Not sure what you are talking about. I checked your profile and the last review you had turned down was submitted on 4/6/2001. (over a year ago) and it was turned down for being too old. Please email me at [email protected].
-- Staff
I had a review posted last week, and today I saw it was pulled based on not enough details. The provider asked me to to get explicit, so I did not. That is not acceptable??
.........on my review of Kayla. the only thing that upset me, was that I have seen several reviews that were far less explicit than the one that I had provided. "...we did it in all positions. she was great. A must see." Even I wrote more than that. I guess that it may depend upon the staff member reading the review. Oh well.
My understanding is that the reviews are supposed to help you decide if a provider is worth seeing. Plus, full access is free if you submit a minimum number of reviews. Add the recent complaint about self promotional reviews and bogus reviews, you can see where this is heading.
I know some of the ladies are gunshy about reviews, and don't want too much detail, however........it's a choice they need to make.
TER wants explicit detail for the stated reasons, if you are going to submit a review-it should be detailed. If a provider feels uncomfortable about the level of detail, then don't submit a review.
If you want access to the full detail area, and can't post reviews, then pay for the subscription. Or, you violate the desires of the provider and post a detailed review anyway.
Gumby, I checked you reviews and the review of "Kayla/Jennifer" was approved. If you have questions about reviews, please email [email protected]
-- Staff
Not sure what you are talking about. I checked your profile and the last review you had turned down was submitted on 4/6/2001. (over a year ago) and it was turned down for being too old. Please email me at [email protected].
-- Staff