Yes, we can have multiple O's...but, so can guys. I've had many clients who've had multiple O's (as many as three) even within an hour-long session.
That saying guys have, "There is no such thing as a bad BJ?" Women don't have an equivalent saying. Bad sex is just....bad. Even oral (being bitten/chin-sandpapered/manhandled down there is roughly equivalent, painwise, to getting kicked in the balls). And it's nearly impossible to come with an unskilled partner...unless he is willing to be taught (being taught is a huge blow to a lot of guys' egos). Guys can come a few times even with an unskilled partner. It is very unlikely that I'd even come ONE time with an unskilled partner (unless I enlisted the help of a vibrator. And, believe it or not, I've had a few clients with whom I could not come even WITH the help of a vibrator).... is sex fair ?
Yes?/No? :Should sex be fair ?
but as usual, he just comes off looking clueless and stupid.
Enigmas have a universe of our own. It's actually quite smart... At least in one sense of that word.
Turnaround is fair play.
I think that word might be more fitting for the OP
...but the more I think about it... The more I tend to agree. Something terrible must be happening to me.
-- Modified on 3/30/2014 11:06:34 AM
I were lactose intolerant.
He is always around but had better things to do. Anyway, you were adequate for the task so there's no need to say more.......at this time.
I cum 99% of the times from sex.. Women don't...even in civvie relationship.. Unless of course your's truly is on the mound. LMAO 
No...Sex should not be fair.. It should be fun..
As you keep oscillating between enigmatic and stupid, we need to smack your ass to bring you back to Planet Earth or wake you up from sleep...
From the get go, I don't believe the sexes are fair. Male is different from Female.
Curly, it would be unfair to the ladies if I were to let you "smack" my "ass".
You have fun here on Planet Earth, I 'm headed to Venus to get down with some intergalactic intercourse.
and don't hurry back
probably because he can't ever get a civvy girl to sleep with him. I'm sure he resorts to yanking his own shaft every evening. How else would it explain this dumb question.
That was his position not too long ago, wasn't it?
GaG, do you equate sex to rape?
then you give your answer.
Do you believe my position is unfair?
escort gets money
guy gets gratification. fair and square business transaction.
with a girlfriend / so, she gets to be laid every now and then
so does the guy. it is about romance so I am doubting there's a requirement to be totally fair as long as the partner wants to please the other partner and does not mind it. It's not about being fair and getting exactly 50/50% it's about wanting to be giving each other more and being completely happy about it. imo
-- Modified on 3/30/2014 11:46:38 AM
I'd have to be madly in love (and reciprocated) in order for me to do that though. A girl with a title of "girl friend", I probably won't devote 100% of myself.
I guess this is also a way for a savvy cunning girl to take everything a guy owns through alimony but fortunately I don't own much at all (under my own name, that is. lol )
Okay, not 100%, but that's sort of splitting hairs. When people say 50-50, it usually means, "I'll give back what I get," and in any encounter of a sexual nature, IMO, it's a matter of giving all (and, yeah, if you're in love 'all' means something different than it does with an escort), and hopefully receiving her all in return.
But I think we basically agree.
Suffice to say, I wouldn't be in a relationship if I'm finding myself even remotely calculating what I'm getting from her and what I'm giving. Being together and being happily would be the main goal.
I guess a girl being with a guy and making him happy can be considered a form of giving something back too but due to the huge ambiguity and the relative & non-quantitative nature of what those entail, the same couple could be in a perfectly fair relationship if both parties love each other but on the other extreme the same couple could claim to be very unfair if they just can't get along. Hence, a very dumb question. lol
That's like asking if getting the amount of sunlight we do from the sun is fair
And I'm sure you're right that this question has never been asked here before. Do you know why? Until now, no one was stupid enough to ask it.
bigpimp below
by his own admission, he was raised a bastard... seems he's just trolling now.
and all this time, I thought you were lacking discipline.
only to come back under a handle that implies pimp-sympathyzer.
original yes, a very dumb original question lol
I agree sex is not supposed to be fair. How could it
I didn't say asking an unasked question was dumb. I said your question hadn't been asked because it's dumb. Can your pea brain discern the difference?
I think this is proof just how wrong he was.
only 'dumb' answers from 'dumb' people.
And for the record, I would never personally use the word 'dumb' as any part of my definitive vocabulary. But for all intensive purposes here, to address 'those' using the word as part of their daily word choice, I thought it was important to use the word in this instance. Simply so they can understand correctly the 'question' at hand using their own ridiculous terminology.
Nowhere did "I" say "there are no dumb questions"
My post actually "implied" (Fuck you Conan) the exact opposite.
I really don't understand how an obviously "mature" woman like yourself can spend so much time here and still not be able to understand simple English. sheesh,
Or I guess the other possibility is that you are being intentionally obtuse, that couldn't be it, now could it?
Now that one I read....S L O W L Y.
LOL.
The Cunning Linguist points out that it's not "for all intensive purposes." The correct phrase is "for all intents and purposes."
So funny when you get on your high horse and then fall on your ass.
For all intensive purposes
Nonsense, it means nothing. Its what people say when they really mean to say "for all intents and purposes".
1. For all intents and purposes = Correct
2. To all intents and purposes = Correct
3. For all intensive purposes = WRONG! You should have paid attention in English class!
Sex is play, but not really a game. So fairness doesn't apply. Unless you see it as running a game. Then it can't be fair.
... is sex fair ?
You shouldn't read that far into the question.
Although, is it your goal to end up with a trophy?
Sure, as long as both parties involved are getting what they want and need out of it. Why not.
'Should' it be fair? Totally different question IMO.
Fair, no. I'm not sure sex could ever be fair.
I have not formed an explanation yet. I would start with the fact the male species, and female species are anatomically different, while being sexually compatible.
as I am curious. I think perhaps it may not be the explanation you are looking for, but perhaps you may find the question you really want to ask.
He's silly.
and most likely the nicest thing you will ever say about him
))
Truth be told, I can't even muster up that much "niceness" for him.
...Maybe you need an enima (sic) to think straight.
Does that make you happy, and in defense of my use of the non word "enima" I had misread the word "enigma" so if I am going to misread something I might as well misspell it as well.
As for Pimpathy, at one point he would bounce back and forth between stupid and enigmatic, but he is firmly in the camp of being stupid now. If you would like me to say that you were right and I was wrong. so be it. You were right, and I was wrong, Happy now?
I've only shown respect for you, out of respect for seniority
It's the most descriptive word I can think of. He's just a silly little maggot.
)) Truth be told, I can't even muster up that much "niceness" for him.
were you expecting a dick pic?
on what you mean by "fair":
used as an adjective - "in accordance with the rules or standards" - then yes.
used as an adverb - "without cheating or trying to achieve unjust advantage" - then possibly.
used as a noun - "a beautiful woman" - then hopefully so
The fairer sex definition is interesting
some sex play isn't meant to be fair in one sense, but is fair in another (some BDSM comes to mind).
If gender is the point, would you consider Girl on Girl sex unfair as well as Guy on Girl?
What about number of "players"? Is a threesome unfair for one or all? Solo... has to be fair at least, right?
So is your question about sex or something else
I thought homo vs hetero sex could go in the direction of being more fair. The more I think about that, the less i think it's true.
If gender is the point, would you consider Girl on Girl sex unfair as well as Guy on Girl?
What about number of "players"? Is a threesome unfair for one or all? Solo... has to be fair at least, right?
So is your question about sex or something else?
question you're really pondering is one about power and control. I'd say it's fair but inequitable.
It's also certainly an aspect of sex; although not the point of sex as most see it, I believe.
Although I wouldn't rule that out.
It's also certainly an aspect of sex; although not the point of sex as most see it, I believe.
'stupid' question is only stupid to those who can't answer the question for what it 'is', not for what it 'isn't'.
I have a couple of nominees for banishment there.
the ongoings of the ridiculousness spewed on this board...I'm all for it. Banish away. I have approached them on it, but nothing yet. Shucks. So I'm stuck playing here with you. However, the minute they do decide to create something of the kind, you can have your GD board and I'll take my lil self and (I'm sure a few others) capable of having a grown adult conversation on levels you can't even fathom, and mosey on outta here.
Can't come quick enough in my opinion. Maybe I'll start something.
Ya know, there would no name calling or trash talking or acting like you're in 3rd grade to be a part of that lil community. Just people who can handle a topic, no matter what topic, with opinion and a good argument, nothing more. You must act like an adult though at all times, that's the catch. So of course, you and a few others would NOT be allowed off the getgo and no trying to 'attempt' to change your handle. I'm just not sure you could 'handle' that. In fact, I know you couldn't. Post as a child, always post as a child. You might have to hold Nick's hand on that one on the way down.
-- Modified on 3/30/2014 9:45:23 AM
So here's a suggestion/dare: do a search, find a few other boards, leave here and join up. Board rules prohibit me from naming them, but they're around and easy to find. So who's stopping you? Put up or shut up.
I'll make a bet, though. Minnie won't take me up on my suggestion and do what she says she wants to do. Why? Because, deep down, she likes it here or needs to feed on the negative energy she helps spawn. Why do you think she comes back, unchanged, from every melt-down. Thus, this desire to find a more congenial place to post is just the latest in a long litany of lies.
But one can dream, can't one?
So if you go, Tardlor, you might have to hold Roddy's hand on that one on the way down. But do bring him along. Actually, don't. He's starting to make a rare sensible post. Besides, with you gone we need a good pinata here.
He's taking someone's place as the board pinata
The idiot OP is both stupid, and clueless. Once upon a time he was simply "enigmatic" but that ship sailed quite some time ago.
If there are 'other' sites, I have not found them, but then again, I haven't taken the time to search. Feel free to PM them to me whoever does know of 'good' ones. But don't be sending me off on some hoo haa of ridiculousness. Be serious about it if you're going to. But I will admit, sometimes it is too fun here to yes, poke at the pinatas, although our definition of 'who' that pinata is, is quite different for each of us.
I guess my point is, sometimes (ok alot of the time) the pinata thing is just well, 'old', like some of same ol' posters here. I know I tire of it. I don't know, I think this place needs a lil modernizing or spicing up but in a positive light in my opinion, not that that'll happen but it is just a thought. It'll get shot down like everything else, but hey, everything is worth a fair shot in my eyes. If it works, great, if it doesn't, oh well.
It boils down to 'majority reigns supreme' as with everything else in life...guess it just depends on who the majority is. Which I might add...is clearly not me haha. (But I take that as a compliment btw).
PM away people...........I'll be waitin
We could certainly do away with the pimp-sympathizing posts as well as a bunch of other enigmatic & dumb posts though.
But I will of course still leave my profile up with reviews, and ads blah blah blah...just not my 'verbiage' LOL. You guys are right, I don't belong here that way. I just honestly have no idea where to look.
-- Modified on 3/30/2014 12:25:20 PM
She whines about the board and say's she'd leave for a good alternative. Then she expects us to go find her a place she might like better, mainly, it seems, because she's too lazy or too busy to do it herself. With all the time she spends here, at a place she professes not to like, you'd think there'd be ample time to do a simple search.
Fact is, she really doesn't want to go anywhere else. She just won't admit it. Why? Who knows? Who cares?
I was referring to someone else who might consider posting less enigmatic dumb shit
Taylor rarely if ever posts anything enigmatic, dumb is a different story, but Turdwell begged me not to be "mean" to his love, he's scared she might leave us. Like that will EVER happen.
Well I guess it will happen someday, but it's not likely that it will happen anytime soon.
TSTTT means exactly that, Too Stupid To Talk To, any deeper meaning to that is purely a figment of your imagination.
and no, you are NOT stuck her with me, you are free to leave any time you want to, as you have done several times before. Don't worry, we all know you aren't going anywhere, and even if you do, like a moth to a flame, you will be back.
I just don't read your shit, that's all. Headlines only, honest. Perhaps that's why my replys make no sense to you....your words are like white space to me and don't exist. I swear to god. Perhaps thats why my replies puzzle you and few other posters here, cause I don't read the same ol' stuff you guys post day in and day out. I already know what you're going to say, yes, you're that predictable and unoriginal.
When I respond it's to your headlines only 99.9% of the time, that's all that's really needed anyway. Let me repeat, I never read what you write. So sometimes it's on and sometimes it's off. It's fun to keep you guessing. Now if you wrote something interesting or something minus the crap, I'd pay attention. But you don't. Sorry.
How bout this...come up with something not so predictable and something that speaks originality, and we can have a real conversation. Sounds good to me.
Let me know so I'm sure to read it next time.
but you still must have a problem when you can't even get the headline correct.
and everybody here knows you're lying when you claim not to read my or Inicky's posts. Truth be told, you seem to hang on every word.
listen, I said 99.9% of the time, UNLESS you catch my attention with something worth reading (which as of late, hasn't been anything 'new'). I know you want to claim I read them, but I really don't. What would I really gain, ask yourself that question if you were me.
It doesn't matter....anyhow just listen to this one request will ya..........
If you just stop and think about what this person is really asking, the OP...this is a very interesting topic. Just stop for a minute, put all your immediate attack bashing aside and look at what was posted, not the poster or the wording, just the question. I bet if you looked at it from my perspective, the real question at hand, you may just get something out of it instead of all these distractions at poking at people. I will read your posts and would like to hear your real answers to his question, IF you keep the other crap out of it.
I'm being totally serious. I have nothing against any of 'you' just your repetitive slandering that has nothing to do with the 'question' ever at hand, only the 'posters' at hand. We can talk then, which I would love to do with you like I do with many others here.
Read the question boys, and simply answer 'the question'.......tis interesting indeed if you 'allow' it to be. That's all. Then we can 'talk'.
The OP, meaning the poster is simply a troll, and the OP meaning the question is so ambiguously worded as to be a completely meaningless question.
Now if you would like to rephrase the question into something actually worth discussing I will be more than happy to take the question seriously. In it's present form, it's simply one of those ridiculous and ambiguous questions like "what's the meaning of life?" which for all practical purposes in not really a "question" at all.
I am being sincere, If you would like to start a new thread with a legitimate question posed to the board, I will take it seriously, This thread is a joke and not worth taking seriously, virtually anything you would post would be an improvement
question would've been certainly a topic to discuss in all seriousness. No, I'm not going to start a new thread. But since I read this post, very well put, thank you...so see, I am capable of reading and comprehending when 'I' want to.
Anyway, I'll tell you what, how about this instead. You find me a 'boring' forum where 'I' belong and I'll leave you people be to go about your ways. Swear to God. Not trying to change anybody, just trying to find out where I fit in somewhere 'posting' wise. During the midst of my downtime I like to know the ongoings and thought processes of this world now that I am here...helps me hone in my craft (nice huh). And obviously, it doesn't have to happen here on TER posting wise. I am/was simply unaware of any other forums that work like this in this world but on a more serious level. I am still rather 'new' here, remember?
Find me another decent forum where I can chat with like-minded folk and I post elsewhere. Obviously, I like to write and I like to hear what people have to say. It's that simple. Just as long as it's an easy forum like this. Someone did put me on a different one last year he thought was suited more to my tastes and it was just weird and confusing so I bailed immediately and ended up back on here. Forgot the name of it.
Find me a new forum....I stop posting on TER. Simple. So help me GAG...the games can be over then and you and I can go on our silly separate ways.
-- Modified on 3/30/2014 12:12:31 PM
Well except for my tongue and cheek suggestion for a "TER" TSTTT board.
First off, I can't link or even refer to a competing site here, even if I wanted to.
Secondly, I don't believe I've ever suggested that you leave. I have suggested (ok more than suggested) that you are BSC, but I've only made fun of you and your outbursts, and your stomping off in a huff only to return in a few days, but I don't ever remember me suggesting you leave in a serious way. Just like I have never told your BF that he should leave.
If you or your BF were to leave you would only be replaced by someone like you, just like if I were to leave, some other asshole would step right into my place. This is a site with tens of thousand of members logged onto it morning, noon, and night. None of us are irreplaceable, and on that note I HAVE said if you don't like it here don't let the door hit you on the ass, but that's a far cry from actually trying to get rid of you.
If you want a "nice" board, why don't you simply stay on the Newbie board, everyone is "nice" there, even me.
think there was anything else out there. The newbie board is completely different and not what i'm after, clearly. Have someone who isn't 'afraid' to email me LOL, email me some sites. That's all.
Btw, saw BSC and skimmed this post from you. Didn't read it word for word, saw 'nice' and 'newbie' that was it. I'm sorry, I'm just not interested in being called anything other than my name at this rate. That's no different than verbal abuse at it's worst. I'm not interested in abuse or I would've stayed married LOL.
Let me know. Ciao
Or I suppose Tardlor accomplishes the same thing, which would you prefer?
and your name is not "Taylor" any more than my name is "GaGambler"
I would also mention that is being called BSC by some asshole on the internet is the worst kind of verbal abuse you can think of, you have led a rather sheltered life.
I assumed all TSTTT post would get bounced back to GD, where they belong.
It should be great, or at least very good...
...Unless it's free, then I'd probably settle for fair - still beats sitting on the couch watching TV (well, usually, depending what's on - great Seinfeld re-run, NCAA tourney, decisions, decisions...).
(sorry, silly question, silly reply).
"Of fairest creatures we desire increase,
That therefore beauty's rose may never die..." WS, Sonnet 1
The 16th, 17th Century meaning of that held a slightly racist overtone.
Just saying...
I meant that I like sex AT a fair, specifically a renaissance fair.
Lots of wenches at those things.
And of course, when it comes to sex, I'm an equal opportunity pervert.
of course, I can't recall ever attending a renaissance fair.
WB, the "fairer" sex refers to white pussy?
While the number is less than what would be representative of the general population, it is not zero. Renaissance fairs do have a certain selection effect that skews the statistics. Folks of any race might need an interest in European history.
I would think people from northern africa, would have migrated to the italian peninsula. "When" IDK
I used to play Dungeons & Dragons (back in the late 80's) in college with a genuine worshipper of Odin who just happened to be African American. He went to Ren Faire's all the time with his GF and they both dressed up in some cool retro Rennaissance costumes. He belonged to a group of Odin worshippers who were sick of the whole Judeo-Christian-Muslim People of the Book kind of stuff. They resurrected ancient worship of the Norse gods as a rebellion against society and being placed in a "box" as a statistic.
as to a Renaissance fair. Other than cleavage and turkey legs.
Fisher, and WB brought up race. I simply asked, "is sex fair ?". What say you
Really?
-- Modified on 3/30/2014 9:34:14 PM
Chauvinistic as well. Historically it's never been considered crude till the last few decades. About the same time that "swarthy" made the list of derogatory expressions.
figuratively and literally. It's harder for a guy not to get off, than a girl...the girl can be completely passive, and the sex act can still be completed. Which I guess isn't fair to her...if he gets his, SHE should get hers
But at least with our species, both parties at least have the ability to enjoy sex equally.
Think of how it would feel to be a female cat, or a male praying mantis.....CHOMP!
Yes, we can have multiple O's...but, so can guys. I've had many clients who've had multiple O's (as many as three) even within an hour-long session.
That saying guys have, "There is no such thing as a bad BJ?"
Women don't have an equivalent saying. Bad sex is just....bad. Even oral (being bitten/chin-sandpapered/manhandled down there is roughly equivalent, painwise, to getting kicked in the balls). And it's nearly impossible to come with an unskilled partner...unless he is willing to be taught (being taught is a huge blow to a lot of guys' egos).
Guys can come a few times even with an unskilled partner. It is very unlikely that I'd even come ONE time with an unskilled partner (unless I enlisted the help of a vibrator. And, believe it or not, I've had a few clients with whom I could not come even WITH the help of a vibrator).
Especially with a wrapper.
An O is an O, but honestly, the woman is feeling MUCH more building up to that than I am during sex with a wrapper.
And yes, there IS such a thing as a bad BJ for me.
Can definitely lose my erection if she is doing a poor job (and can be painful too).
It can be very hard for me to cum just from being fucked. Many women need external stimulation of the clitoris. So I am not necessarily feeling it any more than the guy losing his erection in a wrapper. If I am not warmed up, lubed up, or aroused...even sometimes if I am...it can hurt. Or it can feel like absolutely nothing. Being fucked does not always feel good....not by a long shot.
No matter how bad a BJ is...I would venture to say that it doesn't feel like getting kicked in the nuts. Pretty common with an unskilled partner for it to get THAT unpleasant for the woman (can be said for both oral and vaginal sex).
-- Modified on 3/31/2014 3:25:38 AM
this is all subjective stuff, to some degree, isn't it?
I base my notion of a woman's feeling more with a wrapper purely on my own experience with women, and their reactions to me.
Trust me on this one - now whether it is all enjoyment or something else, that I can't say.
Honestly, sex with a wrapper only gives me about 40% of the feeling of sex without one.
Thus, it can take me a long time to get to the O.
I really get more pure pleasure from other tactile input such as feeling the softness of a woman's breast with my hands, than I get from my penis during intercourse during much of the act before the O.
I'd agree with your statement "no bad..." if you applied it to vaginal sex without a wrapper.
And that makes sense too when you think about it, the warm softness of a vagina is the perfect home for a cock - they were designed for each other - and the right pressure is generally applied in the right areas.
HJs and BJs can be great - but bad technique can indeed have me in pain and pushing the lady away.
This has happened to me. I'll grant you, it's not quite as bad as being kicked in the balls, but it's bad.
The tip of my penis is extremely sensitive, so the ladies technique is critical for me. Too much attention to the tip is quite painful.
But hey, if the larger point is that it is MORE predictable and mechanical to get a guy to O, I'll certainly agree with this. But I do think it's not quite as 100% purely mechanical as some might think...
Not sure where I said it was mechanical for the guy to pop, but from my experience with men and their reactions to me, yes, it is 1000 times (or more) easier for them to enjoy themselves and cum during sex, as opposed to me. Condoms or lack thereof are irrelevant to that assessment.
The other point being: a lot of people think that getting fucked always just feels good for a woman....that is NOT true. I cannot even come from pure fucking and no other help ( which is fairly common for women...the clitoris is on the outside). And it can either hurt really badly, or leave me 100% indifferent. I would venture to say (wouldnt want to presume) that is NOT the same experience that most men have.
Not sure what point of mine you are even arguing with. I guess it is not nice to hear that we can be completely indifferent and even turned off during an encounter...some men have seen just seem to think that ANY object...dildo, finger, dick, broom handle (kidding) jammed into me repeatedly will feel good...but it just doesn't work that way.
On a side note, condoms suck for us, too...cause a lot of chafing.
-- Modified on 3/31/2014 7:43:37 AM
Women only fake orgasm, and men, at least TER men, come many times an hour. True.
This is a nonsensical question because rhythm doesn't apply to money.
Fairness applies to contests, a fair game, a fair fight, a fair bargain. Somebody wins, or both can win, or whatever.
Unless you view sex as a contest, fairness doesn't apply.
That's why people sense it's an odd or "stupid" question.
It better be more than fair...
Yes?/No? :Should sex be fair ?
I won't ask: "Where is the G spot?"
Which raises the question: are you actually retarded, or just profoundly dense? I guess that's a classic "distinction without a difference."
turd-blossom is certainly one of Rod's nicknames.
-- Modified on 3/31/2014 12:58:37 AM
People would think and act completely different......
Sex makes the world go around. people do crazy things for sex and money. That's why they go hand and hand
For the record I love sex and I love money. Therefore the answer to your question is "YES sex is completely fair". I'm speaking for men and woman when I say this: how could the feeling of a really intense orgasm Not be fair? But at the same time passion, lust and excitement play a major role for me....teasing and pleasing is so fun .... cumming is just the cherry on top
I'm sure glad you pathetic prostitution sympathizers had sumpin to bitch about today hehe
Sex has bcum a weapon for sum, if not a tool altogether. If the world would cease n its attempts to "get a leg up over another", it would b a much nicer place. Back to both hands on the wheel buwahahaha
"Sex has bcum a weapon for sum, if not a tool altogether. If the world would cease n its attempts to "get a leg up over another", it would b a much nicer place."
No sex is not fair. Why can a woman cum multiple times without break while a guy has to recharge? Why do women haveto bear children while men just hang out and smoke a cigar? (All generalities with biological reasons) nothing is fair. Fair is a made up concept. Sex is not fair because life is not fair. There is no referee. No one to tell you you are doing well or doing poor except your friends and/or family, who may or may not have a objective/subjective take on life. This is a dumb question. Some men are born and grow up handsome, good looking and successful, never have a problem getting laid while his twin brother can't get laid to save his life. Is that fair? Most women can get laid simply by saying "yes" to any jerk that comes along, most guys get shot down just for asking and rarely get asked. Is that fair? Between culture, propriety, physicality, psychology and simple opportunity, there is NO FAIR in anything. Ugh. Next topic. Enough already.
50/50 anything will always lead to someone coming short, or someone not giving what they can.
Just enjoy it, and enjoy each other. It doesn't have to be that complicated.
Depends on who's sex we're talking about.
Not all sex is equal because not all participants are equal.
One round of sex with person A & B, may not the same as person C & D,
or A & C
or A & D
or B & C
or B & D
Without tryin to be redundant, I am sure you get my point.
Is sex with my clients fair?
I believe so.
I don't ass rape them, they don't ass rape me.
Now enter in the SO who do not enjoy it, I am sure for the other SO, it isn't fair.
But you want a definitive answer upon a subject/topic that is subjective?
That's about like wanting an honest answer from a deceptive person....
(line poorly quoted from thread past week...)
Your question in itself shows a lack of intelligence & logic.
Maybe you should keep the pimping to the streets, bruh
I'm not going to ask a question that can be answered easily, or answered at all.
Where's the fun in that?
Not all sex is equal because not all participants are equal.
One round of sex with person A & B, may not the same as person C & D,
or A & C
or A & D
or B & C
or B & D
Without tryin to be redundant, I am sure you get my point.
Is sex with my clients fair?
I believe so.
I don't ass rape them, they don't ass rape me.
Now enter in the SO who do not enjoy it, I am sure for the other SO, it isn't fair.
But you want a definitive answer upon a subject/topic that is subjective?
That's about like wanting an honest answer from a deceptive person....
(line poorly quoted from thread past week...)
Your question in itself shows a lack of intelligence & logic.
Maybe you should keep the pimping to the streets, bruh.
After all what would be the fun in actually making sense?
The only thing surprising is just how many people play along with your nonsensical bullshit. Most of what you say sounds like if came out of a fortune cookie.
LMAO I knew his source of barnum nonsense sounded familiar. He must like chinese takeout.
Your posts are neither meaningful, entertaining, or helpful contributions.
As labeled by TER guidelines.
You Sir, have no point.
You are a waste of air, and I want my ticket money back.