Yes I know I purposely mis-spelled genes. This man's perspective on north american woman. Pitts and legs shaved. If you want to edge the kitty ok. A fur kitty is normal. It's woman.
Little girls are bare. That's not sexy 'cause it's a little pervy. Understand about Brazilian down there WRT hygiene, but a woman has a muff, and it's sexy.
So there was this late night show I saw from the 80's called MagnumPI. That guy was fuzzy and I think they picked him for that show 'cause the ladies thought he was hot.
A lot of male underwear models in media are bare, but I think it's to - not draw attention away from the clothing. (that's what they are trying to sell).
I have also experienced a sense that Providers visuals should display engorged breasts(implants). That suggests current and post pregnancy conditions. Nope... real breasts of any size are part of her whole package to stimulate / arouse her desire to coitis.
Sexy and aroused are states of mind.
Being attractive to the other is a thought process in which both participate.
http://www.buzzfeed.com/mjs538/dear-men-no-more-manscaping?bffb
Ladies, your opinions, please?
http://www.buzzfeed.com/mjs538/dear-men-no-more-manscaping?bffb
"Bird not make nest in bare tree"
With that said it should be remembered that Sean Connery was a robust, handsome, mid-late thirties former body builder with a thick, monochromatic (black) rug of chest hair.
Funny thing about aging. Once you get much past 45 that "monochromatic" thing turns into a rug of salt & pepper grey hair, with some of them going ape-shit in length; as well as a-symmetric patches of it developing willy-nilly.
Women's lingerie was created to accentuate the positive, and camouflage the negative. Every male model in your link was under the age of 35. Add 15+ years to them and suddenly they start transforming into wrinkled fuzzy bears with tufts of erratic hair with sweat droplets running down their length. I can't see where that is any more attractive than droopy, stretch marked boobs and sagging pubis monds on a middle aged woman.
There are practical/aesthetic/hygienic reasons for man-scaping just as there is a reason for soap and water
I actually love body hair on a man. Having my head on a sturdy chest and running my hands up and down the fur, from collar bone to pubic bone.
I also love to give a nice, sloppy BJ. And pubes in my mouth is the grossest thing ever.
Yummy BJs > Body Hair
If you want me to spend more than five seconds on your balls, SHAVE MUHFUH.
Yes I know I purposely mis-spelled genes. This man's perspective on north american woman. Pitts and legs shaved. If you want to edge the kitty ok. A fur kitty is normal. It's woman.
Little girls are bare. That's not sexy 'cause it's a little pervy. Understand about Brazilian down there WRT hygiene, but a woman has a muff, and it's sexy.
So there was this late night show I saw from the 80's called MagnumPI. That guy was fuzzy and I think they picked him for that show 'cause the ladies thought he was hot.
A lot of male underwear models in media are bare, but I think it's to - not draw attention away from the clothing. (that's what they are trying to sell).
I have also experienced a sense that Providers visuals should display engorged breasts(implants). That suggests current and post pregnancy conditions. Nope... real breasts of any size are part of her whole package to stimulate / arouse her desire to coitis.
Sexy and aroused are states of mind.
Being attractive to the other is a thought process in which both participate.
Did I get off topic again?
Jonathan
http://www.buzzfeed.com/mjs538/dear-men-no-more-manscaping?bffb