TER General Board

If there are "levels" to "depravity," I would think there ought to be some metric...
WickedBrut 27 Reviews 745 reads
posted

...by which to gauge those levels. If you simply say one is "worse," aren't you implying that the other is "better?"

Quales can't easily be translated into some numerical system. We tried that with the TER review scorecard. Most agree that it's very subjective and imprecise (not necessarily a bad thing in regards to reviews), others have stronger opinions about the shortcomings.

But what then is the point of such a question?

I'll grant you that it draws attention to the many variations of depravity, so as a rhetorical "statement" it is sensible.

Beyond that...what? Would any answer lead to edification?
Posted By: JohnyComeAlready
What's worse molesting a child, or molesting an animal?  
   
 Both are disgusting, but is one worse than the other? are there levels to such depravity?  
   
Posted By: WickedBrut
of asking people to compare two atrocities, asking them to opine which is "worse," and then accusing them of condoning (or advocating) the other. The thought process in this thread seems to go, "Oh! You think animal cruelty is worse than rape?! That must mean that you think rape is okay! Why, you must be..!" Or, "You consider rape to be worse than animal cruelty?! Does that mean that you gleefully beat your miniature schnauzer?!"  
     
  Maybe someone could flame out on a train that carefully explains the logic of this type of thought, or better, reveal the various logics held by sundry individuals.

I believe so, because an animal has no way of expressing consent.

The communists at the ADA, are fans of Pharell?

You've mentioned this topic a number of times,  I'm starting to really wonder if you're into animals. None of us would be surprised if you were though.  Rofl    

just don't blame it on the puppy

as a matter of fact I'm against all human to non-human sexual relations.

Posted By: Drunken Asian
You've mentioned this topic a number of times,  I'm starting to really wonder if you're into animals. None of us would be surprised if you were though.  Rofl    
   
 just don't blame it on the puppy

Vern's love for animals is second only to his love for rapists.  

Posted By: Drunken Asian
You've mentioned this topic a number of times,  I'm starting to really wonder if you're into animals. None of us would be surprised if you were though.  Rofl    
   
 just don't blame it on the puppy

You have an obsession with, wanting me to be obsessed with rape.

 
You are certifiably BSC----froot loops.

Both are damn sick way of thinking in my book. Honestly, I didn't think of either one until I read your sick post. If there is one thing I would kill a person is, if I witness a man raping a women. That will definitely push me over the edge. It is the worst crime a man can commit, period.

cuppajoe803 reads

If the mutt is already humping your leg, you can drop your pants as consent can be assumed.  

Posted By: JohnyComeAlready
I believe so, because an animal has no way of expressing consent.

I don't care if you want cream in your coffee.

I wish I'd said that!

Posted By: cuppajoe
If the mutt is already humping your leg, you can drop your pants as consent can be assumed.  
   
Posted By: JohnyComeAlready
I believe so, because an animal has no way of expressing consent.

Posted By: WickedBrut
I wish I'd said that!  
   
Posted By: cuppajoe
If the mutt is already humping your leg, you can drop your pants as consent can be assumed.    
     
Posted By: JohnyComeAlready
I believe so, because an animal has no way of expressing consent.
 
What if an adolescent male, humps the leg of a woman...

 
Who decides what consent is?

You got to be in between the legs before you start humping

JackDunphy1025 reads

Isn't that a demeaning term? Couldn't it lead to a group think mentality that looks down on mutts that may lead to violence against them?

I mean you can't draw a direct correlation between any particular mutt and the violence that may befall them but the coarsening of our language does make it more likely, does it not?

Of course words matter

poor animals can't even complain with police.  Women can....Doesn't mean that they always will, but if they stay alive and are not murdered after rape (which does happen BTW...especially in third world fucked up countries in Middle East,India etc)

Why do you ask? What are you planning?

-- Modified on 7/2/2014 1:01:05 PM

Yeah that looks like a bad accident.

... as for your question I remember when that tape aired. I forgot it was NBC till I saw the watermark.

 

No I don't go looking for this stuff, but the audience of the donkey show does. do they not?

 
Quoth the raven... Never more

GaGambler911 reads

The time to worry is when what he say actually starts making sense. That's the time to seek professional help. lol

I actually think he is a plant, put here on this board by the turdster as to steal his title of "most clueless poster"

That said, no one has surpassed Fungy for pure, unadulterated stupidity. JCA is trying to be a troll, Fungy simply can't help himself.

Your brain waves permanently late.
   
You think, not a chance.

You would only indulge in bestiality if it was considered rape.

Not getting enough, huh?  You're one sick pup (no pun intended)

Register Now!