I for one am tired of old provider pics. Come on, you girls, you post on the ad board but your picture is 3-4 years old. I searched. I could go back 999 days ( max allowed) and I have found the same damn photo you used almost 3 years ago that you used this week.
Really? And if you say your a dancer, athlete, hard body, model ( whatever) at least have the body to pull it off. For example, I saw a pic of a lean athletic body on the ad board and she is at least 15 - 20 pound more and doesn't have the abs or cuts she used too. When is it time to update your pics? Not throwing anyone under the bus, but come on. You know who you are....He's got a valid point. I'm not sure which ads he's talking about, but in general you hope that what you see in the ad looks like the girl in person. Not always the case because of airbrushing, old pics, etc. Another reason reviews are important. But even those need to be calibrated a bit....is an 8 really an 8 or something different.
Clearly he has a beef with a particular lady and he's trying to affect her business. It's rather obvious, too bad you can't see that. Anyone who says 'I'm not trying to throw anyone under the bus BUT...' Is trying to do just that. Simple reverse psychology. Nothing sophisticated and very obvious to anyone who's had a basic psychology course or naturally good common sense.
Ladies often turn down appointments with gents for a variety of reasons but they don't announce why. Or worse, they have an awful experience with a client here and then warn other ladies about him via the Providers Only board. Since that thing leaks like no one's business, supposed 'good guys' try to help out but undercutting a girl with indirect comments.
If WestCoastWayBack, who's written tons of reviews and is often a white knight for ladies he's seen and debunks B&S ads, had actual proof that a lady advertising is overweight and using old photos he would say who he was talking about. But if he did that a bunch of guys would defend that said lady because he is in fact not telling the truth and has never met the highly rated lady he's referring to.
It's just a case of bros before hoes and he's going on false information. Just send this supposed trusted source a PM and ask who he's referring to and if he's met her or reviewed her (he hasn't done either as she's not interested). Then PM her recent reviewers. You'll get the real story.
-- Modified on 4/26/2014 6:49:27 AM
Ditto.
The OP's point is valid but it is an ultimately futile rant about a too common problem. Unless you are writing a review, there is nothing to be gained by starting a thread to make accusations about someone who you haven't seen. That would only result in a useless back and forth that would focus not on the truthiness of the pics but on the motive of the poster. Let someone else stir up the drama
But I can think of a lot of touring providers and local girls have use the same old photo's for years. I am not looking to single out anyone. I could have posted this under an alias but I didn't.
Suggestion to anyone who cares. Do your research and see for yourself