Well, one of the options under CIM is "no, but facial" you could set it to that and run a search. Is that what you were talking about, Fisher?
That may leave out a lot of ladies who swallow (or spit) but would be willing to do COF, since we don't have that check all that apply thingy that gets kicked around every now and again over on S&P. Aside from reading a lot of reviews, an ISO may be a good route. I'd post it on the local board too though.ISO providers in the south east that are into COF or cum play. Travel a lot in the area and looking for a new friend to have fun with. Please respond or email me with any suggestions.
If yes then I couldn't find it on the database while is search mode...where would I find that?
Well, one of the options under CIM is "no, but facial" you could set it to that and run a search. Is that what you were talking about, Fisher?
That may leave out a lot of ladies who swallow (or spit) but would be willing to do COF, since we don't have that check all that apply thingy that gets kicked around every now and again over on S&P.
Aside from reading a lot of reviews, an ISO may be a good route. I'd post it on the local board too though.
I'm late to this thread. Although you can search "cum in mouth - no, but facial" (COF) you will not get all of those that DO like COF and cum play but are Profiled as "cum in mouth - Yes" spit, swallow or both.
I think most reviewers rank swallow > spit > no - but facial > not at all, so swallow trumps COF and you will miss those.
However, many who take CIM - YES do not like COF because it ruins their make-up or you might miss and mess up their hair, etc.
This is why TER has to update the database and review form to allow us to "check all that apply" and permit better searching.
Something like:
CIM - check all that apply
( ) no
( ) facial
( ) cob (cum on body)
( ) cum play
( ) yes, spit
( ) yes, swallow
to make it possible to port the old dbase to a new system, but maybe a preferable form would be
Finish location - check all that apply
( ) in the condom only
( ) on reviewer
( ) face
( ) body (ass cheeks, breasts, back)
( ) mouth, spit
( ) mouth, swallow
( ) cum swap
( ) cum play
( ) ceiling (she was that good!)
( ) put it in a jar to take home with h
I suggested this on Suggestion and Policy, too, but the actual Profile should display useful info in the form of numbers or histograms.
The review form would look like this:
CIM - check all that apply
( ) no
( ) facial
( ) cob (cum on body)
( ) cum play
( ) yes, spit
( ) yes, swallow
but the Profile would display info like this:
CIM
0 no
1 facial
2 cob (cum on body)
0 cum play
8 yes, spit
4 yes, swallow
or
CIM
no
facial =
cob (cum on body) ==
cum play
yes, spit ========
yes, swallow ====
That data would be from a minimum of 8 reviewers (the largest number of Xs). It could one reviewer getting off 3 times (swallow, spit, COB) and another guy reporting one huge squirt as facial and COB, and so on. Basically, it would reduce YMMV to a reasonable expectation. 15 swallow + 1 spit looks like a sure swallow. 7 swallow + 11 spit looks reasonable. 1 swallow + 15 spit looks like an accident!
HAPPY SWALLOWDAYS
LMAO! If she takes it home with her, I hope she doesn't have your real name or number or address!
Besides when I travel occasionally, you can find me in New Orleans. I also enjoy visiting other cities in the Southeast.