I know, I called someone last year who was "verfified" and nothing close... infact, I was so POed that I now do not trust any pic on SDX.
Here is an example: Check out the hot babe Lexxa, who has a "verfified" under her pic. This is a stock pic and there is no way in hell SDX verified her!!!
Incall usually means independant but the photo looks like a stock one. Number doesn't turn up on a search.
Anyone seen her?
dude listen iv'e seen at least four diffrent pics for the same number at sd exotics. i called about three days ago and got the distinct feeling it was an agency. look under angelina and see the same number. now call and i bet who ever u ask for will answer the phone.
Notice that the photo is not verified by SDE. Being verified doesn't guarantee a good time (note that Austin is verified), but not being verified is not a good sign.
Being verified has nothing to do at all with whether or not there's a good time to be had. It's just saying that SDX staff has seen the advertiser and that the picture is real. Thus, Austin is verified (that's really her).
thought about it then checked her number... I think that it is a service...as I called for amanda later and was same #.
it's the same chick under julia and shelly.......plus the same number is given for about three other pics at sd xotics. stay away as all the tell tell signs are there!
I know, I called someone last year who was "verfified" and nothing close... infact, I was so POed that I now do not trust any pic on SDX.
Here is an example: Check out the hot babe Lexxa, who has a "verfified" under her pic. This is a stock pic and there is no way in hell SDX verified her!!!
Possibly the "hot" chick in the photo is a real person who fronts for the not-so-real "escort". This is giving SDX the benefit of the doubt, which may or may not be warranted. After all, SDX keeps listing Austin & Bridgette & Skye as escorts, with no doubt many complaints from their customers.
Go to NaughtyEscort.com - They are anti-ripoff.