Physical beauty, a sensual and spirited performance by an intelligent, knowledgeable woman I would guess ought to result in a highly enjoyable session.

That said, it still doesn't mean she's going to rcck your world. That depends on a lot of other things including your willingness to have your world rocked and whether or not she's in the mood to give a damn.

There's no way to apply or develop a mathematical constant, and you will be disappointed if you try.  We humans are too complex for that...

I'm not sure how to label it. SOUL perhaps, or maybe HEART. Whatever it's called, I think it's what separates the very good providers from the great ones.  

And as was already said, beauty is in the eye of the beholder. There's external beauty. And there's inner beauty. That's where the SOUL/HEART factor comes in.

As for an equation--it's difficult if not impossible to use math to quantify a person. I save math for other things, such as calculating my hobbying budget.

"Three Hole Sally.

Given your scenario of:
(Beauty x Performance x Brains) = Constant
Then as one degrades the others must increase in regards to just one person.  If to you long hair is an element of beauty and someone you like shaves her head, does she instantly gain Performance or Brains?

If you're saying the Constant is a fixed value regardless of who is involved, then between two people of equal Beauty and equal Performance, they both have to be equally Brainy.  Real life experience is laughing so hard that one it's shooting a drink out of its nose.

Math likes rigid logic.  People are squishy and don't fit into rigid boxes, even accounting for the bondage folks.

Given the above, in my opinion the theory is not valid.

DIALOGUE minus a BRAIN equals an ASSHOLE..

Beauty - does not matter unless I want to create a pretty son. Not relevant in pfp.

 
Performance - that's important.

 
Brain - I like smart women, pfp isn't the go to medium to find one.

 
Were you looking for a numerical response to your equation?

I would offer however that the product of those three (Accepting the argument for now that they can be intelligently quantified, and that's a stretch.) would give a range of numbers which, when plotted against the population would produce a bell curve not dissimilar to that used to express IQ ranges in the general population.

In sum:  There is a small quantity of gals (and for that matter, guys) at the extremes, and a large body in the middle, which is just what anyone would expect in a large segment looking at any particular set of attributes.

Is that you will pay for beauty and performance but intelligence is what keeps you coming back for more.  Or if not intelligence, then the wisdom to know that performance must increase to keep clients as beauty fades.  Since beauty is subjective the whole idea of a constant is irrelevant.

"Your taughts, if any?"

I don't have any 'taughts' because I'm not a teacher.

oh, there's no plural in the word 'taught'

While X may always equal 7 (old SAT guessing guidlines), the magic number for beauty is 1.618 a number known to the ancient Greeks as Phi.

A 2009 recap of an older 1980's study confirms that Phi and all its permutations continues to be the leading mathematical way to assess female beauty.  In the original study, over 1000 participants were shown over 250 pictures of real female faces and asked to rate them on a scale of 1 to 100.  The results were overwhelmingly lopsided, providing researchers with prime data to extrapolate the mathematical correlation of "beauty".

Not surprisingly, from a mathematical perspective, Michelle Pfeiffer was the clear winner (remember this WAS the 80's) - something which could have also been determined by a random survey of every masturbating teenager in the Northern Hemisphere.

In the 2009 update, Pfeiffer remains on the list, with Catherine Zeta-Jones coming in a close second.

To the point of the original post, both Zeta-Jones and Pfeiffer have reported IQ's above 160.
(Funny side note - James Woods has an IQ over 180, and is in no way considered attractive by the average human).

Something tells me if you did an analysis on virtual women in online gaming, their features would correlate well with this Phi hypothesis