This message applies mainly to FBSM providers although all are welcome to comment. A few of the FBSM providers I have seen in San Diego and many more in Los Angeles are willing to do privates to privates massage. When I receive this I really enjoy it, but at the same time get very apprehensive because I am worried about catching a disease. Don't providers worry about ctaching something and passing it on as well? Would it be uncalled for to ask to wear a condom for this type of service out of an abundence of caution even though you aren't expecting or asking for FS? Any FBSM providers who are open to this can feel free to message me...
If that is a simulated cowgirl thing, I've done that frequently on clients to completion but when I'm sitting on them, my genitals are actually pressed against his lower abdomen and his genitals are pressed against my buttocks and back. Usually I wear a tiny g-string when doing this as well just to make it even safer.
No, I don't ever worry about catching a disease. The way I do it, it would be highly unlikely. Surely, my sitting bareass on the average public toilet seat is more dangerous than sitting on the average man's belly.
One of the attractions of this type of pseudo-penetration is that it can be done bareback. I have never encountered anyone who wanted to wear a condom for what basically amounts to a creative handjob but I'm sure if you wanted to wear a condom I can't see why any fbsm provider would object.
Now, as for "privates to privates" you may be talking about something else entirely. Is this sort of a dry humping thing?
-- Modified on 7/14/2002 10:12:46 PM
It has a small likelyhood of missing and actually having penetration. or pre-seminal fluids,
I am a TS FBMS provider, so it may be different.