Isn't it interesting that almost every time an out of town provider is arriving the following week a review shows up on the Boston new reviews page. It's also amazing that that review is always fantastic. Hmmmmm? I wonder how a review from another city ends up on the Boston page.
I'm not sure of your point. You wrote:
"...an out of town provider is arriving the following week a review shows up on the Boston new reviews page."
What's wrong with a review showing up in the Boston section a week after the lady arrives in Boston? If the review beats her to Boston...now that's suspicious. 
thirsty
-- Modified on 1/10/2003 10:24:51 AM
I think that may have been what he was getting at is that the review shows up before the provider does. He is saying that the provider is showing up in a week and the review all of sudden pops up the week before they are coming. I have noticed this personally nor am I positive that this is what he was getting at. Just my take. If true, then this would be odd.
I think what he meant was : one week before provider arrives, out of nowhere "puff" a review with an A++. which to me seems kind of suspicious.
Why, then was my last review of Michelle, whom I saw here in Boston...put in the Miami board??
For example: I have been reviewed in Boston, and the same review shows up as "New" in New York because NYC is listed as my "other city." I have noticed the same happening visa versa.
Perhaps this is the case with this particular lady?
Hugs, Kate xo
(most likely a stored procedure) placed a review of the lady in the newly reviewed list of the corresponding city in the profile. This created problem for traveling ladies who visited many cities, especially for ladies from South Florida.
Since the implicit rule of TER is one profile for one lady, sometimes a submit review of a lady (e.g. from Miami) visiting one city (e.g. LA) will not show up in the newly reviewed list of that city (LA). It will show up in the Miami list instead.
Michelle traveled to DC, Boston, Chicago in Dec alone. I guess staff decided not to list any particular city in the Other City field.
there could also be sincere efforts at play.
I haven't done this yet, but if I see a provider coming to town that I've seen, yet there are limited to no reviews, I may share my experience.
I noticed this recently too, the review was 'new', but the review was based on an encounter from 2 months ago.
I didn't see this as suspicious, but rather someone wanting to share a great experience.
Just dropping some change on the table....
I'd fall into this category myself. There is a real cutie coming here next week in fact from Montreal. I saw her last time she was here. I don't see any reviews of her. If I posted one now it seems it would be suspicious but the reality is she is absloutely wonderful. I'm already booked for a 4 hour date and wish I had time for more.
you can email me if you like. [email protected]
Sorry for the confusion. I meant that the review shows up 1 week before the provider arrives. It happens all the time.
i got that. what i'm saying is that i was recently tempted to post a review 1 week before a montreal provider arrived based on my last experience with her, which i didn't write a review about. considering people might find this suspicious i won't write the review. my point is that there is more than one reason these reviews might surface just before a provider arrives.