Thanks for the "thanks", you are indeed welcome. Keep your snout high in the air like a "good" demo, pseudo-lib-arrogant and you will keep bumping into the wall. After some time you may figure it out and lower your snout and avoid some obstacles. I am always ready to assist in snout orientation; a good swift, firm kick in the ass seems to help some of you some of the time. You too could become a convert to reality.
We all know that all Republicans are hypocrites any time they miss church on Sunday. Let's look at Nancy Pelosi and the biggest threat to our world: GLOBAL WARMING. She doesn't give a shit about it. It's another political issue to use and nothing else. She refuses to allow the House to vote on raising MPG standards in automobiles. Al Gore is crying on his chartered jet right now. DEMOCRATS ONLY CARE ABOUT THEIR OWN POWER AND NOTHING ELSE. THEY ARE EMPTY AND HOLLOW AND USE THE TRULY STUPID TO GET THEIR WAY.
"Pelosi's talk of a "green" U.S. Capitol is especially phony when she refuses to allow the House of Representatives to vote on proposals to increase fuel-economy standards for vehicles. Higher mpg standards -- the average fuel economy of new cars, trucks and SUVs has not risen since 1988 -- are a million times more important to preventing artificial global warming than symbolic actions such as those being taken at the Capitol. Stricter mileage rules would not only reduce U.S. payments to Persian Gulf dictatorships but also make a significant dent in greenhouse gases because greenhouse emissions are proportional to fossil fuel burned. Yet while Pelosi announces lofty promises about a renewable Capitol, she won't schedule a vote on the strict new mileage standards backed by figures as diverse as President Bush and Barack Obama. (In the Senate, anything goes, but in the House, the Speaker has ironclad control over what comes to the floor.) Pelosi appears to want to prevent progress against petroleum waste so that Democrats can bash Republicans in 2008 by saying nothing has been done about automotive mileage. Wouldn't it be nice if the Speaker of the House were more concerned about the country than about political posturing!"
-- Modified on 11/14/2007 10:15:38 AM
Nancy PissOffSki and FatAlbertGore. Put them both in a gunny bag and you would have a sack full of pure shit. Their existence defines hypocricy.
As long as there are brainless automatons like you around it doesn't matter if the opposition is a hypocrite or a statesman - you'll support criminals and traitors and the 'anything but them' vote will allow low-end opposition to walk away with the vote.
Thanks a lot.
-- Modified on 11/15/2007 7:02:06 AM
-- Modified on 11/15/2007 7:02:36 AM
Thanks for the "thanks", you are indeed welcome. Keep your snout high in the air like a "good" demo, pseudo-lib-arrogant and you will keep bumping into the wall. After some time you may figure it out and lower your snout and avoid some obstacles. I am always ready to assist in snout orientation; a good swift, firm kick in the ass seems to help some of you some of the time. You too could become a convert to reality.
I love it when my ideas so inflame the neocon chickenhawks that they single me out. It is amazing that all they can come up with are bumper sticker slogans and 'clever' put-downs. Here's a reality check, 'harry' - they don't work nearly as well as ideas, thoughts, alternate solutions. But you knew that, didn't you? It's mentioned in the Rove handbook. Too bad he ran out of ideas too, that kind of leaves all of you up the ol creek.
Remember all this next year, and in the meantime allow me to quote your hero Lord Cheney: go fuck your self. Seriously.
seems to be another of your bad habits. In spite of what you may have learned from other pseudo-libs, it is not a virtue. I haven't seen a "Rove handbook" but maybe you should read it again and see if there is anything you can comprehend. I suggest you start bending exercises so that you can get a firm grip on your ankles for the much needed snout realignment.
We respond with "Bumper Sticker Slogans"? Your brilliant retort to my post was "So What? Republicans are bad!". You're a moron who blindly follows a party that spits in the face of everything you believe in. I would call you a sheep, but sheep don't have a choice. You're the worst kind of idiot. You actually believe you're intelligent as you make a fool of yourself on a daily basis. Keep up the brilliant, thought-proviking replies.
Remember, your party will betray everything you believe in and you will go on blindly defending them.
I responded with "As long as there are brainless automatons like you around it doesn't matter if the opposition is a hypocrite or a statesman - you'll support criminals and traitors and the 'anything but them' vote will allow low-end opposition to walk away with the vote."
You're an idiot if that simply translates to 'Republicans are bad'.
Oh wait - you must have been criticizing harryj for his inciteful post where he said:
"Nancy PissOffSki and FatAlbertGore. Put them both in a gunny bag and you would have a sack full of pure shit. Their existence defines hypocricy."
Or is that the sort of cerebral rhetoric you support?
-- Modified on 11/15/2007 1:51:23 PM
You must have fallen for the Internet Inventor's "Inconvenient Lie". The biggest threat to our world is Islamic Facism. As former speaker Gingrich put it at a meeting I attended today we are "sleepwalking into a nightmare."
These people want to procure nuclear weapons and detonate them inside our country. We are in as much denial about this fact as the world was in 1935 with regard to hitler!
-- Modified on 11/15/2007 7:48:38 PM
If we just sit on our ass, wring our hands, whine, display incredible arrogance, and pledge blind allegiance to the hypocrit pseudo-libs everything will just be fine and dandy. That's Puck Chamberlain's take on the whole thing.
it ain't healthy. Spend a little more time on pussy, you'll start thinking more clearly.