where some fat ass homely bitch is getting 8's and 9's on looks. some of these reviewers definitely need glasses.
-- Modified on 2/22/2008 7:54:07 AM
I would generally applaud this behavior, but he has a hot and supportive wife. It would not surprise me to learn she doesn't wear panties most of the time. She is that good looking and non-abrasive. So I have trouble siding with a person that fucks around on some primo MILF poontang. Seems wrong to me on many different levels. Please help me support this man's cheating.
He's not fucking around on someone like Hilary, so its hard to justify IMHO.
Bar(eb)ack would not do this.
Cheating on his wife might not be so bad but if he did and he lies about it he is finished.
If McCain is lying then he is an idiot after what happened to Clinton for lying about Monica. They all should have learned from Nixon’s experience that the cover up is worse than the deed itself. I also doubt the NY Times would print such a story if their sources were not credible; especially after what happened to Rather.
Nothing happened to Rather. he should have been run out of town on a rail.
Did you even read the article? what a hatchet job. As was pointed out earlier, now that he looks like the de facto Republican nominee, his honeymoon with the press is over. Just watch, it will be free rein on McCain by the "mainstream" media until the GE is over.
and tired of any particular piece of poon, however prime it may be.
We think that there should be dispensation for people to fuck around a bit, as long as they use good judgment. Meaning that (1) nobody, not even Republicans (as they are indeed nobodies), will go looking in windows, answering spam rumors, or subpoenaing skivvy drawers. (2) Spouses are entitled to a little equal run-around time. (3) The govt will commit to total eradication of all STDs, and quarantine and/or exclude all infected persons. This rubber shit is way too much trouble and unromantic. (4) If you get caught, have the class to have a little panache. No skanks unless you are a Republican, and nothing under 16. (5) Don't ask, and don't tell.
Of course, I sure wouldn't mind porking McCain's wife!!
any woman would look good.
(1) you can show me the hottest woman on the planet, and I'll show you a husband who is tired of her; and (2) EVERY woman is going to get fucked by somebody sooner or later, on a dare if nothing else.
where some fat ass homely bitch is getting 8's and 9's on looks. some of these reviewers definitely need glasses.
-- Modified on 2/22/2008 7:54:07 AM
I mean, I'm nothing to look at, but I *AM* paying the bills, and I *will* be nice to those who are nice to me, especially if they have a good hand job.
What many reviewers need, and we both know it, is not glasses, but a dose of objectivity. I really wonder what the average review score is.
In my observation, hot bods are much easier to find among young women than any skill or finesse.
And as a nation, we have let our physical fitness go right down the tube. I'm not exception, but I rate - I'm a fucking plank owner. I was present at the creation.
second wife after he cheated on his first wife with his current one?
ask if anybody here thinks it's a stretch for any man to stick his dick in any woman.
Oh, yeah, we have some Republicans here who never do it, but that's only because they can't get it up anyway.
That & the fact that their noses are growing into the next county.
Yes, for the R's on here...because the bastion of liberalism and lying, the NY Times, said so.
Just read the damn story. The Times didn't make any allegations that McCain was cheating on wife #2 just like he did wife #1. It was the McCain campaign staffers who had that concern.
msking such a BFD out of it. I don't realy give a fuck. Why do you? If this is the biggest scandal that you and the rest of the liberal media can come up with to disparage McCain, then you guys are in for a long hard road come the GE.
I'm not, you're missing the point. The story wasn't about fucking it was about McCain's habitual lying and hypocrisy. In fact, he did again in his denial of the NY Times story.
In the response put out by the campaign, McCain denied one of the claims in the story and said he never had contact with lobbyists or employees from Paxson Communications which was trying to win a favorable ruling from the FCC and pressured the PCC on his own initiative.
But that denial is contradicted by McCain's own sworn testimony from 2002 regarding that same incident:
"I was contacted by Mr. [Lowell] Paxson on this issue. He wanted their approval very bad for purposes of his business. I believe that Mr. Paxson had a legitimate complaint."
So the question is was McCain lying then or is he lying now and what else did lie about in his response to the article?
that you claim to despise. If I am to believe you, then am I to also believe that you go along with the righties that say "It wasn't about the Blowjob, it was about lying to Congress and the American people"?
But I believe a man should only cheat on ugly and annoying women. Its not fair to penalize a woman's good looks and behavior with a guy's whore mongering. I use the term "whore" only because we are talking about a lobbyist here.