..... I have only come across one provider that specifically mentioned on her webpage that she doesn't see women or couples. Many providers will mention that they see couples, but very few mention single ladies, so if I see a lady that interests me I will send her an email to ask her if she entertains us ladies. I am happy to report that out of almost 30 emails that I have sent, only 2 have said no. The rest said that they would love to see women. I'd call that a great success rate 
Out of curiosity - anyone know if there are any "Reviewers" on TER that are Female ? A lot of the gal's see females as well as males-just curious !!
She was the female half of a couple I see now and then. Not sure if that counts since she didn't meet me on her own, but there ya go.
She blows that 50 Shades shit out of the water, that's for sure.
....but I choose not to write any reviews.
..... I have only come across one provider that specifically mentioned on her webpage that she doesn't see women or couples. Many providers will mention that they see couples, but very few mention single ladies, so if I see a lady that interests me I will send her an email to ask her if she entertains us ladies. I am happy to report that out of almost 30 emails that I have sent, only 2 have said no. The rest said that they would love to see women. I'd call that a great success rate
My impression of providers, based on very little personal contact, but reading through the boards, is that the percentage of providers that are bi is probably higher than the percentage of bi women in civvie life. Maybe that's just an opportunity thing.
i have a couple of reviews written by females
I met her at a meet and greet in LV in fact.
Nice person and interesting too.
1. even though, generally speaking, the male audience on TER is hostile to the idea, TER might 'allow' it. maybe.
2. It irks me that writing a review as a woman is something that, somehow, might need some kind of special consideration to determine *if* it could be allowed. Blow me.
3. regardless of the above, I would never post a review on this site (with the current review system that's in place). There is not one single fiber of my being that is 'ok' with rating a woman by numbers (which, to me, feels like rating a woman like a side of beef) or, the fact that a provider has to have performed certain "acts" in order to get a higher score. In order to give the "score" (belch) that I felt was fair, I would have no choice but to lie.
4. If you wanna know that a provider is professional, courteous, respectful, on-time, responsive, has accurate photos, how she handles communication, her general demeanor or focus, is not a ROB, would I repeat or highly recommend?...etc.....great. Sharing the 'juicy details' of a private session, with the entire world, is not my thing.
But that's just me.
...written by a woman about her session with a provider. I read it. This discussion has come up before. Someone posted a link to the review. I don't have any idea where it is but I'm sure someone can find it. Hopefully they will
In fact, technically, it's really more that some guys heads spontaneously combust at the idea of women reviewing men vs women reviewing women. But from my POV the gender of reviewer or review-ee is irrelevant.
That aside it really doesn't matter one way or the other. A review system that is rigidly based on number ratings, scores, And having to check-off certain 'acts' is a turn-off for me.
And (IMO) one should not be ”required" to write the equivalent of a penthouse forum letter to convey useful and relevant review information about a provider. If I read a review about a restaurant I want to know about the quality of the food, the atmosphere, the cleanliness, the prices. I don't need (nor do I care) about how someone felt while eating the food----or whether they ate with a fork or a spoon.
The juicy dets are, to a large degree, just spank material. Not that there's anything wrong with that...lol....But a significant part of that juicy detail is quite often.....well......more fantasy than reality. Even the number ratings themselves are highly suspect, and widely distrusted. Not to mention a source of competition for 'ratings' that has some crazy downsides.
Again....that's just me. And the system is what it is. So......
I do have a big problem with providers reviewing clients.
and you have hit on the main reason I have never written a review. If I wanted to write "penthouse forum" letters, then that's just what I would do. I am not a frustrated porn writer, nor do I really want to read such reviews, but as you said "that's just me, and the system is what it is"
Hotplants I agree completely with what you said below.
That aside it really doesn't matter one way or the other. A review system that is rigidly based on number ratings, scores, And having to check-off certain 'acts' is a turn-off for me.
And (IMO) one should not be ”required" to write the equivalent of a penthouse forum letter to convey useful and relevant review information about a provider. If I read a review about a restaurant I want to know about the quality of the food, the atmosphere, the cleanliness, the prices. I don't need (nor do I care) about how someone felt while eating the food----or whether they ate with a fork or a spoon.
She was pretty cool.. It was M&G held by one of the old organizers in DC area.. Good Ol' days.
...and I miss her presence here on the boards
She's done several reviews but not here. She's hot and smart