when GFE didn't mean unsafe sex...or STD risk...think wiht your big heads guys..please! behind the scenes we are getting a lot of pressure from a group of guys in our city seeking BBFS...it is amazing on what use to be taboo is now expected..and what is currently taboo.being touted in our market as "to each his own" in only a course of months...
I think that for most members, BBBJTC/CIM (spit or swallow) is far better than just BBBJ with no CIM. I think that most would agree that providers who go the extra mile and drink from the cup should be rewarded for having done so.
I also think that it is a shame that the Asian providers, who typically offer TUMA, do not receive credit for being willing to go there. Perhaps this should be counted as "anal" as another member suggested and awarded an extra point as well.
I suggest that the TER staff conduct a poll to determine whether the members would like these activities to be awarded 1 point each going forward.
I agree 150%; but I have an additional suggestion....why not deduct a point if a bj is not offered at all (covered or not)?
Agreed. If I do not get a CBJ, the girl will probably get a 4 rating. Even with CBJ, the best she can hope for is 6-7. BBBJ is usually my minimum requirement for a 7.
when GFE didn't mean unsafe sex...or STD risk...think wiht your big heads guys..please! behind the scenes we are getting a lot of pressure from a group of guys in our city seeking BBFS...it is amazing on what use to be taboo is now expected..and what is currently taboo.being touted in our market as "to each his own" in only a course of months...
i never see a lady if she offers BBFS.....i am only asking for bbbjtc or bbbjtccim........obviously there's a huge difference between bbbjtccim and bbfs......and i NEVER , EVER expect a lady to perform bbfs......and if she only offers bbfs......then i leave the encounter altogether.....
thanks