This is the link to the lady I was trying to get reviewed. I haven't tried to verify the reliability of Cheetah and ChiTownPimp, but they have a long list of reviews and seem to agree with my assessment.
Hi Jazz,
I've got 20 reviews and am on the Reviewer Board. I submitted a review for a new lady, and it was unapproved because of:
"From time to time TER chooses not to post reviews from users with limited history for providers with no other reviews. Once the provider receives more reviews your review can be resubmitted for approval."
WTF???
Any thoughts on how I can get the review approved?
Thanks.
Moderators have absolutely nothing to do with the review process. Ok, you are on the Reviewer Board. Does anyone actually go there, what does that mean? As far as TER's comments to you, I must say there have been many a time I have been critical of the review process, but this time I will stand up and applaud them. Go back and look at your last couple of reviews for ladies where you were the first and only reviewer, I mean WTF dude? Take Candie you reviewed in Jan, a perfect '10' in performance. You set up the profile page as CBJ but claim BBJ in review, you say you kissed, but admit in the body of your review that she advertises 'Sorry guys, no kissing' you say really bi, but no mention of any such thing in review, don't know about CIM or anal. Have you EVER read the guidlines for rating a provider? Her being a '10' is only a fantasy in your own mind. But then again, one month you had 3 once in a lifetime experiences, lucky you! And there is Peanut, another lady you gave her first review in Jan. You clearly state in the review that her service was 'I forgot it was a service', but the profile page you rated an 8 - went the extra mile..which is it? On profile page you say multiple pops, but in your review only one. Your entire review cosisted of 4 sentences, one being that you felt you were there for her more than she was for you. Who was paying who?
Sorry dude, but you want to come on here whining and being critical of TER for not approving yet another review of a lady with no reviews...from you? Maybe you should go back and read the guidlines for ratings. But forget TER, if I were a provider I would damm sure want someone else writing my first review...just my 2 cents.
> Ok, you are on the Reviewer Board.
> Does anyone actually go there,
Yes guys go there. Not a really active board, but it gets a few new threads each week. It is a nice place to discuss stuff that would end up as a train wreck on the public boards.
> what does that mean?
It means I have 10 or more reviews, and have been approved to be on that board.
> ... Her [Candie] being a '10' is only a
> fantasy in your own mind
TER will downgrade the review if she doesn't do at least 3 out of 5 things. So, she doesn't have to do Anal. The text of the review is what happened. The Services Offered is what she is willing to do (regardless of whether in happend in the date or not).
I fill out the Services Offered (for her, or any other lady) based upon what I know she is willing to do with most guys. Once one guy reviews a lady, it is hard to change the profile.
I tried to explain in paragraph #5 that she is willing to go beyond the minimums if she likes you. The inconsistantcy between the Text and the Services Offered is so that guys don't think they are entitled to BBBJ.
I've seen a few ladies where BBBJ, and some other things, are at her discretion. How would you propose that YMMV stuff be listed?
> And there is Peanut ... "I forgot it was a service"
With all your reviews, I am kind of surprised that this was an issue for you. There are times when you can have great sex, and you know she is just doing it because you are paying her. And, then there are times when she really enjoys sex, and getting paid is a bonus to her. That is the context of the "I forgot it was a service" comment. With Peanut, it was like being with a lady you pick up at a bar, and she wants to have sex with you. However, it was not "mind blowing" to justify a 9 rating. The sex itself was an 8, but her attitude (which TER doesn't rate) is a 9 "I forgot it was a service".
> On profile page you say multiple pops,
> but in your review only one ...
Again, this is a difference between "services offered", and "services used". Is that a hard concept? If the first reviewer could only list services used, profiles would have a lot of No's.
This is the link to the lady I was trying to get reviewed. I haven't tried to verify the reliability of Cheetah and ChiTownPimp, but they have a long list of reviews and seem to agree with my assessment.
There is enough drama on the boards, the last thing we need is a pissing contest on the newbie board!!!
This is a question for the S&P board! I have nothing to do with approving reviews, and can't even post a review since I became a mod.
As has been noted on MANY boards, it seems to be harder and harder to get a review posted. Enforcement standards appear to be rising, and not all policy changes are formally announced, unfortunately.
As always, you are so correct.