify them.
edited for grammar
-- Modified on 10/25/2014 9:59:14 AM
I agree that those at the very top are suspect... But by and large I've found most of the ladies to be amazing.
but for the most part I do agree with you. I will state my reasoning.........
1. There are some providers who are giving out BBFS for their 10/10's.
2. There are some providers who are giving out extra time and services.
3. There are some providers who are coercing and manipulating and even black listing. Some of this coercion is aimed at newbie hobbyists.
4. Lets not forget the fake reviews.
5. Golden pussy syndrome. I don't need the attitude and some of the top providers think they are God's gift to the hobby. No thanks!
6. Yes, they are overpriced for the most part.
You are not the only one who avoids some of the providers on the list.
For the feminists and illiterate among us, note that I said "some" and not "all". Webster's dictionary is readily available online.
Best gal I ever saw now retired was in TER top 5. Fave current gal in top 50. She's damn near perfect. I don't do gross generalizations.
1. There are some providers who are giving out BBFS for their 10/10's.
2. There are some providers who are giving out extra time and services.
3. There are some providers who are coercing and manipulating and even black listing. Some of this coercion is aimed at newbie hobbyists.
4. Lets not forget the fake reviews.
5. Golden pussy syndrome. I don't need the attitude and some of the top providers think they are God's gift to the hobby. No thanks!
6. Yes, they are overpriced for the most part.
You are not the only one who avoids some of the providers on the list.
For the feminists and illiterate among us, note that I said "some" and not "all". Webster's dictionary is readily available online.
When I asked admin what the rules were for being on the top 100 list, I was told those rules were not ever published. So where did you see this new rule? I'm just curious.
Swim
Well I know 1 rule is 20 reviews. So there are tons of ladies with great reviews that haven't reached that magic number. Thats why its good to use the search function.
Swim
Smart people don't always need the rules in writing to figure them out.
In the case of the Top 100, written or not, the rules are a minimum of 20 reviews with the most recent one being in the past 3 months.
-- Modified on 10/25/2014 11:25:49 AM
reviews, I just wondered where he saw the 3 month rule. I guess he, or someone, looked at a shitload of them on the list and saw they all had at least one review in the last 3 months.
Swim
...the GD board (probably Atlanta). A provider said she asked TER why she wasn't on the list anymore. She reported TER told her about the three months requirement and it was new. I then checked the Atlanta list. There were many changes so I took it that she was correct. I don't check the list often, usually as I stated before I check when someone brings it up in discussion. By looking for the ladies I've seen I can note changes. When someone goes from the 90's to the 70's something big happened. A new 3 month rule sounded as good as any other reason.
Side note: there's no way I'm going to check enough reviews to verify the 3 month thing.
Side note 2: I recall a discussion sometime in the distant past about the requirement was a review in the last year and that was changed to 6 months. This came up when someone asked about providers being on the Top 100 list and hadn't had a review in 9 months or more.
Maybe perfectstorm can find these. I am rarely able to find things when I search unless I can remember who the author was. I don't have the knack for choosing the best key words/phrases I guess.
On several regional boards, the GD board, the RO board (and I bet the PO board too), and the newbie board. I'm surprised swim missed it on the newbie board.
As we all know, policies change all the time. Rarely are any of the rules in writing but it's easy enough to figure out when some change When the Top 100 first came out I think providers only needed 5 reviews, then they changed it to 20. There was no requirement for recent reviews In the beginning (and there were retired ladies on the list and ladies who asked for no new reviews once they were on there) then they changed it to 6 months a year or so ago. The change to 3 months just happened a couple weeks ago.