I do not have any personal experience with her, save one time a few years ago when I sent her an email. She responded after a few days and I politely explained to her that I had made other arrangements with a gal who responded promptly. She then unloaded on me, literally going ballistic for not calling instead of emailing, lol.
I can also tell you that she has been advertising as 39 or 40 for over a decade and those pics have been in circulation for at least 6 years. She certainly looks attractive enough, but....
She is advertising on Eros. An attractive mature provider from Lancaster. She doesn't allow reviews. A previous name she used was Chanel, Any information on her? Thanks
She also goes by Julie. Coy about her rate on her Lancaster website. http://www.blondelancasterescort.com/
I do not have any personal experience with her, save one time a few years ago when I sent her an email. She responded after a few days and I politely explained to her that I had made other arrangements with a gal who responded promptly. She then unloaded on me, literally going ballistic for not calling instead of emailing, lol.
I can also tell you that she has been advertising as 39 or 40 for over a decade and those pics have been in circulation for at least 6 years. She certainly looks attractive enough, but....
I met her in the spring of 2006, and at that time she and I were roughly the same age... so she is pushing 60 at this point... met her in Lancaster, she picked me up at the Park City Mall and drove me to her very nice and upscale garden apartment in the city itself... drove a very nice caddy... the apartment itself if very well appointed and multilevel... is a bit of an eccentric with a great deal of costume clothing and eclectic furnishings... the sex was unremarkable, tended to just lay there and let things happen, not much animation at all..
She doesnt "ALLOW" reviews??? Begs the questions:
1 - Why not? What has she got to hide?
2 - how does she ENFORCE not "allowing" reviews? Can a provider have reviews removed? Kinda negates the whole REASON for having reviews, no?