Pelosi to Pissofski... that was a bit of a reach.
Let's try for something more easily recognizeable... although, I guess there is a cohesive argument to be made for Bushitski...
or Shrillary.... or Hucksterwannabee... how about Shmancy Spilloosely ? Whattya think?
My first instinct is to always root against Hillary. Her arrogance, sense of entitlement, insincerity, duplicity, and personification of the Clinton White House will always make me dread her. But she is far more moderate than Obama or Edwards. Her policies would probably be much more tolerable to conservatives than Edwards' class warfare and Obama's empty rhetoric. I should prefer her to the others but I just can't stand her.
-- Modified on 1/4/2008 6:07:12 AM
Because it would allow them to really and truly unite completely in an all out war to destroy Clinton once and for all...
Who cares if they ruin America while they're at it? The ultra elite who made their fortunes during the Bush crime era will still have all their monies, and they will laugh at the rank and file GOP puppets who pay all the bills.
Leaving those of us who care about our country to clean up the mess.
What a sickeningly, self righteous post.
You're not a rank & file Democrat?? You vote for the party that HATES Israel.
I've not been associated with any political party for almost 30 years. I ended my asssociation with the JDL in 1971 when Rubin, Manning and the Krueger brothers decided to make violence the vehicle of choice for their message.
I ended my association with the California Democratic Party after McGovern won the CA primaries, and almost all my former associates working for Hubert Humphrey were offered well-paying positions in the NIXON camp. I simply couldn't wrap my head around that, and focused instead on student politics at the state level.
Just because I recognize and loudly protest the loathsomeness of the GOP and its current leadership does not mean I subscribe to the odious flaccidity of the Democratic Party.
Remember, I'm the guy that wants to gut the entire government.
And now, while I read your contempt loud and clear (a predictable response so commonplace in this forum), I also take note you did not bother to contradict a single sentence of mine, choosing to crucify the messenger instead in a transparent attempt to shift dialog away from the subject matter.
Also a predictable response in this forum. But lets move on to more important things. You can hate me later. It will be more fashionable if you amplify someone elses anti-Doc sentiments.
I don't hate you. I made a post about the three top Dems and which may me be the less of the three evils (through my perspective) and you go on an anti-Bush rant and talk about how people like you who love love the country will have to fix it (as opposed to evil Republicans). That was a lot to stomach in a couple of sentences. I don't know what I was supposed to "contradict" from your statement.
See here's the thing... I've given up all the kool aid, 420, everything, and am trying to go totally on the natch... which requires snatch... which requires more scratch than i have available to me and so i have to take it out somewhere, so i figured i may as well go on a typical anti bush rant for the hell of it.
i'm still dealing with increased irritability,
fortunately, there is an abundance of sex looking on my horizon.... so what the hell...
i still think Bush is an evil and impeachable son of a bitch. And I think Dick Cheney is really Grandmaster Cash disguised as Satan. Whooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
(yes, I really AM quite sober)
I'm up for it.
Put me in coach. I know the plays.
My flight leaves in 24 hours
-- Modified on 1/5/2008 10:47:26 AM
Doc, When I read that I thought you were probably referring to Edwards, Kerry, Kennedy, Soreass, Pissoffski, etc., these were the sorry bastards that came to my mind, but maybe you didn't mean them. I don't know if they are elite, but they sure are an arrogant gaggle.
Well, I was actually referring to the Bush's and Cheney's and Halliburton/KBR/Fleur/Bechtel corporate heads etc etc... but its tough to deny some of those folks you mentioned probably fall in the same category. Except for Kerry. He married into money and since his flip flop is still having trouble playing ketchup with the rest of the wanna-be's.
BTW - I figured out who you meant by Soreass, thats easy. Pissofski? Help me out here, I'm just a dumb Doc.
Doc, I was referring to Nancy Girl aka Speaker. I usually call Kerry the MustardMan. You are right, he married a pickle, pretty smart fellow for sure.
Pelosi to Pissofski... that was a bit of a reach.
Let's try for something more easily recognizeable... although, I guess there is a cohesive argument to be made for Bushitski...
or Shrillary.... or Hucksterwannabee... how about Shmancy Spilloosely ? Whattya think?
Ignore her pant suits, forget that she is a woman and take solice that she is a bought & paid for tool of the corporate oligarchy. Her voting record and major campaign donors speak far louder than her Democrat lapel pin.
Of all the presidential candidates, Hillary would be the cheapest to put into the office. When sworn in, she and Bill could bring back all that shit they stole from the White House when they left the last time.
All we need is another Candidate promising to change Washington. Isn't it what Dubya promised. Yeah, Dubya changed it alright!
Have anything to tell me?
Geez, this getting oooooolllllllld.......