oy, you really missed an opportunity here. you could have said "yeah, sure i'd like to fuck Sara Silvermann senseless. Her and her kind have been doing that to me for decades. and it really hurt."
well, back to the vegatative state. Hey, if you get a chance, check out natalie portman.
Reports "Retailing Chains Caught in a Wave of Bankruptcies"
Everybody knows that bad news doesn't exist if nobody reports it, and all this is going to do is make people save money just when we're trying to get them to buy more Chinese stuff.
This is just one more pinko libbie treason, and one more reason to execute all liberals. It's those fucking swarthy folks ganging up on us again.
I agree with your sentiment.
I would call it treason as well if it weren't for the fact that the people who own the NY Times (the Sulzberger's) are only US citizens because they were born here. Their loyalties are paid to their tribe,and they choose to screw America through their actions. And to be sure they have screwed America, pushing for destructive policies,one right after the other for decades,lying,distorting,and managing the news with their tribe's interests in mind.
The Times is also chaired by Russell T. Lewis who is also the president and CEO. Micheal Golden,additionally is vice chair and Martin Nisenholtz runs their internet wing. And all three ,like like Sulzberger's, will be celebrating Passover soon.
Just some information to consider.
-- Modified on 4/15/2008 9:47:08 AM
look what the cat dragged in.
so much angst over the truth and facts.
Whenever details of who controls the media are not given, instead a blanket (an essentially correct) claim of Zionist media control is given, many on this board sneer. Then when specifics are given many times all that can be retorted by those who won't consider the facts are cheap attempts at character assasination.
There is a certain weakness though that can easily be seen in these types of responses. There really is nothing you can counter the argument with that is not a lie or cheapshot is there??
-- Modified on 4/15/2008 11:29:58 AM
because I've got my hands full with enough shiksa anyway.
I think that's what's going on here, is that you can't break it to your mom that you really want to fuck Sarah Silverman.
Yeah well if Sarah Silverman is the hottest example you can think of then I can assure you that the desire is not there on this end to get any of them in bed. The only opinion I would have of her would be that she is just another degenerate comic that practices in "humor" based on bodily functions which is not appealing to me in the least. There was a time in this country when nobody thought any of that was funny, and well that's before the media was taken over by Zionists. Others are entitled to their preferences but I assure you Jimmy Kimmel has nothing to be worried about as far as hiding her from me is concerned...NOT HOT.
Comedy Central is currently pondering changing its name to Kosher Central. Seriously they didn't need to create that Jewish TV network they started a year or so ago. Jon Stewart, Corbert,Lewis Black,et-al ...Sheeeseh
Not interested in any conversation about race that is based around physical appearance but I will make a statement of fact. Its funny how all the people (women and men included) that I,before I started looking into the Zionist control over world affairs a few years ago and really never factored them into anything whatsoever, used to just think were ugly white people were, well, yeah you know where I am going.
There are alot of things that jews can rightfully brag about being superior at, but is physical appearence really one of them???
Lisa Bloom is the only jewish woman that I can think of, and I am trying to think here, who I would say is even remotely attractive, and she really doesn't have the typical look does she.
Again I think basing any meaningful argument about race or Zionism on physical appearence is abhorrent but you prompted me to comment with the notion that I would "want to fuck as many of them as I want".
-- Modified on 4/15/2008 12:30:15 PM
oy, you really missed an opportunity here. you could have said "yeah, sure i'd like to fuck Sara Silvermann senseless. Her and her kind have been doing that to me for decades. and it really hurt."
well, back to the vegatative state. Hey, if you get a chance, check out natalie portman.
Gotta love Mr. Begin a few days ago and now Mr. Sharon at least being clear about things. Zionists haven't been "fucking me for decades" , try the whole world. As much as you would like to think so, my grievences go far beyond my personal experiances and status in life,place in the world,et-al. I am actually happy with my personal situation,all the way around, and pretty much always have. Then again I am concerned with more than just myself. I am concerned about others, and about the future, which is certainbly bleak should the West continue down the path it is now.
Seriously though, what the hell ever became of Sharon, that was the damndest thing how he just kinda disappeared from the news after he went into a coma.
slow that you can't figure out GOOGLE!! I'd say they were doing you a favor by fucking you, taking a big chance on retarded offspring, eh?
http://www.israel-celebrity-source.com/coppermine/index.php
Say, do you suppose DocG has any sisters???
Yeah thats what I forgot to do today, do a google search on "hot jewish women".
Please.
on behalf of former PM Sharon, let me inforn you that he's doing as well as any massively obese terrorist/war criminal can do in a persistent vegatative state.
the Palestinians can breathe a sigh of relief, as they will no longer be subject to his unwanted attention and tender mercies, and the Americans can rest assured that their national interests will no longer be continually assulted and battered into submission at his pudgy and bloodthirsty hands. but, there was no problem finding an equally qualified candidate to step immediately into his capaciou striple EEE shoes without missing a beat
on behalf of the former PM, allow me to thank you for you interest and your kind words. it is a very welcome change from the 100s of "Get Well Never" cards we received on a daily basis, all bearing postmarks from the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. Probably from some wildly ungrateful displaced Palestinian types.
-- Modified on 4/16/2008 4:07:53 AM
Yeah so is his family going to trademark "The Butcher of Beirut" so money can be made off of T-shirt sales in the future???....lol
We are already well on the way to doing just that, my anti-Semetic goyim [really, is there any other type?] friend. Proceeds, which are expected to be immense, will all go to charity. Needless to say, we will be quite selective in our disbursements, and the following are clearly never going to be recipients of our philantrropic largesse :
Amnesty International
Human Rights Watch
The Catholic Near-East Relief Association
Association of Arab-American University Graduates
Council of American-islamic Relations
The USS Libert Memorial Fund
UN Works and Relief Administration
and others, no doubt many others, to be named later as they come to our attention and piss us off.
Shalom
-- Modified on 4/16/2008 4:09:52 AM
Kinda off the original subject right????
it's OK, you can be the forum straight man.
you still haven't the foggiest notion of what a "fact" means, yet you accuse everyone else of not using facts and ignoring your "facts".
quote:
Not interested in any conversation about race that is based around physical appearance but
*I will make a statement of fact.*
Its funny how all the people (women and men included) that I,before I started looking into the Zionist control over world affairs a few years ago and really never factored them into anything whatsoever, used to just think were ugly white people were, well, yeah you know where I am going.
-----------------
Not only do you contradict yourself, as per your norm, with what you are supposedly not interested in and then go on for two paragraphs about it anyway, (and not make much sense in the process, also your norm) but where is the so-called "statement of fact?" Yet again, another dumb-ass conjecture that you trot out as being a fact.
And by the way, you still owe me $100. Obviously it would be much better spent on purchasing yourself a good dictionary. See if you can get your mommy to drive you to the book store.
Can't even remember what I owe you $100 for but if you will do me the pleasure of reading my response to your comment down the board a bit, the Ann Coulter one, you will then see that I believe I am going to need need that $100 to hire private security to protect myself.
As I wrote on that below message. I think I have a stalker and his name is zisk.
Dumbass, the meaning of "statement of fact" was meant to convey what I saw and thought with regard to all of these jews that I thought before were just ugly white people.
Like I mentioned in the post in the thread below, hearing the parroting of what your TV and authority figures have told you to say to people like me is quite pedestrian.
"Dumbass, the meaning of "statement of fact" was meant to convey what I saw and thought"
--exactly, so its NOT a statement of fact at all, now is it? Maybe we can all chip in and buy a dictionary for you since you incorrectly use the term 'fact' in almost all your posts where you claim your statements are based on fact, when they are not. I've corrected you before and you stubbornly refuse to learn. Not surprising at all.
"Can't even remember what I owe you $100 for"
--not surprising you block out the nonsense of your own posts. Do a search. You claimed I was using Joe Goebbels as an alias to further mock you (as if no one else here recognizes your ignorance) and bet $100 it was true. Doing a simple search you could see that whoever was using that alias was posting for months before I ever joined here.
"As I wrote on that below message. I think I have a stalker and his name is zisk."
--I had to search for that one. Are you referring to your posting a reply to me in a thread that had been DORMANT for two days? There's a mirror behind you; turn around and look into it next time you call someone a stalker. Why respond to a dead thread?
-- Modified on 4/15/2008 6:52:39 PM
Ok so let me get this straight, YOU know what I used to see on TV and in the news. YOU know what I thought better than I do. I refuse to explain this again you moron. IT IS A STATEMENT OF FACT that,soon after I started to read and learn about the Zionist role in the fall of the West that I then started to realize that all of these commentators,"experts",etc, on TV and running the show, some of which I just thought were ugly people who were white...were indeed jews...
Is that clear enough for you, goddamnit I know your the only one that didnt understand what I meant the first 2 times.
There is no proof that your not Joe Goebbles,I am inclined to believe that that is a distinct possibility. And I do have a stalker.
you are trying to make sense of one of tallslim's posts
If it walks acts and looks like a duck then, ____.
I always assumed so just by looking at him. It can be compared to that movie "They Live" where when Roddy Piper puts on those glasses he can see aliens who appear to be regualr citizens to the naked eye. I have developed a knack for idenifying on sight,and I am rarely wrong,I used to be guarded when making assumptions but I am about 95% correct and that is when I am just watching TV surfing net, without names or knowing what their story is. Jon Stewart,who I believe is, gave him his break as well.
That would be one that would genuinely surprise me if he isn't,always thought he was. Regardless he is another destructive lefty, of course lefties and Zionists are not one and the same.
Mr Colbert is unabashingly and proudly Roman Catholic and takes great pains to let you know that at times.
Ya know, actual knowledge of stuff that you spout off about is a great replacement for your usual hobbies, like pissing upwind.
I really have no desire to watch anything on that filthy degenerate network (and yeah I am saying that as a hobbyist,the last time I ever laid eyes on that network was when Mystery Science Theater 3000 was on there) so I wouldn't know much of what he utters beyond a few things that came out of his mouth on that daily show. He is just another shill (jew or not) that pokes fun at events in the world that have the upmost importance.
With that said, if he is Roman Catholic then I stand corrected,serves me right for assuming,damn the fact that I am usually right, getting too cocky on that front perhaps.
You really should remove those fish hooks from your asshole sometimes, it might improve your disposition. I'm just saying.
a little less angst.
not that I got any direct knowledge, there may be a reason, or several, why X is so content being a RC-basher when he's not busy being a skeptical voice about israel?