To begin with, she told be it's a fake, but as I pointed out, there are several other things that point to this being a fake review beyond the claims of that service. His obvious lack of knowledge about the rate structure in Seattle where he claims he is from, a first time handle with no reviews passing screening. That he has no history of a single post on any of the Seattle boards. That his identical post was deleted on that other board where Rebecca is a verified provider and could challenge it as a fake.
Apparently she and others will need to do the same here.-- Modified on 12/2/2014 11:04:19 AM
f you have not seen it , I would like to draw your attention to a review posted today (12/1) by SeattlePlayer. If there ever a review that bears the hallmarks of a fake or vindictive review than this is it look no further. http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/showReview.asp?Review=1635213
The reviewer SeattlePlayer has on other reviews . He claims to be visiting from Seattle but anyone who knows a single thing about the K-doll scene in LA knows without screening you can't get an appointment with a K-doll. To pass the screening you need local references . How did SeattlePlayer secure his appointment .
No out of towner with no reviews to his name is likely to see one of the top K-dolls in LA. He may have had dreams or fantasies about Rebecca and then decided to write his review. But I doubt he saw her unless
the handle SeattlePlayer was created by someone whose predatory intentions were rebuffed by Rebecca and in retaliation he is writing this review. There are precedents and they were dealt with accordingly:
http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/showReview.asp?Review=1263133
http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/showReview.asp?Review=1284871
Successful K-dolls aren't in the habit of going beyond or needing to negotiate additional $$ for adding to the menu. They generate enough income with their standard menu an errors bill or two doesn't amount to much , Those who do offer more than the standard menu , as was the case with Audrey , would post it or make it known set a rate for it.
Another plausible theory explaining the timing of this review worth considering is the possibility of SeattlePlayer being one of the outcast users or proxies of the site known for its fraud , fake , stolen and plagiarized reviews out to retaliate against TER for permitting the exposé of their corrupt practices by proving that even on TER it is possible to post a fake review .
I have to say I was taken back that this review by a first timer got through on TER .
http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/showReview.asp?Review=163521
You have this exactly right. I belong to the K girl scene in Seattle and have never seen this handle in my life. I've know Rebecca for 2 years and have never seen a review either on TER or our local board claiming she offers these services. She has told me personally she does not over these services ever.
I also find it odd that in his review, he states:
"I can see why she is so popular and how she was able to command such a high rate while she worked in Seattle. "
The rate in Seattle is $300/hr and everyone here knows that. He only thinks it's a high rate because he is from LA and incorrectly believes $250 is the going rate in Seattle also, so assume her $300/hr in Seattle is a "higher rate" He is not even familiar enough with the Seattle scene to know our pricing structure, yet he claims to be from Seattle where he has never written a review or has any record of seeing a local K girl before coming to LA and booking with one of the most popular K girls in LA who just happens to offer him a set of services no one else has ever seen.
I call BS.
It seems undeniable this review is fake. An almost identical fake review was recently posted on that other site and was quickly deleted by admin. within a day or two.
Thankfully, TER had a very credible review process. I have no doubt they will also re-evaluate this review and make things right by deleting it.
-- Modified on 12/2/2014 1:07:50 AM
+1. I spoke with Rebecca about this and it definitely is a fake or vengeful review. She is a great provider but bbfs and anal have never been nor will they ever be a part of her menu. Most who have seen her know that she does not need to offer these expanded menu items to get her high scores for service. So those who go in expecting these items will be disappointed.
If you have not seen it , I would like to draw your attention to a review posted today (12/1) by SeattlePlayer. If there ever a review that bears the hallmarks of a fake or vindictive review than this is it look no further. http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/showReview.asp?Review=1635213
The reviewer SeattlePlayer has on other reviews . He claims to be visiting from Seattle but anyone who knows a single thing about the K-doll scene in LA knows without screening you can't get an appointment with a K-doll. To pass the screening you need local references . How did SeattlePlayer secure his appointment .
No out of towner with no reviews to his name is likely to see one of the top K-dolls in LA. He may have had dreams or fantasies about Rebecca and then decided to write his review. But I doubt he saw her unless
the handle SeattlePlayer was created by someone whose predatory intentions were rebuffed by Rebecca and in retaliation he is writing this review. There are precedents and they were dealt with accordingly:
http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/showReview.asp?Review=1263133
http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/showReview.asp?Review=1284871
Successful K-dolls aren't in the habit of going beyond or needing to negotiate additional $$ for adding to the menu. They generate enough income with their standard menu an errors bill or two doesn't amount to much , Those who do offer more than the standard menu , as was the case with Audrey , would post it or make it known set a rate for it.
Another plausible theory explaining the timing of this review worth considering is the possibility of SeattlePlayer being one of the outcast users or proxies of the site known for its fraud , fake , stolen and plagiarized reviews out to retaliate against TER for permitting the exposé of their corrupt practices by proving that even on TER it is possible to post a fake review .
I have to say I was taken back that this review by a first timer got through on TER .
http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/showReview.asp?Review=1635213
Again, she dosen't do bareback and Greek, and here another pieces saying she does. Also notice he knows the slang for down here like WLA. For a guy visiting on a businuess trip, he know what the slang terms for area is.
You weren't there, I wasn't there so how would anyone know? Nobody knows what goes on behind close doors. Only Seattle Guy and Rebecca knows what happened for sure. So guess all you want. He may have caught her at "the right time" or offered her something extra and she bit. Or maybe the review is BS...I just not assume anything and have this roll off my shoulders, it's no big thing.
To begin with, she told be it's a fake, but as I pointed out, there are several other things that point to this being a fake review beyond the claims of that service. His obvious lack of knowledge about the rate structure in Seattle where he claims he is from, a first time handle with no reviews passing screening. That he has no history of a single post on any of the Seattle boards. That his identical post was deleted on that other board where Rebecca is a verified provider and could challenge it as a fake.
Apparently she and others will need to do the same here.
-- Modified on 12/2/2014 11:04:19 AM
Just posted on TER
http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/showReview.asp?Review=1635311
It appears someone is making an effort to corrupt the TER review database by claiming these k girls who have been around for years and never ever offered BBFS as there years of reviews will show have suddenly offered it to first time reviewers/clients within a a few days of each other. Once again, it's the guys very first review here too.
There seems to be a pattern here lending credibility to the claim that this is a malicious attack by a reviewer at that other site to prove that TER is just as susceptible to fake reviews as that other site is. So far, he seem to be right.
I'm not that familiar with TER rules on this. Is there some specific number of fake reviews like this (all first time posters claiming they are getting BBFS from girls who have no history of offering that) before they will challenge them, or do they allow guys to claim whatever he wants and leave it to the girl to challenge?
-- Modified on 12/2/2014 9:31:56 AM
This has got to be the same guy that has been slandering the girls elsewhere. I would assume TER has a way to check IP addresses and block this a-hole from continuing to create one time use handles for this purpose?
Is there a possibility that this guy is just LE? what if he is just baiting folks into arguments so that they slip and say too much? Probably using a strategy of divide and conquer
But it's not impossible for one individual to have a number of TER handles and use different devices (lap tops, smart phones and iPads) to write fake reviews.
charlatans be hid the septic tanks or their proxies ( the earl kid , asnlvr9, turnupredator, vanilla lice, booboy) retaliating against TER for permitting the expose of the the other sites corrupt practices.
These revelations are costing the septic tank reviews and users and hurting them were it matters.
By posting a barrage of fake reviews they are attempting to prove TER is no better at screening their reviews than the septic tank. The other site are known for hacking the compition and engaging in cyber terrorism in their failed attempt to destroy the blog . Considering the source these reviews won't impact the KDs reputation or business. I would expect more to come to little effect .
If you have not seen it , I would like to draw your attention to a review posted today (12/1) by SeattlePlayer. If there ever a review that bears the hallmarks of a fake or vindictive review than this is it look no further. http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/showReview.asp?Review=1635213
The reviewer SeattlePlayer has on other reviews . He claims to be visiting from Seattle but anyone who knows a single thing about the K-doll scene in LA knows without screening you can't get an appointment with a K-doll. To pass the screening you need local references . How did SeattlePlayer secure his appointment .
No out of towner with no reviews to his name is likely to see one of the top K-dolls in LA. He may have had dreams or fantasies about Rebecca and then decided to write his review. But I doubt he saw her unless
the handle SeattlePlayer was created by someone whose predatory intentions were rebuffed by Rebecca and in retaliation he is writing this review. There are precedents and they were dealt with accordingly:
http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/showReview.asp?Review=1263133
http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/showReview.asp?Review=1284871
Successful K-dolls aren't in the habit of going beyond or needing to negotiate additional $$ for adding to the menu. They generate enough income with their standard menu an errors bill or two doesn't amount to much , Those who do offer more than the standard menu , as was the case with Audrey , would post it or make it known set a rate for it.
Another plausible theory explaining the timing of this review worth considering is the possibility of SeattlePlayer being one of the outcast users or proxies of the site known for its fraud , fake , stolen and plagiarized reviews out to retaliate against TER for permitting the exposé of their corrupt practices by proving that even on TER it is possible to post a fake review .
I have to say I was taken back that this review by a first timer got through on TER .
http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/showReview.asp?Review=1635213
Why do you blame all of these sites when you are the ones writing the fake reviews?
so in retaliation you posted fake reviews that even your pay masters, the charlatans in the septic , could swallow or keep up after you were exposed as a liar , predators, pervert , a rapists who tries to blackmail women into submitting to your sadistic desires , by not one but two providers who were strong enough to kick your foreign ass out of their apartment .
You are used to bullying newly arrived KDs who are vulnerable , far away from home and can't speak English into submission o you predatory practices but in Rebetella you met two KDs who were more than you can deal with . They were not impressed or intimidated by the tricks you use on oppressed females in you home land .
In case you forgot here is Rebecca's response to your false reviews of her . You thought because it was deleted you can crawl out of the septic tank but nothing is deleted other than you.
"Krebecca
Verified Provider
Join Date
Aug 2014
Posts / Replies
1
He ( Turnupforwhat ) predator try unsafe act with me. I tell him no and threaten bad review. I earnest hard working girl. I want safe kind customer.
Last edited by Krebecca; October 4th, 2014 at 04:24 PM PDT."
a K G board was created. So you all can keep your vitriol and drama from contaminating the LA board. Please move your drama over there.
The thread is important for more that just that.
Fake reviews hurt all involved, the provider, future clients, and the site as a whole for numerous reasons.
Because of this and it happened in LA, it makes perfect sense that it would be posted here.
I must be really bored this evening to respond to this...
1) This account was probably created to hurt Rebecca's business. I agree with you that this is probably a troll.
2) Two things that legit VIP customers do not discuss in a public forum is the offering of anal or BBFS. That's discretionary between the girl and the customer. This is very uncool if the reviewer is legit, which he probably isn't.
3) In the 30 or so years I've been playing with K-gals, if they like you, you've seen them enough times, or the money is right, or if you have value to them professionally, you will get better service. BBFS is more common than you think, anal is rare, but you get the right gal in the right mood, it will be served up. But at the end of the day, again, IMO, this is not something to be discussed in a public forum.
4) My network is ancient, but if two of the top 5 bookers in the state still take my calls, I'm probably still doing something right-or did at one point. I also have a high enough level on what I refer to as the North Korea of Hooker Boards, that helps greatly, although one idiot agency wouldn't give me access (to this genius, if you're reading, take a good look at my network-the accounts may be dead, but the people behind them, all of whom you know, are still around). Let's say this was a legit account posting that review. If he networks it right, he can get in without screening.
4a) I must say, I find it hilarious that the former Park Asian owner has trouble getting appointments. This is the guy who made the apartment girl biz in CA what it is today. They should be offering him freebies. Man, times change.
5) IDK who is running the site that Rebecca of Seoulbrook Farm is advertising on, but I find them amusing. There's only, what , 4, 5, Hall of Fame K-gals in my reviews, but that didn't give me enough cred with them. Very un-Confucious of them not to respect their elders lol.
6) Sometimes, it's better to discuss this internally. Since I'm going to speculate that many review readers speak EN as a second language and are going by certain buzz words used in posting reviews, it's not that much of a surprise that the review got through. In this case, you be a good citizen and discuss your concerns with Adminstration.